| Literature DB >> 27616849 |
V Satish1, Prabhadevi Cm2, Hegde Kv1.
Abstract
The term "occult caries" and "hidden caries" are used to describe such lesions, which are not clinically diagnosed but detected only on radiographs. A female patient aged 14 years reported for routine dental check-up. On Intraoral examination, sinus was seen in the buccal mucosa of maxillary left second premolar 25. On clinical examination the occlusal surface remained ostensibly intact; tooth was asymptomatic with no past history of pain. On radiographic examination, there was radiolucency in distobuccal aspect of 25 involving enamel, dentin and nearing pulp with presence of open apex and periapical radiolucency irt 25. With clinical and radiographic evaluation, the case was diagnosed as occult caries in relation to 25. Apexification was done with calcium hydroxide. The tooth is under observation; once radiographic barrier is formed conventional root canal treatment will be performed. Conclusion : Early diagnosis of occult lesions is the best management. As radiographs are probably the most effective method of diagnosing all occult lesions, they should be recommended at appropriate ages to aid early detection of these lesions.Entities:
Keywords: Occult caries; Pre-eruptive carious lesions.
Year: 2010 PMID: 27616849 PMCID: PMC4993833 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1083i
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Fig. 1Intraoral sinus in relation to 25
Fig. 2Occlusal view of the maxilla with intact occlusal surface of 25
Fig. 3IOPA of 25 revealing the disto-occlusal caries involving enamel and dentin
Fig. 4GP point locating sinus pathway
Fig. 5Excavation of occult caries in relation to 25
Fig. 6Access opening in relation to 25
Fig. 7Working length IOPA in relation to 25
Fig. 8IOPA showing calcium hydroxide dressing in relation to 25
| Sawle and Andlaw/1988[ | 14-16 years (740 subjects, 1974) | All 1st and 2nd molars | 3.6 (1974) | ||||
| (1319 subjects, 1982) | 3.1 (1982) | ||||||
| Creanor et al/1990[ | 14-15 yrs (2623 subjects) | Mandibular 1st and 2nd molars | 11.8 | ||||
| Maxillary 1st and 2nd molars, | 3.1 | ||||||
| premolars | 0.8 | ||||||
| Kidd et al/1992[ | Adolescents (6110 teeth) | Mandibular 1st and 2nd molars | 12.9 | ||||
| Maxillary 1st and 2nd molars | 6.3 | ||||||
| Weerheijm et al/1992[ | 14 yrs (131 subjects) | 26 | |||||
| 17 yrs (123 subjects) | All 1st and 2nd molars | 38 | |||||
| 20 yrs | 50 | ||||||
| Weerheijm et al/1992 [ | 12.4 yrs (359 subjects) | All 1st and 2nd molars | 15 |