| Literature DB >> 27612851 |
Yuu Tanaka1, Masahiko Kawaguchi2, Yoshinori Noguchi3, Kenji Yoshitani4, Mikito Kawamata5, Kenichi Masui6, Takeo Nakayama7, Yoshitugu Yamada8.
Abstract
Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring has been used to prevent neurological complications such as paraplegia in patients who underwent thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA/TAAA) surgery. The object of this study was making a systematic review to survey the performance of MEP monitoring during TAA/TAAA open repair surgery. We searched electronic databases for relevant studies. We summarized the diagnostic data with summary sensitivity, summary specificity and forest plots of pooled sensitivity, and conducted sub-group analysis. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. We also surveyed the reporting rate of clinical key factors such as methods of anesthesia, surgery, and success rate of MEP. Nineteen studies met our criteria. The results of meta-analysis showed 89.1 % summary sensitivity (95 % confidence interval 47.9-98.6 %) and 99.3 % summary specificity (95 % confidence interval 96.1-99.9 %). Sub-group analysis of pooled sensitivity and specificity by all-or-none cut-off point were better than other cut-off points. The results of the QUADAS-2 were not good. The performance of MEP monitoring was good for detecting postoperative paraplegia in TAA/TAAA open repair surgery. The cut-off point of all-or-none may be the best, according to our review.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostic meta-analysis; Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring; Systematic review; TAAA open repair
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27612851 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-016-2242-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anesth ISSN: 0913-8668 Impact factor: 2.078