Literature DB >> 27612310

Comparison between group and personal rehabilitation for dementia in a geriatric health service facility: single-blinded randomized controlled study.

Shigeya Tanaka1,2, Shin Honda3, Hajime Nakano3, Yuko Sato2, Kazufumi Araya2, Haruyasu Yamaguchi1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of rehabilitation involving group and personal sessions on demented participants.
METHODS: This single-blinded randomized controlled trial included 60 elderly participants with dementia in a geriatric health service facility, or R oken. Staff members, who did not participate in the intervention, examined cognitive function, mood, communication ability, severity of dementia, objective quality of life, vitality, and daily behaviour. After a baseline assessment, participants were randomly divided into three groups: (i) group intervention; (ii) personal intervention; and (iii) control. The 1-h group intervention (3-5 subjects) and 20-min personal intervention (one staff member per participant) were performed twice a week for 12 weeks (24 total sessions). The cognitive rehabilitation programme consisted of reminiscence, reality orientation, and physical exercise, and it was based on five principles of brain-activating rehabilitation; (i) pleasant atmosphere; (ii) communication; (iii) social roles; (iv) praising; and (v) errorless support. Data were analyzed after the second assessment.
RESULTS: Outcome measures were analyzed in 43 participants-14 in the control group, 13 in group intervention, and 16 in personal intervention. Repeated measure ancova showed a significant interaction for cognitive function score (Mini-Mental State Examination) between group intervention and controls ( F  = 5.535, P = 0.029). In the post-hoc analysis, group intervention showed significant improvement (P = 0.016). Global severity of dementia tended to improve (P = 0.094) in group intervention compared to control (Mann-Whitney U -test). There were no significant interactions or improvements for other measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Group rehabilitation for dementia is more effective for improving cognitive function and global severity of dementia than personal rehabilitation in Roken.
© 2016 Japanese Psychogeriatric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain-activating rehabilitation; dementia; geriatric health service facility; group intervention; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27612310     DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychogeriatrics        ISSN: 1346-3500            Impact factor:   2.440


  5 in total

Review 1.  Reminiscence therapy for dementia.

Authors:  Bob Woods; Laura O'Philbin; Emma M Farrell; Aimee E Spector; Martin Orrell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 2.  Rehabilitation for People Living with Dementia: A Scoping Review of Processes and Outcomes.

Authors:  Maiken B Ravn; Kirsten S Petersen; Jette Thuesen
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2019-06-02

3.  Degree of personalisation in tailored activities and its effect on behavioural and psychological symptoms and quality of life among people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shiyu Lu; Anna Y Zhang; Tianyin Liu; Jacky C P Choy; Maggie S L Ma; Gloria Wong; Terry Lum
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Home-based training technology for persons with dementia: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators for mobility-based training at home.

Authors:  Eva Ladekjær Larsen; Frans Boch Waldorff; Helle Ploug Hansen; Karen la Cour
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  Person-Centered Care in Persons Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Lee; Ji Yeon Lee; Bora Kim
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-04-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.