Literature DB >> 27612741

Injectable porous nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/tripolyphosphate scaffolds with improved compressive strength for bone regeneration.

Suren P Uswatta1, Israel U Okeke1, Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya2.   

Abstract

In this study we have fabricated porous injectable spherical scaffolds using chitosan biopolymer, sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA). TPP was primarily used as an ionic crosslinker to crosslink nHA/chitosan droplets. We hypothesized that incorporating nHA into chitosan could support osteoconduction by emulating the mineralized cortical bone structure, and improve the Ultimate Compressive Strength (UCS) of the scaffolds. We prepared chitosan solutions with 0.5%, 1% and 2% (w/v) nHA concentration and used simple coacervation and lyophilization techniques to obtain spherical scaffolds. Lyophilized spherical scaffolds had a mean diameter of 1.33mm (n=25). Further, portion from each group lyophilized scaffolds were soaked and dried to obtain Lyophilized Soaked and Dried (LSD) scaffolds. LSD scaffolds had a mean diameter of 0.93mm (n=25) which is promising property for the injectability. Scanning Electron Microscopy images showed porous surface morphology and interconnected pore structures inside the scaffolds. Lyophilized and LSD scaffolds had surface pores <10 and 2μm, respectively. 2% nHA/chitosan LSD scaffolds exhibited UCS of 8.59MPa compared to UCS of 2% nHA/chitosan lyophilized scaffolds at 3.93MPa. Standardize UCS values were 79.98MPa and 357MPa for 2% nHA/chitosan lyophilized and LSD particles respectively. One-way ANOVA results showed a significant increase (p<0.001) in UCS of 1% and 2% nHA/chitosan lyophilized scaffolds compared to 0% and 0.5% nHA/chitosan lyophilized scaffolds. Moreover, 2% nHA LSD scaffolds had significantly increased (p<0.005) their mean UCS by 120% compared to 2% nHA lyophilized scaffolds. In a drawback, all scaffolds have lost their mechanical properties by 95% on the 2nd day when fully immersed in phosphate buffered saline. Additionally live and dead cell assay showed no cytotoxicity and excellent osteoblast attachment to both lyophilized and LSD scaffolds at the end of 14th day of in vitro studies. 2% nHA/chitosan scaffolds showed higher osteoblast attachment than 0% nHA/chitosan scaffolds.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chitosan; Compressive strength; Mechanical testing; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Osteoblast attachment; Spherical scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27612741      PMCID: PMC5019117          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  36 in total

1.  Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite crystals: a review study on the analytical methods.

Authors:  S Koutsopoulos
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-12-15

Review 2.  Implantable applications of chitin and chitosan.

Authors:  Eugene Khor; Lee Yong Lim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Solaiman Tarafder
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Mechanotransduction in bone repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Chenyu Huang; Rei Ogawa
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Microsphere-based seamless scaffolds containing macroscopic gradients of encapsulated factors for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Milind Singh; Casey P Morris; Ryan J Ellis; Michael S Detamore; Cory Berkland
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 6.  Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications.

Authors:  R Jayakumar; M Prabaharan; P T Sudheesh Kumar; S V Nair; H Tamura
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 14.227

7.  Cross-linked chitosan improves the mechanical properties of calcium phosphate-chitosan cement.

Authors:  Ashkan Aryaei; Jason Liu; Ahalapitiya H Jayatissa; A Champa Jayasuriya
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Mechanical properties, biological activity and protein controlled release by poly(vinyl alcohol)-bioglass/chitosan-collagen composite scaffolds: a bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Weeraphat Pon-On; Narattaphol Charoenphandhu; Jarinthorn Teerapornpuntakit; Jirawan Thongbunchoo; Nateetip Krishnamra; I-Ming Tang
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  Injectable chitosan microparticles incorporating bone morphogenetic protein-7 for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Venkata P Mantripragada; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 10.  Novel chitin and chitosan nanofibers in biomedical applications.

Authors:  R Jayakumar; M Prabaharan; S V Nair; H Tamura
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 14.227

View more
  9 in total

1.  Injectable nanosilica-chitosan microparticles for bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Bipin Gaihre; Beata Lecka-Czernik; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.646

2.  Nano-scale characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated chitosan particles for bone repair.

Authors:  Bipin Gaihre; Suren Uswatta; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.268

3.  Microporosity Clustering Assessment in Calcium Phosphate Bioceramic Particles.

Authors:  Raúl Vallejos Baier; Isabel Benjumeda Wijnhoven; Víctor Irribarra Del Valle; Carola Millán Giovanetti; Juan F Vivanco
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  In-Situ Forming pH and Thermosensitive Injectable Hydrogels to Stimulate Angiogenesis: Potential Candidates for Fast Bone Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Fatma Z Kocak; Abdullah C S Talari; Muhammad Yar; Ihtesham U Rehman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Application Progress of Modified Chitosan and Its Composite Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yuemeng Zhu; Yidi Zhang; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Reconstruction of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects Using Tissue-Engineering Strategies with Injectable and Non-Injectable Scaffolds.

Authors:  Bipin Gaihre; Suren Uswatta; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-11-20

7.  Chitosan/PAMAM/Hydroxyapatite Engineered Drug Release Hydrogels with Tunable Rheological Properties.

Authors:  Alessandro Pistone; Daniela Iannazzo; Consuelo Celesti; Cristina Scolaro; Salvatore V Giofré; Roberto Romeo; Annamaria Visco
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  The Impact of the Ionic Cross-Linking Mode on the Physical and In Vitro Dexamethasone Release Properties of Chitosan/Hydroxyapatite Beads.

Authors:  Maria Jucélia L Dantas; Bárbara Fernanda F Dos Santos; Albaniza A Tavares; Matheus A Maciel; Breno de Medeiros Lucena; Marcus Vinícius L Fook; Suédina Maria de L Silva
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  Novel Inorganic Nanomaterial-Based Therapy for Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Shengjie Cui; Dan Luo; Yan Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.076

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.