Literature DB >> 27614388

Does Release of the Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Result in Clinically Harmful Effects After the Fixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears?

Kyu Sung Chung1, Jeong Ku Ha2, Ho Jong Ra3, Jin Goo Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate pain and tenderness, stress testing, clinical outcome scores, complications, and operation time at 24 months and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis at 12 months after the release of the distal attachment of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) during medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) fixation.
METHODS: Patients who received MMPRT fixation with a follow-up of at least 2 years were included. During fixation, the release of the distal attachment of the sMCL on the proximal tibia was performed to improve visualization and provide sufficient working space. Pain and tenderness at the released area, manual valgus stress tests of 30° and 0° flexion (grade 0/1/2/3), and subjective instability during weight bearing were evaluated serially at postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24+ months. The contour of detachment area was assessed using MRI 12 months postoperatively. As a subgroup analysis, tourniquet time (minutes) and final clinical scores were compared between release and nonrelease groups.
RESULTS: The numbers of participants in the release and nonrelease groups were 118 and 20 patients, and their mean follow-up durations were 42.4 ± 19.3 (24-95) and 37.2 ± 7.8 (30-55) months, respectively. In the release group, percentages of patients with pain and tenderness at 3 months were 15% and 18%, respectively; however, no patients had symptoms at 12 months. In valgus stress tests (30°, 0°), 12% and 2% of patients showed grade 1 laxity at 3 months, and 7% had grade 1 laxity in only 30° flexion at the final follow-up. However, no patients had subjective valgus laxity. An intact contour was confirmed in all cases among 94 patients checked by performing follow-up MRI. Tourniquet time was significantly shorter in the release group (42.4 ± 19.3) than in the nonrelease group (58.5 ± 9.5; P < .001). Between release and nonrelease groups, Lysholm (84.4 ± 12.1, 88.1 ± 12.8; P = .117) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores (73.6 ± 11.2, 77.5 ± 11.9; P = .112) did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS: The release of the distal attachment of the sMCL during fixation of MMPRT did not result in pain and tenderness, residual instability, and complication. An intact contour of the sMCL was confirmed in all cases with MRI. This procedure reduced operation time and showed similar clinical results when compared between the release and nonrelease groups. However, this study had low power to detect the difference for clinical scores between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614388     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

1.  How to Perform Concomitant Medial Meniscus Pull-Out Repair With Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Without Technical Failure.

Authors:  Jin Woo Jin; Jin Goo Kim; Joon Ho Wang; Jungyeun Tae; Jun Ho Kim; Byung Hoon Lee; Jun Yong Park; Do Kyung Lee
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears: clinical results were not age-dependent, but osteoarthritis progressed.

Authors:  Kyu Sung Chung; Jeong Ku Ha; Ho Jong Ra; Han Sung Lee; Dhong Won Lee; Jung Ho Park; Du Han Kim; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tears.

Authors:  M J Feucht; K Izadpanah; L Lacheta; N P Südkamp; A B Imhoff; P Forkel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplantation with Modified Bone Plug Technique.

Authors:  Dhong Won Lee; Jung Ho Park; Kyu Sung Chung; Jeong Ku Ha; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-08-28

Review 5.  Percutaneous Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Release Outcomes During Medial Meniscal Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael A Gaudiani; Derrick M Knapik; Matthew W Kaufman; Michael J Salata; James E Voos; Michael R Karns
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-19

6.  The Outside-In, Percutaneous Release of the Medial Collateral Ligament for Knee Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Thomas E Moran; Alex Demers; John T Awowale; Brian C Werner; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-02-25

7.  Percutaneous Medial Collateral Ligament Release Improves Medial Compartment Access During Knee Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Thomas E Moran; Alex J Demers; Kaitlyn M Shank; John T Awowale; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.