E Greze1, M Benard2, I Hamon1, C Casper2, F E Haddad1, M-J Boutroy1, J-M Hascoët3. 1. Neonatology, Maternite Regionale, EA3450 Université de Lorraine, 10 Rue du Docteur Heydenreich, 54035, Nancy, France. 2. Neonatology, Children's Hospital, 330 Avenue de Grande-Bretagne, TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France. 3. Neonatology, Maternite Regionale, EA3450 Université de Lorraine, 10 Rue du Docteur Heydenreich, 54035, Nancy, France. j.hascoet@chru-nancy.fr.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Doxapram is used as a third-line treatment for apnea unresponsive to caffeine and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare the effects of dosing adjusted for gender and postmenstrual age (PMA) (GrA) versus infants' weight alone (GrW) on doxapram plasma levels, clinical efficacy, and side effects. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind study, including premature infants for whom optimized caffeine and CPAP therapy for apnea of prematurity had failed. Failure was defined as the persistence of more than one significant apnea per hour over an 8-h period. Plasma levels of doxapram and ketodoxapram were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 48 h after the onset of treatment. Dosing aimed to maintain the combined doxapram and ketodoxapram plasma level in the therapeutic range of 1.5-4 mg/l. Infants were followed-up for 4 days after the onset of treatment. RESULTS:A total of 85 infants were included: 46 in GrW (27.7 ± 1.9 weeks' gestational age [GA]), 39 in GrA (27.9 ± 1.4 weeks' GA); available plasma levels showed that 25 of 40 in the GrW group and 27 of 37 in the GrA group had levels within the therapeutic range (p = 0.344). Of note, plasma level variance was significantly higher in GrW for doxapram + ketodoxapram (1.87 vs. 0.89; p = 0.028). Clinical efficacy was better in the GrA group, with a reduction from 32 to 3 of 38 (76 %) infants with significant apnea versus 30 to 5 of 45 (56 %) in the GrW group (p < 0.001). No adverse effects were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Taking gender and PMA into account for doxapram dosing did not significantly increase the number of infants with a plasma level in the therapeutic range. However, it improved plasma level stability and clinical efficacy without adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00389909.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION:Doxapram is used as a third-line treatment for apnea unresponsive to caffeine and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare the effects of dosing adjusted for gender and postmenstrual age (PMA) (GrA) versus infants' weight alone (GrW) on doxapram plasma levels, clinical efficacy, and side effects. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind study, including premature infants for whom optimized caffeine and CPAP therapy for apnea of prematurity had failed. Failure was defined as the persistence of more than one significant apnea per hour over an 8-h period. Plasma levels of doxapram and ketodoxapram were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 48 h after the onset of treatment. Dosing aimed to maintain the combined doxapram and ketodoxapram plasma level in the therapeutic range of 1.5-4 mg/l. Infants were followed-up for 4 days after the onset of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 85 infants were included: 46 in GrW (27.7 ± 1.9 weeks' gestational age [GA]), 39 in GrA (27.9 ± 1.4 weeks' GA); available plasma levels showed that 25 of 40 in the GrW group and 27 of 37 in the GrA group had levels within the therapeutic range (p = 0.344). Of note, plasma level variance was significantly higher in GrW for doxapram + ketodoxapram (1.87 vs. 0.89; p = 0.028). Clinical efficacy was better in the GrA group, with a reduction from 32 to 3 of 38 (76 %) infants with significant apnea versus 30 to 5 of 45 (56 %) in the GrW group (p < 0.001). No adverse effects were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Taking gender and PMA into account for doxapram dosing did not significantly increase the number of infants with a plasma level in the therapeutic range. However, it improved plasma level stability and clinical efficacy without adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00389909.
Authors: D Fanni; R Ambu; C Gerosa; S Nemolato; M Castagnola; P Van Eyken; G Faa; V Fanos Journal: Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol Date: 2014 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.219
Authors: Christine H Ten Hove; Roseanne J Vliegenthart; Arjan B Te Pas; Emma Brouwer; Monique Rijken; Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis; Anton H van Kaam; Wes Onland Journal: Neonatology Date: 2016-03-12 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Leeann R Pavlek; Brian K Rivera; Charles V Smith; Joanie Randle; Cory Hanlon; Kristi Small; Edward F Bell; Matthew A Rysavy; Sara Conroy; Carl H Backes Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 6.314
Authors: Joseph Pergolizzi; Alexander Kraus; Peter Magnusson; Frank Breve; Kailyn Mitchell; Robert Raffa; Jo Ann K LeQuang; Giustino Varrassi Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-01-31
Authors: Robert B Flint; Sinno H P Simons; Peter Andriessen; Kian D Liem; Pieter L J Degraeuwe; Irwin K M Reiss; Rob Ter Heine; Aline G J Engbers; Birgit C P Koch; Ronald de Groot; David M Burger; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Swantje Völler Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 3.756