Literature DB >> 27616206

Endomyocardial proteomic signature corresponding to the response of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy to immunoadsorption therapy.

Gourav Bhardwaj1, Marcus Dörr2, Praveen Kumar Sappa3, Sabine Ameling1, Vishnu Dhople3, Leif Steil3, Karin Klingel4, Klaus Empen5, Daniel Beug5, Uwe Völker1, Stephan B Felix6, Elke Hammer7.   

Abstract

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a disease of the myocardium with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Cardiac autoantibodies (AAbs) play a causal role in the development and progression of DCM. Removal of AAbs using immunoadsorption (IA/IgG) has been shown as a therapeutic option to improve cardiac function. However, the response to therapy differs significantly among patients. The reasons for this variability are not completely understood. Hitherto, no potential biomarker is available to predict improvement of cardiac function after therapy accurately. This shotgun proteome study aims to disclose the differences in the endomyocardial proteome between patients with improved LVEF after IA/IgG (responders) and those without improvement (non-responders) before therapy start. Comparative analysis revealed 54 differentially abundant proteins that were mostly confined to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, energy and immune regulation, and cardioprotection. Selected proteins representing various functional categories were further confirmed by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Among those, protein S100-A8, perilipin-4, and kininogen-1 were found the most robust candidates differentiating responders and non-responders. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of these proteins revealed highest potential for protein S100-A8 (AUC 0.92) with high sensitivity and specificity to be developed as a classifier for the prediction of cardiac improvement after IA/IgG therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: We evaluated the differences in the myocardial proteome of responder and non-responder DCM patients before immunoadsorption therapy and identified a number of differentially abundant proteins involved in energy and lipid metabolism, immune system, and cardioprotection. MRM was used for verification of results. Proteins S100-A8, perilipin-4, and kininogen-1 were found to display the largest differences. The results provide a lead for further studies to screen for protein biomarker candidates in plasma that might be helpful to stratify patients for immunoadsorption therapy treatment.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dilated cardiomyopathy; Endomyocardial biopsies; Label-free tandem mass spectrometry; Multiple reaction monitoring; Therapy response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27616206     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  5 in total

1.  The N-Terminal CCHC Zinc Finger Motif Mediates Homodimerization of Transcription Factor BCL11B.

Authors:  Passorn Winkler; Martin Delin; Piotr Grabarczyk; Praveen K Sappa; Sander Bekeschus; Petra Hildebrandt; Grzegorz K Przybylski; Uwe Völker; Elke Hammer; Christian A Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Roles of Host Immunity in Viral Myocarditis and Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Lifang Zhao; Zhaoying Fu
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 3.  A Toolbox of Potential Immune-Related Therapies for Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ahmed Elsanhoury; Carsten Tschöpe; Sophie Van Linthout
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Identification of Immune Markers in Dilated Cardiomyopathies with Heart Failure by Integrated Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis.

Authors:  Xuehua Wang; Hongquan Guan; Wei Liu; Huili Li; Jiaxing Ding; Yu Feng; Zhijian Chen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Differences in Cell-Intrinsic Inflammatory Programs of Yolk Sac and Bone Marrow Macrophages.

Authors:  Sara Elhag; Christopher Stremmel; Annette Zehrer; Josefine Plocke; Roman Hennel; Michaela Keuper; Clarissa Knabe; Julia Winterhalter; Vanessa Gölling; Lukas Tomas; Tobias Weinberger; Maximilian Fischer; Lulu Liu; Franziska Wagner; Michael Lorenz; Konstantin Stark; Hans Häcker; Marc Schmidt-Supprian; Uwe Völker; Martin Jastroch; Kirsten Lauber; Tobias Straub; Barbara Walzog; Elke Hammer; Christian Schulz
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.