| Literature DB >> 27618009 |
Zaitunnatakhin Zamli1, Kate Robson Brown2, Mohammed Sharif3.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder, characterised by focal loss of cartilage and increased subchondral bone remodelling at early OA stages of the disease. We have investigated the temporal and the spatial relationship between bone remodelling in subchondral bone plate (Sbp) and trabecular bone (Tb) in Dunkin Hartley (DH, develop OA early) and the Bristol Strain 2 (BS2, control which develop OA late) guinea pigs. Right tibias were dissected from six male animals of each strain, at 10, 16, 24 and 30 weeks of age. Micro-computed tomography was used to quantify the growth plate thickness (GpTh), subchondral bone plate thickness (SbpTh) and trabecular bone thickness (TbTh), and bone mineral density (BMD) in both Sbp and Tb. The rate of change was calculated for 10-16 weeks, 16-24 weeks and 24-30 weeks. The rate of changes in Sbp and Tb thickness at the earliest time interval (10-16 weeks) were significantly greater in DH guinea pigs than in the growth-matched control strain (BS2). The magnitude of these differences was greater in the medial side than the lateral side (DH: 22.7 and 14.75 µm/week, BS2: 5.63 and 6.67 µm/week, respectively). Similarly, changes in the BMD at the earliest time interval was greater in the DH strain than the BS2, again more pronounced in the disease prone medial compartment (DH: 0.0698 and 0.0372 g/cm³/week, BS2: 0.00457 and 0.00772 g/cm³/week, respectively). These changes observed preceded microscopic and cellular signs of disease as previously reported. The rapid early changes in SbpTh, TbTh, Sbp BMD and Tb BMD in the disease prone DH guinea pigs compared with the BS2 control strain suggest a link to early OA pathology. This is corroborated by the greater relative changes in subchondral bone in the medial compared with the lateral compartment.Entities:
Keywords: animal models; bone mineral density; bone remodelling; micro-computed tomography scanning; osteoarthritis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27618009 PMCID: PMC5037773 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Growth plate thickness (GrpTh) of the proximal tibial epiphysis of DH and BS2 at four different time points. GrpTh was compared between the successive time points (Kruskal-Wallis test). A significant difference of p ≤ 0.01 in both strains was denoted as **, while p ≤ 0.01 only in DH was denoted as ##. Error bars represent the 95% CI.
Figure 2Frontal sections of micro-CT images of right tibial epiphysis of DH (A) and BS2 (B) at four time points. The images show the SbpTh and Tb morphometry changes on the medial (M) and the lateral sides (L) of the tibial epiphysis. Subchondral bone cyst (*) and osteophyte (arrow head) are seen in some of the images.
The mean of subchondral bone thickness and density in DH and BS2 during the 30 weeks study period.
| Medial/Lateral Side | Bone Parameters | 10 Weeks | 16 Weeks | 24 Weeks | 30 Weeks | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DH | BS2 | DH | BS2 | DH | BS2 | DH | BS2 | ||||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Medial | SbpTh (µm) | 390.4 ‡ | 77.1 | 411.6 * | 58.1 | 526.6 *,† | 29.0 | 445.4 * | 44.1 | 569.3 * | 74.9 | 524.1 * | 55.0 | 639.8 | 61.8 | 561.2 | 64.0 |
| TbTh (µm) | 119.4 * | 3.3 | 112.9 * | 6.3 | 141.7 † | 4.5 | 124.5 | 7.9 | 146.9 | 30.7 | 128.7 | 8.0 | 148.8 | 19.5 | 131.4 | 9.6 | |
| Sbp BMD (g/cm3) | 1.3 ‡ | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.7 *,† | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 * | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.4 * | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.2 | |
| Tb BMD (g/cm3) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 *,‡ | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |
| Lateral | SbpTh (µm) | 365.3 | 29.5 | 324.3 | 52.0 | 453.8 † | 41.1 | 360.9 | 41.3 | 507.2 | 57.0 | 462.0 ‡ | 41.2 | 512.7 | 104.0 | 540.6 ‡ | 50.9 |
| TbTh (µm) | 108.2 ‡ | 3.8 | 106.1 ‡ | 4.8 | 129.2 | 9.2 | 120.7 | 6.3 | 127.7 | 11.7 | 128.0 | 9.2 | 123.9 | 9.4 | 125.4 | 8.4 | |
| Sbp BMD (g/cm3) | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.1 † | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.1 | |
| Tb BMD (g/cm3) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 ‡ | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 † | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |
* A significant differerent between the sides of the same strain and time point (p < 0.05); † A significant differerent between the strains of the same side and time point (p < 0.05); ‡ A significant differerent between the adjacent time points of the same strain and side (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Rate of change in subchondral bone thickness of DH and BS2 guinea pigs for intervals 10–16, 16–24 and 24–30 weeks. (A) Medial SbpTh; (B) lateral SbpTh; (C) medial TbTh and (D) lateral TbTh. The rate of change in subchondral bone thickness between strains over time intervals were ranked and compared using 1-way ANOVA § and Student t-test ¶. The p-values shown are for the earliest time point only.
Figure 4Rate of change in subchondral BMD of DH and BS2 guinea pigs for intervals 10–16, 16–24 and 24–30 weeks. (A) Medial Sbp BMD; (B) lateral Sbp BMD; (C) medial Tb BMD and (D) lateral Tb BMD. The rate of change in subchondral bone BMD between strains over time intervals were ranked and compared using 1 way ANOVA § and Student t-test ¶. The p-values shown are for the earliest time point only.