Literature DB >> 27613105

Differences in the Rate of in Situ Mammary Gland Development and Other Developmental Endpoints in Three Strains of Female Rat Commonly Used in Mammary Carcinogenesis Studies: Implications for Timing of Carcinogen Exposure.

Jason P Stanko1, Grace E Kissling2, Vesna A Chappell1, Suzanne E Fenton3.   

Abstract

The potential of chemicals to alter susceptibility to mammary tumor formation is often assessed using a carcinogen-induced study design in various rat strains. The rate of mammary gland (MG) development must be considered so that the timing of carcinogen administration is impactful. In this study, in situ MG development was assessed in females of the Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Hsd:SD), Charles River Sprague-Dawley (Crl:SD), and Charles River Long-Evans (Crl:LE) rat strains at postnatal days 25, 33, and 45. Development was evaluated by physical assessment of growth parameters, developmental scoring, and quantitative morphometric analysis. Although body weight (BW) was consistently lower and day of vaginal opening (VO) occurred latest in female Hsd:SD rats, they exhibited accelerated pre- and peripubertal MG development compared to other strains. Glands of Crl:SD and Crl:LE rats exhibited significantly more terminal end buds (TEBs) and TEB/mm than Hsd:SD rats around the time of VO. These data suggest a considerable difference in the rate of MG development across commonly used strains, which is independent of BW and timing of VO. In mammary tumor induction studies employing these strains, administration of the carcinogen should be timed appropriately, based on strain, to specifically target the peak of TEB occurrence.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal models; carcinogenesis; development; epithelium; female reproduction; mammary gland; rat.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27613105      PMCID: PMC5035587          DOI: 10.1177/0192623316655222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  65 in total

Review 1.  Cellular expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in mammary glands: regulation by hormones, development and aging.

Authors:  G Shyamala; Y-C Chou; S G Louie; R C Guzman; G H Smith; S Nandi
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 2.  Establishing a framework for the functional mammary gland: from endocrinology to morphology.

Authors:  Russell C Hovey; Josephine F Trott; Barbara K Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 3.  Think globally, act locally: the making of a mouse mammary gland.

Authors:  L Hennighausen; G W Robinson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals targeting estrogen receptor signaling: identification and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Erin K Shanle; Wei Xu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  The use of Markov chains to detect subtle variation in reproductive cycling.

Authors:  D M Girard; D B Sager
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Developmental stage of the rat mammary gland as determinant of its susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene.

Authors:  I H Russo; J Russo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Leptin is a metabolic gate for the onset of puberty in the female rat.

Authors:  C C Cheung; J E Thornton; J L Kuijper; D S Weigle; D K Clifton; R A Steiner
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Prenatal TCDD and predisposition to mammary cancer in the rat.

Authors:  N M Brown; P A Manzolillo; J X Zhang; J Wang; C A Lamartiniere
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  A "quickscore" method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  S Detre; G Saclani Jotti; M Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  DDT Exposure in Utero and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Barbara A Cohn; Michele La Merrill; Nickilou Y Krigbaum; Gregory Yeh; June-Soo Park; Lauren Zimmermann; Piera M Cirillo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 6.134

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Best practices to quantify the impact of reproductive toxicants on development, function, and diseases of the rodent mammary gland.

Authors:  Klara Matouskova; Gillian K Szabo; Jessica Daum; Suzanne E Fenton; Sofie Christiansen; Ana M Soto; Jennifer E Kay; Bethsaida Cardona; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Mammary Gland Evaluation in Juvenile Toxicity Studies: Temporal Developmental Patterns in the Male and Female Harlan Sprague-Dawley Rat.

Authors:  Adam J Filgo; Julie F Foley; Samantha Puvanesarajah; Aditi R Borde; Bentley R Midkiff; Casey E Reed; Vesna A Chappell; Lydia B Alexander; Pretish R Borde; Melissa A Troester; Schantel A Hayes Bouknight; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Effect of Arrabidaea chica extract against chemically induced breast cancer in animal model.

Authors:  Keyla Borges Ferreira Rocha; Cláudia Nunes Oliveira; Ítalo Medeiros Azevedo; Robson de Macedo; Aldo Cunha Medeiros
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.