Kali Zhou1, Thomas Fitzpatrick2, Nick Walsh3, Ji Young Kim3, Roger Chou4, Mellanye Lackey5, Julia Scott3, Ying-Ru Lo3, Joseph D Tucker6. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines. 4. Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Spencer S Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 6. UNC-Project China, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; International Diagnostics Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: jdtucker@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advances in therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have ushered in a new era in chronic hepatitis treatment. To maximise the effectiveness of these medicines, individuals must be engaged and retained in care. We analysed operational interventions to enhance chronic viral hepatitis testing, linkage to care, treatment uptake, adherence, and viral suppression or cure. METHODS: We did a systematic review of operational interventions, and did meta-analyses for sufficiently comparable data. We searched PubMed, Embase, WHO library, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for randomised controlled trials and controlled non-randomised studies that examined operational interventions along the chronic viral hepatitis care continuum, published in English up to Dec 31, 2014. We included non-pharmaceutical intervention studies with primary or secondary outcomes of testing, linkage to care, treatment uptake, treatment adherence, treatment completion, treatment outcome, or viral endpoints. We excluded dissertations and studies of children only. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Studies were assessed for bias. Data from similar interventions were pooled and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. This study was registered in PROSPERO (42014015094). FINDINGS: We identified 7583 unduplicated studies, and included 56 studies that reported outcomes along the care continuum (41 for HCV and 18 for HBV). All studies except one were from high-income countries. Lay health worker HBV test promotion interventions increased HBV testing rates (relative risk [RR] 2·68, 95% CI 1·82-3·93). Clinician reminders to prompt HCV testing during clinical visits increased HCV testing rates (3·70, 1·81-7·57). Nurse-led educational interventions improved HCV treatment completion (1·14, 1·05-1·23) and cure (odds ratio [OR] 1·93, 95% CI 1·44-2·59). Coordinated mental health, substance misuse, and hepatitis treatment services increased HCV treatment uptake (OR 3·03, 1·24-7·37), adherence (RR 1·22, 1·05-1·41), and cure (RR 1·21, 1·07-1·38) compared with usual care. INTERPRETATION: Several simple, inexpensive operational interventions can substantially improve engagement and retention along the chronic viral hepatitis care continuum. Further operational research to inform scale-up of hepatitis services is needed in low-income and middle-income countries. FUNDING: World Health Organization and US Fulbright Program.
BACKGROUND: Advances in therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have ushered in a new era in chronic hepatitis treatment. To maximise the effectiveness of these medicines, individuals must be engaged and retained in care. We analysed operational interventions to enhance chronic viral hepatitis testing, linkage to care, treatment uptake, adherence, and viral suppression or cure. METHODS: We did a systematic review of operational interventions, and did meta-analyses for sufficiently comparable data. We searched PubMed, Embase, WHO library, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for randomised controlled trials and controlled non-randomised studies that examined operational interventions along the chronic viral hepatitis care continuum, published in English up to Dec 31, 2014. We included non-pharmaceutical intervention studies with primary or secondary outcomes of testing, linkage to care, treatment uptake, treatment adherence, treatment completion, treatment outcome, or viral endpoints. We excluded dissertations and studies of children only. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Studies were assessed for bias. Data from similar interventions were pooled and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. This study was registered in PROSPERO (42014015094). FINDINGS: We identified 7583 unduplicated studies, and included 56 studies that reported outcomes along the care continuum (41 for HCV and 18 for HBV). All studies except one were from high-income countries. Lay health worker HBV test promotion interventions increased HBV testing rates (relative risk [RR] 2·68, 95% CI 1·82-3·93). Clinician reminders to prompt HCV testing during clinical visits increased HCV testing rates (3·70, 1·81-7·57). Nurse-led educational interventions improved HCV treatment completion (1·14, 1·05-1·23) and cure (odds ratio [OR] 1·93, 95% CI 1·44-2·59). Coordinated mental health, substance misuse, and hepatitis treatment services increased HCV treatment uptake (OR 3·03, 1·24-7·37), adherence (RR 1·22, 1·05-1·41), and cure (RR 1·21, 1·07-1·38) compared with usual care. INTERPRETATION: Several simple, inexpensive operational interventions can substantially improve engagement and retention along the chronic viral hepatitis care continuum. Further operational research to inform scale-up of hepatitis services is needed in low-income and middle-income countries. FUNDING: World Health Organization and US Fulbright Program.
Authors: Emma Day; Margaret Hellard; Carla Treloar; Julie Bruneau; Natasha K Martin; Anne Øvrehus; Olav Dalgard; Andrew Lloyd; John Dillon; Matt Hickman; Jude Byrne; Alain Litwin; Mojca Maticic; Philip Bruggmann; Havard Midgard; Brianna Norton; Stacey Trooskin; Jeffrey V Lazarus; Jason Grebely Journal: Liver Int Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Judith I Tsui; Claire M Miller; John D Scott; Maria A Corcorran; Julia C Dombrowski; Sara N Glick Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kali Zhou; Jennifer L Dodge; Joshua Grab; Eduard Poltavskiy; Norah A Terrault Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Stephen P Connolly; Gordana Avramovic; Walter Cullen; Tina McHugh; Eileen O'Connor; Geoff Mc Combe; Des Crowley; Anna Marie Naughton; Aidan Horan; John S Lambert Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Laura E Starbird; Chakra Budhathoki; Hae-Ra Han; Mark S Sulkowski; Nancy R Reynolds; Jason E Farley Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Aung H Bwa; Gayatri Nangia; Si T S Win; Soe T Maung; Khin A W Han; Su S Htar; Lei Y Wine; Wint W Ko; Moe P Oo; Naomi K T Hlaing; Julia Palecki; Bao L Loza; Khin M Win; Rajender Reddy Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2018-12-19
Authors: Margaret Hellard; Sophia E Schroeder; Alisa Pedrana; Joseph Doyle; Campbell Aitken Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Jason Grebely; Julie Bruneau; Jeffrey V Lazarus; Olav Dalgard; Philip Bruggmann; Carla Treloar; Matthew Hickman; Margaret Hellard; Teri Roberts; Levinia Crooks; Håvard Midgard; Sarah Larney; Louisa Degenhardt; Hannu Alho; Jude Byrne; John F Dillon; Jordan J Feld; Graham Foster; David Goldberg; Andrew R Lloyd; Jens Reimer; Geert Robaeys; Marta Torrens; Nat Wright; Icro Maremmani; Brianna L Norton; Alain H Litwin; Gregory J Dore Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2017-07-03