| Literature DB >> 27613328 |
Lei Kang1, Qi-Shuang He1, Wei He2, Xiang-Zhen Kong1, Wen-Xiu Liu1, Wen-Jing Wu1, Yi-Long Li1, Xin-Yu Lan1, Fu-Liu Xu3.
Abstract
The temporal-spatial distributions of DDT-related contaminants (DDXs), including DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), DDE (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) and DDD (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane), in the sediments of Lake Chaohu and their influencing factors were studied. p,p-DDE and p,p-DDD were found to be the two dominant components of DDXs in both surface and core sediments. The parent DDT compounds were still detectable in sediment cores after the late 1930s. Historical usage of technical DDT was identified as the primary source of DDXs in sediments, as indicated by DDT/(DDD + DDE) ratios of less than one. The residual levels of DDXs were higher in the surface and core sediments in the western lake area than in other lake areas, which might be due to the combined inflow effects of municipal sewage, industrial wastewater and agricultural runoff. The DDX residues in the sediment cores reached peak values in the late 1970s or early 1980s. There were significant positive relationships between DDX residues in sediment cores with annual DDT production and with fine particulate sizes (<4.5 μm). The relationship between the DDXs and TOC in sediment was complex, as indicated by the significant differences among the surface and core sediments. The algae-derived organic matter significantly influenced the amount of residue, composition and distribution of DDXs in the sediments. The DDD/DDE ratios responded well to the anaerobic conditions in the sediments that were caused by algal blooms after the late 1970s in the western lake area. This suggests that the algae-derived organic matter was an important factor and served as a biomarker of eutrophication and also affected the DDX residues and lifecycle in the lake ecosystem.Entities:
Keywords: Algal bloom; DDXs; Influencing factors; Lake Chaohu; Sediment; Source apportionment; Temporal-spatial distribution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27613328 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071