Literature DB >> 27612447

An appraisal of meta-analysis guidelines: how do they relate to safety outcomes?

Meg Bennetts1, Ed Whalen2, Sima Ahadieh3, Joseph C Cappelleri4.   

Abstract

Although well developed to assess efficacy questions, meta-analyses and, more generally, systematic reviews, have received less attention in application to safety-related questions. As a result, many open questions remain on how best to apply meta-analyses in the safety setting. This appraisal attempts to: (i) summarize the current guidelines for assessing individual studies, systematic reviews, and network meta-analyses; (ii) describe several publications on safety meta-analytic approaches; and (iii) present some of the questions and issues that arise with safety data. A number of gaps in the current quality guidelines are identified along with issues to consider when performing a safety meta-analysis. While some work is ongoing to provide guidance to improve the quality of safety meta-analyses, this review emphasizes the critical need for better reporting and increased transparency regarding safety data in the systematic review guidelines.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  data quality; meta-analysis; network meta-analysis; safety data; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27612447     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  5 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of rare adverse events in randomized clinical trials: Bayesian and frequentist methods.

Authors:  Hwanhee Hong; Chenguang Wang; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms.

Authors:  Riaz Qureshi; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Tianjing Li
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 7.407

Review 3.  Assessing the quality of meta-analyses in systematic reviews in pharmaceutical research in Iran by 2016: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alireza Amanollahi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Farhad Shokraneh; Yousef Bashiri; Leily Mahmudi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-04-06

4.  Prothrombin complex concentrate versus placebo, no intervention, or other interventions in critically bleeding patients associated with oral anticoagulant administration: a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Christian Ovesen; Jan Purrucker; Christian Gluud; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Hanne Christensen; Thorsten Steiner
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-20

5.  Assessment of the course of acute pancreatitis in the light of aetiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emese Réka Bálint; Gabriella Fűr; Lóránd Kiss; Dávid István Németh; Alexandra Soós; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Benedek Tinusz; Péter Varjú; Áron Vincze; Bálint Erőss; József Czimmer; Zoltán Szepes; Gábor Varga; Zoltán Rakonczay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.