| Literature DB >> 27612176 |
Marie Toft-Petersen1, Line Nederby2, Eigil Kjeldsen2, Gitte B Kerndrup3, Gordon D Brown4, Peter Hokland2, Anne Stidsholt Roug2.
Abstract
Evidence of distinct disease propagating stem cells in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has emerged in recent years. However, immunophenotypic characterization of these cancer stem cells remains sparse. In acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), we have previously described aberrant expression of the C-type lectin domain family 12, member A (CLEC12A) as a stable and reliable marker of leukaemia blasts and as a tool for assessing minimal residual disease. Furthermore, CLEC12A has been proposed as a promising marker of leukaemic stem cells in AML. The role of CLEC12A in MDS, however, remains to be elucidated. In this study, we found CLEC12A aberrantly expressed on the CD34+ CD38- cell compartment in 71% (22/31) of MDS patients, distributed across all Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk groups. We showed that the CD34+ CD38- CLEC12A+ cells were indeed malignant and possessed functional stem cell properties in the long-term colony-initiating cell assay. As opposed to reported findings in AML, we showed that cancer stem cells from MDS samples derived from both CLEC12A positive and negative CD34+ CD38- subpopulations. Due to the absence of CLEC12A on normal haematopoietic stem cells, CLEC12A stem cell immunophenotyping may contribute to diagnosing and monitoring MDS patients and could furthermore add knowledge about disease propagating cells in MDS.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990hMICLzzm321990; CD371; LTC-IC; cancer stem cells; myelodysplastic syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27612176 PMCID: PMC5091626 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998
Patient characteristics
| Patient no. | WHO subtype | Clonal chromosomal abnormalities detected | IPSS‐R Risk group | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A+/ CD34+CD38− | AML‐free survival (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAEB‐1 | No aberrations | LOW | 0% | |
| 2 | RAEB‐1 | No aberrations | INT | 0% | 605 |
| 3 | RCMD | No aberrations | V‐LOW | 0% | |
| 4 | RCUD | +8 | LOW | 37·9% | 1169 |
| 5 | RAEB‐1 | inv(3)(p12q26) | V‐HIGH | 6·3% | 583 |
| 6 | RAEB‐1 | No aberrations | INT | 56·7% | 16 |
| 7 | RCUD | Complex | INT | 0% | |
| 8 | RAEB‐1 | +del(1)(p13), +8 | INT | 1·5% | 658 |
| 9 | RCUD | No aberrations | V‐LOW | 17·4% | 154 |
| 10 | NA | ND | NA | 1·8% | 713 |
| 11 | Hypo RCUD | No aberrations | LOW | 4·1% | 91 |
| 12 | RAEB‐1 | No aberrations | HIGH | 0% | |
| 13 | RAEB‐1 | No aberrations | INT | 6·4% | |
| 14 | RCUD | ‐X | INT | 22·6% | |
| 15 | RCUD | No aberrations | LOW | 11·6% | |
| 16 | RCUD | No aberrations | V‐LOW | 14·7% | |
| 17 | RARS | No aberrations | LOW | 0% | |
| 18 | MDS‐U | No aberrations | LOW | 3·2% | 210 |
| 19 | RAEB‐2 | No aberrations | HIGH | 4·3% | |
| 20 | RCUD | del(15)(q22q26) | HIGH | 5·6% | |
| 21 | RAEB‐2 | Complex, incl. del(5q)(q13q33),‐7 | V‐HIGH | 0·6% | 55 |
| 22 | RCUD | ‐7 | INT | 5·6% | |
| 23 | RCUD | No aberrations | LOW | 1·2% | |
| 24 | RCUD | No aberrations | V‐LOW | 6·8% | 405 |
| 25 | MDS‐U | +mar | LOW | 0% | 670 |
| 26 | RCUD | No aberrations | INT | 0% | 554 |
| 27 | RCUD | ‐Y | V‐LOW | 0% | |
| 28 | RCUD | No aberrations | V‐LOW | 7·4% | |
| 29 | RCUD | +8 | INT | 12·0% | 482 |
| 30 | RCMD | Complex, incl. ‐5, ‐7 | NA | 17·4% | |
| 31 | Del(5q) | del(5)(q13q31) | INT | 0·1% |
AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; INT, intermediate; IPSS‐R, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS‐U, myelodysplastic syndrome – unclassified; NA, not applicable; ND, not done; RAEB‐1, refractory anaemia with excess blasts type 1; RAEB‐2, refractory anaemia with excess blasts type 2; RARS, refractory anaemia with ringed sideroblasts; RCMD, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia; RCUD, refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia; V‐HIGH, Very High; V‐LOW, Very Low; WHO, World Health Organization.
