Literature DB >> 27616723

The CAPRA Score at 10 Years: Contemporary Perspectives and Analysis of Supporting Studies.

Jonathan S Brajtbord1, Michael S Leapman1, Matthew R Cooperberg2.   

Abstract

Tools that appraise oncologic risk are a critical component of research and clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa). We performed a PubMed/Medline search to review the concept, design, and clinical validation of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score and similar systems in the postsurgical (CAPRA-S) and primary androgen deprivation therapy (Japan CAPRA [J-CAPRA]) settings. We included reports addressing the CAPRA (n=13), CAPRA-S (n=4), and J-CAPRA (n=5) scores. External validation studies for the CAPRA score have yielded favorable clinical performance in both academic and community cohorts, with concordance index (c-index) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after definitive treatment in the range of 0.66-0.81. Validation studies addressing the postsurgical CAPRA-S score have demonstrated favorable prediction of distant end points (c-index for BCR: 0.73-0.80; prostate cancer-specific mortality [PCSM]: 0.75-0.88). The J-CAPRA score was evaluated in 1378 men treated with primary ADT and demonstrated excellent discrimination (c-index for progression-free survival: 0.80-0.89; PCSM: 0.820-0.836; overall survival: 0.665-0.700). The CAPRA score and its derivatives have demonstrated robust clinical discrimination in a decade of validation studies. The CAPRA score and similar multivariable stratification systems are posed to replace prior older and less accurate risk group categories. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We addressed the development of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, its methodology, and its supporting studies. The CAPRA score and similarly designed tools have yielded strong performance in the prediction of numerous prostate cancer end points.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer outcomes; Risk calculator

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27616723     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in Chinese patients with prostate cancer receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy: validation of Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (J-CAPRA) score and impacts of pre-existing obesity and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Meng-Bo Hu; Tian Yang; Ji-Meng Hu; Wen-Hui Zhu; Hao-Wen Jiang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Clinical risk-stratification for prostate cancer: Where are we, and where do we need to go?

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Precision intervention for prostate cancer: Re-evaluating who is at risk.

Authors:  Alexandros Papachristodoulou; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 9.756

4.  Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data.

Authors:  Pin Li; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel E Spratt; R Jeffery Karnes; Matthew J Schipper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Esther Fernández-Galan; Rosa Fernández Bonifacio; Laura Foj
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2018-05-16

6.  Downregulation of serum CXCL4L1 predicts progression and poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mo Zhang; Johnny Guan; Yun-Long Huo; Yong-Sheng Song; Li-Zhu Chen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Tumor copy number alteration burden is a pan-cancer prognostic factor associated with recurrence and death.

Authors:  Haley Hieronymus; Rajmohan Murali; Amy Tin; Kamlesh Yadav; Wassim Abida; Henrik Moller; Daniel Berney; Howard Scher; Brett Carver; Peter Scardino; Nikolaus Schultz; Barry Taylor; Andrew Vickers; Jack Cuzick; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Current status of its use as a treatment endpoint and early management strategies.

Authors:  Barrett Z McCormick; Ali M Mahmoud; Stephen B Williams; John W Davis
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

9.  Assessment of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (Review).

Authors:  Xiaozeng Lin; Anil Kapoor; Yan Gu; Mathilda Jing Chow; Hui Xu; Pierre Major; Damu Tang
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  The Prognostic PDE4D7 Score in a Diagnostic Biopsy Prostate Cancer Patient Cohort with Longitudinal Biological Outcomes.

Authors:  Dianne van Strijp; Christiane de Witz; Pieter C Vos; Eveline den Biezen-Timmermans; Anne van Brussel; Janneke Wrobel; George S Baillie; Pierre Tennstedt; Thorsten Schlomm; Birthe Heitkötter; Sebastian Huss; Martin Bögemann; Miles D Houslay; Chris Bangma; Axel Semjonow; Ralf Hoffmann
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2018-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.