Literature DB >> 27618226

Physiological Profile of Male Competitive and Recreational Surfers.

James W Furness1, Wayne A Hing1, Jeremy M Sheppard2, Sean C Newcomer3, Ben L Schram1, Mike Climstein1,4.   

Abstract

Furness, J, Hing, W, Sheppard, JM, Newcomer, S, Schram, B, and Climstein, M. Physiological profile of male competitive and recreational surfers. J Strength Cond Res 32(2): 372-378, 2018-Surfing consists of both high- and low-intensity paddling of varying durations, using both the aerobic and anaerobic systems. Surf-specific physiological studies lack adequate group sample sizes, and V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak values are yet to determine the differences between competitive and recreational surfers. The purpose of this study was therefore to provide a comprehensive physiological profile of both recreational and competitive surfers. This multisite study involved 62 male surfers, recreational (n = 47) and competitive (n = 15). Anthropometric measurements were conducted followed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, anaerobic testing and finally aerobic testing. V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak was significantly greater in competitive surfers than in recreational surfers (M = 40.71 ± 3.28 vs. 31.25 ± 6.31 ml·kg·min, p < 0.001). This was also paralleled for anaerobic power (M = 303.93 vs. 264.58 W) for competitive surfers. Arm span and lean total muscle mass was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) correlated with key performance variables (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and anaerobic power). No significant (p ≥ 0.05) correlations were revealed between season rank and each of the variables of interest (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and anaerobic power). Key performance variables (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak and anaerobic power) are significantly higher in competitive surfers, indicating that this is both an adaptation and requirement in this cohort. This battery of physiological tests could be used as a screening tool to identify an athlete's weaknesses or strengths. Coaches and clinicians could then select appropriate training regimes to address weaknesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27618226     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  A Comparison of Aerobic Fitness Testing on a Swim Bench and Treadmill in a Recreational Surfing Cohort: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hamzeh Khundaqji; Enad Samain; Mike Climstein; Ben Schram; Wayne Hing; James Furness
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-11

2.  The impact of a single surfing paddling cycle on fatigue and energy cost.

Authors:  Márcio Borgonovo-Santos; Rodrigo Zacca; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Morphological and Physical Profile of a Collegiate Water Skier.

Authors:  Michael A Woodgate; Joshua J Gann; William Hey; Hyun Chul Jung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A Comparison of Two Commercial Swim Bench Ergometers in Determining Maximal Aerobic Power and Correlation to a Paddle Test in a Recreational Surfing Cohort.

Authors:  James Furness; Linley Bertacchini; Lisa Hicklen; Dane Monaghan; Elisa Canetti; Mike Climstein
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.