Insufficient material for complete morphological evaluation.
Figure 1CLEC12A expression on the CD34+ CD38− stem cell subset. (A) Gating strategy (MDS Patient 9). In the first panel, the CD45low/SSClow population was defined. Next, the CD34+ CD38− population was gated and analysed for the presence/absence of CLEC12A. The last panel shows the CD34+ CD38− CLEC12A+ population back‐gated into the CD34+ CD38− plot. (B) CLEC12A expression on the CD34+ CD38− cell subset in normal bone marrow (NBM), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), CD34‐positive (CD34+) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and CD34‐negative (CD34−) AML, respectively. (C) CLEC12A expression on the CD34+ CD38− cell subset according to IPSS‐R risk groups. Filled symbols indicate later progression to AML.
Results from LTC‐IC and subsequent FISH analyses
| Patient | Targeted chromosomal aberrations (FISH probe locus) | Sorted subsets | Seeded in LTC‐IC | CFC count | FISH positivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erythroid | Myeloid | |||||
| MDS 8 | +1q (CEP1) and +8 (SE8) | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A+ | 19 | 0 | 24 | 10/10 (100%) |
| CD34+CD38−CLEC12A− | 500 | 1 | 410 | 10/10 (100%) | ||
| MDS 29 | +8 (MYC) | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A+ | 146 | 0 | 40 | 7/7 (100%) |
| CD34+CD38−CLEC12A− | 500 | 2 | 34 | 2/10 (20%) | ||
| MDS 30 | ‐5 (EGR1) and ‐7 (D7S486,D7S522) | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A+ | 500 | 0 | 245 | 10/10 (100%) |
| CD34+CD38−CLEC12A− | 500 | 0 | 438 | 10/10 (100%) | ||
| MDS 31 | ‐5 (EGR1) | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A+ | 123 | 0 | 1 | No cells |
| CD34+CD38−CLEC12A− | 500 | 0 | 63 | 7/7 (100%) | ||
| NBM 1 | (CEP1), (SE8) | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A− | 500 | 2 | 19 | No aberrations |
| NBM 2 | (EGR1), (D7S486,D7S522) | CD34+CD38−CLEC12A− | 500 | 4 | 28 | No aberrations |
CFC, colony‐forming cell; CFU‐GEMM, colony‐forming unit‐granulocyte/erythroid/macrophage/megakaryocyte; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; LTC‐IC, long‐term colony initiating cell assay; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NBM, normal bone marrow.
Mean CFC count of 2–3 plates normalized to 500 cells, when ≥500 cells originally seeded in LTC‐IC.
FISH‐negative CFCs were morphologically normal.
Scattered cells.
In addition 1 CFU‐GEMM.
NBM served as negative controls for all of the applied FISH‐probes.
Figure 2LTC‐IC and confirmatory FISH. (A) Representative colony‐forming cells (CFC) from the CD34+ CD38− CLEC12A+ subset in MDS Patient 30. The colony is smaller and contains fewer cells than myeloid colonies from normal bone marrow (NBM). (B) Representative CFC from NBM. (C) Confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridization using the D1Z5 probe (red) and centromeric D8Z1 probe (green) confirming the trisomy 1 and 8 aberrations (MDS Patient 8) in interphase nuclei (3R3G signal pattern) in a cell from the CD34+ CD38− CLEC12A+ and CD34+ CD38− CLEC12A− derived colonies, respectively.