Sheila M Alessi1, Carla J Rash1, Nancy M Petry1. 1. School of Medicine and Calhoun Cardiology Center - Behavioral Health, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Abstinence reinforcement is efficacious for improving smoking treatment outcomes, but practical constraints related to the need for multiple in-person carbon monoxide (CO) breath tests daily to verify smoking abstinence have limited its use. This study tested an mHealth procedure to remotely monitor and reinforce smoking abstinence in individuals' natural environment. METHODS: Eligible treatment-seeking smokers (N = 90) were randomized to (1) usual care and ecological monitoring with abstinence reinforcement (mHealth reinforcement) or (2) without reinforcement (mHealth monitoring). Usual care was 8 weeks of transdermal nicotine and twice-weekly telephone counseling. Following training, an interactive voice response system prompted participants to conduct CO tests 1-3 daily at pseudorandom times (7 am to 10 pm) for 4 weeks. When prompted, participants used a study cell phone and CO monitor to complete a CO self-test, video record the process, and submit videos using multimedia messaging. mHealth reinforcement participants could earn prizes for smoking-negative on-time CO tests. The interactive voice response generated preliminary earnings immediately. Earnings were finalized by comparing video records against participants' self-reports. RESULTS: mHealth reinforcement was associated with a greater proportion of smoking-negative CO tests, longest duration of prolonged abstinence, and point-prevalence abstinence during the monitoring/reinforcement phase compared to mHealth monitoring (p < .01, d = 0.8-1.3). Follow-up (weeks 4-24) analyses indicated main effects of reinforcement on point-prevalence abstinence and proportion of days smoked (p ≤ .05); values were comparable by week 24. CONCLUSIONS: mHealth reinforcement has short-term efficacy. Research on methods to enhance and sustain benefits is needed. IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests that mHealth abstinence reinforcement is efficacious and may present temporal and spatial opportunities to research, engage, and support smokers trying to quit that do not exist with conventional (not technology-based) reinforcement interventions.
INTRODUCTION: Abstinence reinforcement is efficacious for improving smoking treatment outcomes, but practical constraints related to the need for multiple in-person carbon monoxide (CO) breath tests daily to verify smoking abstinence have limited its use. This study tested an mHealth procedure to remotely monitor and reinforce smoking abstinence in individuals' natural environment. METHODS: Eligible treatment-seeking smokers (N = 90) were randomized to (1) usual care and ecological monitoring with abstinence reinforcement (mHealth reinforcement) or (2) without reinforcement (mHealth monitoring). Usual care was 8 weeks of transdermal nicotine and twice-weekly telephone counseling. Following training, an interactive voice response system prompted participants to conduct CO tests 1-3 daily at pseudorandom times (7 am to 10 pm) for 4 weeks. When prompted, participants used a study cell phone and CO monitor to complete a CO self-test, video record the process, and submit videos using multimedia messaging. mHealth reinforcement participants could earn prizes for smoking-negative on-time CO tests. The interactive voice response generated preliminary earnings immediately. Earnings were finalized by comparing video records against participants' self-reports. RESULTS: mHealth reinforcement was associated with a greater proportion of smoking-negative CO tests, longest duration of prolonged abstinence, and point-prevalence abstinence during the monitoring/reinforcement phase compared to mHealth monitoring (p < .01, d = 0.8-1.3). Follow-up (weeks 4-24) analyses indicated main effects of reinforcement on point-prevalence abstinence and proportion of days smoked (p ≤ .05); values were comparable by week 24. CONCLUSIONS: mHealth reinforcement has short-term efficacy. Research on methods to enhance and sustain benefits is needed. IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests that mHealth abstinence reinforcement is efficacious and may present temporal and spatial opportunities to research, engage, and support smokers trying to quit that do not exist with conventional (not technology-based) reinforcement interventions.
Authors: John R Hughes; Josue P Keely; Ray S Niaura; Deborah J Ossip-Klein; Robyn L Richmond; Gary E Swan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah H Heil; Stephen T Higgins; Ira M Bernstein; Laura J Solomon; Randall E Rogers; Colleen S Thomas; Gary J Badger; Mary Ellen Lynch Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jeffrey S Hertzberg; Vickie L Carpenter; Angela C Kirby; Patrick S Calhoun; Scott D Moore; Michelle F Dennis; Paul A Dennis; Eric A Dedert; Jean C Beckham Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Yukiko Washio; Alexa A Lopez; Sarah H Heil; Laura J Solomon; Mary Ellen Lynch; Jennifer D Hanson; Tara M Higgins; Joan M Skelly; Ryan Redner; Ira M Bernstein Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: August F Holtyn; Forrest Toegel; Matthew D Novak; Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos; Michael Fingerhood; Kenneth Silverman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Huyen Phuc Do; Bach Xuan Tran; Quyen Le Pham; Long Hoang Nguyen; Tung Thanh Tran; Carl A Latkin; Michael P Dunne; Philip Ra Baker Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: K S Bagot; S A Matthews; M Mason; Lindsay M Squeglia; J Fowler; K Gray; M Herting; A May; I Colrain; J Godino; S Tapert; S Brown; K Patrick Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 6.464