Literature DB >> 27613011

Efficacy of intraoperative direct electrical stimulation of the spinal root and measurement of distal motor latency in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Takao Murohashi1, Mitsunori Yoshimoto2, Tsuneo Takebayashi3, Shuichi Hashimoto1, Shouto Yamada1, Hiroyuki Takashima4, Toshihiko Yamashita3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The measurement of distal motor latency (DML) is an established method for diagnosing entrapment peripheral neuropathy. DML can also serve as an index for disease severity and prognosis. We considered that measuring DML could be useful in estimating the severity of spinal root impairment and predicting prognosis in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative direct electrical stimulation of the spinal root and the measurement of DML in LSS.
METHODS: In 39 patients with LSS, a total of 93 spinal roots were stimulated, and evoked electromyography was recorded at the leg muscles after decompression. DML was measured and its correlation with clinical severity, as evaluated by Zurich claudication questionnaire (ZCQ) and Short Form 36 (SF-36), was investigated.
RESULTS: For the stimulation of the L3, L4, and L5 spinal root, the mean DML (ms) were 6.8 (±1.4), 7.4 (±1.3), and 6.0 (±1.3) in gluteus medius, 9.3 (±1.5), 9.2 (±1.5), and 9.0 (±1.6) in biceps femoris, 9.7 (±1.0), 9.8 (±1.8), and 9.4 (±1.2) in vastus medialis, 16.1 (±1.0), 14.7 (±1.3), and 14.1 (±1.5) in tibialis anterior, and 16.4 (±1.4), 14.3 (±1.8), and 13.9 (±1.9) in gastrocnemius muscles. Statistically significant positive correlations were observed between DML and height. Preoperative symptom and function scores of ZCQ and postoperative bodily pain scores of SF-36 were significantly worse in the patients with prolonged DML.
CONCLUSIONS: DML is thought to be useful for estimating the severity of spinal root impairment and for predicting the prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal motor latency; Lumbar foraminal stenosis; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Prognostic factor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27613011     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4772-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Time course and predictors of median nerve conduction after carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Mitchell B Rotman; Bobby V Enkvetchakul; J Thomas Megerian; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. An anatomic investigation.

Authors:  C Chotigavanich; S Sawangnatra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression.

Authors:  J Kunogi; M Hasue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan.

Authors:  S Fukuhara; S Bito; J Green; A Hsiao; K Kurokawa
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Theumann; Alexandre Burn; Rosamond Tansey; Douglas Wardlaw; Francis W Smith; Gerit Kulik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  "Pseudoclaudication" syndrome produced by compression of the cauda equina.

Authors:  G J Kavanaugh; H J Svien; C B Holman; R M Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The myotomes L2--S2 in man.

Authors:  O Thage
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  1965

8.  Intraoperative changes in motor nerve conduction latency in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  W W Eversmann; J A Ritsick
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  M Mondelli; F Reale; F Sicurelli; L Padua
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2000-04

10.  Vasogenic edema induced by compression injury to the spinal nerve root. Distribution of intravenously injected protein tracers and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; H Yoshizawa; Y Hachiya; T Ukai; T Morita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  F-waves of peroneal and tibial nerves in the differential diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of L5 and S1 radiculopathies.

Authors:  Chaojun Zheng; Jingjuan Liang; Cong Nie; Yu Zhu; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Marco Crostelli; Marco Grimaldi; Osvaldo Mazza; Carla Anania; Maurizio Fornari; Francesco Costa
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.