This is the first editorial of the International Journal of Integrated Care to be
published by our new open-access publisher, Ubiquity Press. It follows a successful
15-year period supported by Igitur at the University Library Utrecht where IJIC was the
first digital journal in their portfolio. However, as integrated care has grown as a
service innovation, so the ever increasing numbers of articles being submitted to IJIC
means that the ‘incubation’ period of our Journal within Igitur has long
since passed and so we now enter into a new venture to support a larger audience of
academics, professionals and decision-makers keen to absorb the latest knowledge in this
growing field of scientific inquiry.Entering such an exciting new period for our Journal raises the question about what
aspects of integrated care require the generation of new knowledge that is backed up by
work of high scientific quality? As we know, numerous questions about integrated care
have yet to be answered. For example, previous editorials have pointed to the need for
new domains of investigation from understanding how to embed integrated care into the
community [1] and how to research the outcomes and
costs of integrated care properly [2].For myself, the phenomenon of integrated care remains attractive (almost mysterious)
because it seems that we have a lot more to learn beyond the knowledge of ‘how to
do it’ and whether integrated care can achieve the (Triple Aim) results to which
it aspires. The pluriformity of integrated care and the belief that ‘no form or
size fits all’ (not all clients, nor all professionals, nor all systems) draws us
back to a discussion on the core purpose of integrated care. What is the basis of
integrated care thinking? What lies underneath it? What is it all about?In my own work I have studied whether generic elements of integrated care could be
defined and what these elements are. These studies showed that these elements could
indeed be defined and were formulated as activities that seem relevant in multiple and
very different integrated care settings. Examples of 89 found ‘elements’ are
for instance ‘systematically assessing the needs of clients’ or
‘stimulating trust among care partners’ [3]. A number of following studies showed that these kinds of (generic)
elements are relevant in multiple settings regardless of client group, the range of
(health and social) care partners involved, the geographical location or even country
context [4]. The recently developed taxonomy and
Rainbow model [5] also searches for generic
knowledge about (the level and type of) integration, and the work
of Project INTEGRATE will seek to develop a similar framework to help
guide managers and decision-makers later this year.What these studies show is that there is continued interest in, the conceptual
understanding of integrated care and its subsequent underlying principles. It is
interesting to see that the 2002 paper of Kodner and Spreeuwenberg [6] – about the concept, meaning and logic of
integrated care – remains in the top ten of the most requested IJIC articles.
However, if we accept that integrated care strives to improve quality of care and
experiences to clients, then better understanding the values that underpin integrated
care from that perspective is important and the definitions that we currently accept may
need to be challenged.Recently, Ferrer and Goodwin set out a list of 16 principles of integrated care drawing
on their work with the World Health Organisation and the reflection of expert
participants from different country contexts [7]
[see Box 1]. Ferrer and Goodwin invited
readers to join the debate about whether a set of principles is needed and whether the
principles that they suggest are the right ones. Whilst the reactions of fellow
healthcare scientists and professionals were positive on the need for a set of values
and principles, there was considerable difference in opinion on what should, or should
not, be included and/or on how certain key principles should be described Specifically,
the principles appeared to many to be lacking the perspective of the service user and
community and remained driven by the viewpoint of care professionals or the health
system.These discussions suggest that further research and debate is needed to establish the
core values and principles to integrated care and, especially, to ensure the set of
principles properly includes the perspectives of clients, civilians and communities
enough.In order to address this, Vilans and IFIC have initiated a Special Interest Group (SIG)
with the aim of developing a valuable, valid and workable set or principles for
person-centered and integrated care. The SIG will act as a forum to further discuss the
principles and values of integrated care and also to co-create a comprehensive set of
principles that deepen our understanding of the values underpinning integrated care. The
launch of the SIG on Principles of Integrated Care will be held at the IFIC Conference 2016 in Barcelona which is scheduled for Wednesday May
25th May at 7.30 AM and an on-line forum will be announced shortly. If
you are interested in joining this SIG, please feel invited to participate. To get
involved, please send an expression of interest by email to n.zonneveld@vilans.nl. Your
contribution will be highly valued!Prof. Dr. M.M.N. MinkmanHead of Research & Innovation, Vilans, National Center of Excellence in Long-term
Care.Distinguished Professor, University of Tilburg/TIAS, Innovation of organization and
governance of long term integrated careComprehensive – a commitment to universal health coverage to ensure
care is comprehensive and tailored to the evolving health needs and
aspirations of people and populationsEquitable – care that is accessible and available to allSustainable – care that is both efficient, effective and contributes to
sustainable developmentCo-ordinated – care that is integrated around people’s needs and
effectively coordinated across different providers and settingsContinuous – continuity of care and services that are provided across
the life courseHolistic – a focus physical, socio-economic, mental, and emotional
wellnessPreventative – tackles the social determinants of ill-health through
intra- and inter-sectoral action that promote public health and health
promotionEmpowering – supports people to manage and take responsibility for
their own healthGoal oriented – in how people make health care decisions, assess
outcomes and measure successRespectful – to people’s dignity, social circumstances and
cultural sensitivitiesCollaborative – care that supports relationship-building, team-based
working and collaborative practice across primary, secondary, tertiary care
and other sectorsCo-produced – through active partnerships with people and communities
at an individual, organisational and policy-levelEndowed with rights and responsibilities – that all citizens should
expect, exercise and respectGoverned through shared accountability – between care providers for
quality of care and health outcomes to local peopleEvidence-informed – such that policies and strategies are guided by the
best available evidence and supported over time through the assessment of
measurable objectives for improving quality and outcomesLed by whole-systems thinking
Competing Interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Authors: Mylaine Breton; Paul Wankah; Maxime Guillette; Yves Couturier; Louise Belzile; Dominique Gagnon; Jean-Louis Denis Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 5.120