BACKGROUND: COPD is a heterogeneous disease composed by two main phenotypes: bronchitis (COPDb) and emphysema (COPDe) with different clinical presentation, physiology, imaging, response to therapy and decline in lung function. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether nocturnal hypoxemic COPDb and COPDe have a different behaviour during sleep and the effect of nocturnal oxygen supplementation (nO2LT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 75 COPDb and 120 COPDe were enrolled. All patients performed polysomnography, Pittsburgh and Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure questionnaire, and pulmonary function before and after six months of nO2LT. RESULTS: At baseline, compared to COPDb, COPDe have decreased sleep efficiency (SE) (67.5±6% vs. 76.9±3% p<0.05) and higher arousals (A/I) (18.1±3 event/h vs. 8.7±1 event/h p<0.05). Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) was increased during REM (7.1±1 event/h vs. 2.3±0.5 event/h p<0.05). nO2LT in COPDe improves SE (77±4% vs. 67.5±6% p<0.05) and decreases A/I (9±5 event/h vs. 18.1±3 event/h p<0.05). ODI during REM (3.5±2 event/h vs. 7.1±1 p<0.05) decreases and quality of life (QoL) improves (MFR-28 total 56±22 vs 45±20 p<0.05), due to an improvement in cognitive abilities (45±30 vs 33±31 p<0.05) and daily activities (61±29 vs 53±21 p>0.05). In COPDb nO2LT reduces ST90 (15±6% vs. 43±8% p<0.05) less than in COPDe (15±6% vs. 8±4% p<0.05); improves A/I (10±2 event/h vs. 8.7±1 p<0.05) and there is no evidence of an improvement in QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of nO2LT improve quality of life in COPDe, not in COPDb. We found a difference in sleep quality between COPDe and COPDb.
BACKGROUND:COPD is a heterogeneous disease composed by two main phenotypes: bronchitis (COPDb) and emphysema (COPDe) with different clinical presentation, physiology, imaging, response to therapy and decline in lung function. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether nocturnal hypoxemic COPDb and COPDe have a different behaviour during sleep and the effect of nocturnal oxygen supplementation (nO2LT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 75 COPDb and 120 COPDe were enrolled. All patients performed polysomnography, Pittsburgh and Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure questionnaire, and pulmonary function before and after six months of nO2LT. RESULTS: At baseline, compared to COPDb, COPDe have decreased sleep efficiency (SE) (67.5±6% vs. 76.9±3% p<0.05) and higher arousals (A/I) (18.1±3 event/h vs. 8.7±1 event/h p<0.05). Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) was increased during REM (7.1±1 event/h vs. 2.3±0.5 event/h p<0.05). nO2LT in COPDe improves SE (77±4% vs. 67.5±6% p<0.05) and decreases A/I (9±5 event/h vs. 18.1±3 event/h p<0.05). ODI during REM (3.5±2 event/h vs. 7.1±1 p<0.05) decreases and quality of life (QoL) improves (MFR-28 total 56±22 vs 45±20 p<0.05), due to an improvement in cognitive abilities (45±30 vs 33±31 p<0.05) and daily activities (61±29 vs 53±21 p>0.05). In COPDb nO2LT reduces ST90 (15±6% vs. 43±8% p<0.05) less than in COPDe (15±6% vs. 8±4% p<0.05); improves A/I (10±2 event/h vs. 8.7±1 p<0.05) and there is no evidence of an improvement in QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of nO2LT improve quality of life in COPDe, not in COPDb. We found a difference in sleep quality between COPDe and COPDb.
Authors: Ashraf Fawzy; Han Woo; Aparna Balasubramanian; Igor Barjaktarevic; R Graham Barr; Russell P Bowler; Alejandro P Comellas; Christopher B Cooper; David Couper; Gerard J Criner; Mark T Dransfield; MeiLan K Han; Eric A Hoffman; Richard E Kanner; Jerry A Krishnan; Fernando J Martinez; Meredith McCormack; Robert Paine Iii; Stephen Peters; Robert Wise; Prescott G Woodruff; Nadia N Hansel; Nirupama Putcha Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2021-07-28