Literature DB >> 27611928

Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Individuals Aged 80 and Older: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Charalampis Giannadakis1,2, Ole Solheim3,4,5, Asgeir S Jakola3,6, Trond Nordseth7,8, Agnete M Gulati4,9, Ulf S Nerland3,4, Øystein P Nygaard3,4,10,11, Tore K Solberg11,12, Sasha Gulati3,4,10,13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in individuals aged 80 and older with those of individuals aged 18-79.
DESIGN: Prospective data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
SETTING: Multicenter observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with central LSS undergoing surgery at 36 orthopedic or neurosurgical departments (N = 1,503; 1,325 aged <80 (median 66, range 21-79); 178 aged ≥80 (median 82, range 80-95)). INTERVENTION: Laminectomy or microdecompression. MEASUREMENTS: Changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), back pain numerical rating scale (NRS), and leg pain NRS at 1 year. Complications and duration of surgical procedures and hospital stays are reported.
RESULTS: For all participants, there was a significant improvement in ODI (difference 16.60 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.59-17.61, P < .001). There were no differences between age cohorts in mean changes in ODI (0.2, 95% CI = -3.05-3.39, P = .92), EQ-5D (0.02, 95% CI = -0.04-0.09, P = .49), back pain NRS (-0.2, 95% CI = -0.7-0.4, P = .56), or leg pain NRS (-0.1, 95% CI = -0.7-0.5), P = .77). There were no differences in perioperative complications between age cohorts (4.9% vs 7.9%, P = .11). Participants aged 80 and older reported more complications occurring within 3 months (11.8% vs 7.5%, P = .02), mainly because of more urinary tract infections (9.6% vs 3.5%, P = .001). Mean duration of hospital stays was 1.3 days longer for participants aged 80 and (4.5 vs 3.2 days, P < .001). There were no differences in duration of single-level microdecompression (P = .94), two-level microdecompression (P = .53), single-level laminectomy (P = .78), or two-level laminectomy (P = .08).
CONCLUSION: Individuals aged 80 and older experience improvement in self-reported outcomes similar to those of younger individuals after decompressive surgery for LSS.
© 2016, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2016, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neurosurgical procedures; quality of life; self-reported outcomes; spinal stenosis; spondylosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27611928     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  10 in total

1.  Lumbar microdecompression in elderly versus general adult patients: Comparable outcomes and costs despite group differences.

Authors:  Ziyad O Knio; Samuel Rosas; Michael S Schallmo; Suman Medda; Tadhg J O'Gara
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

2.  Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients over 80: is there an increased risk?

Authors:  Frédérick Rault; Anaïs R Briant; Hervé Kamga; Thomas Gaberel; Evelyne Emery
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  SUcceSS, SUrgery for Spinal Stenosis: protocol of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  David B Anderson; Manuela L Ferreira; Ian A Harris; Gavin A Davis; Ralph Stanford; David Beard; Qiang Li; Stephen Jan; Ralph J Mobbs; Christopher G Maher; Renata Yong; Tara Zammit; Jane Latimer; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Current concepts and recent advances in understanding and managing lumbar spine stenosis.

Authors:  Carlos Bagley; Matthew MacAllister; Luke Dosselman; Jessica Moreno; Salah G Aoun; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-31

5.  Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Helle Algren Brøgger; Thomas Maribo; Robin Christensen; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Clinical Comparison of Full-Endoscopic and Microscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in the Treatment of Elderly Lumbar Spinal stenosis: A Retrospective Study with 12-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Rigao Chen; Dangwei Gu; Qingqing Ye; Wei Liu; Jianhua Qi; Kai Xu; Xiaohong Fan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy in the elderly: a nationwide registry-based observational study with patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Tonje Okkenhaug Johansen; Vetle Vangen-Lønne; Siril T Holmberg; Øyvind O Salvesen; Tore K Solberg; Agnete M Gulati; Øystein P Nygaard; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Patient selection protocols for endoscopic transforaminal, interlaminar, and translaminar decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Álvaro Dowling; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Fabio Henrique Pinto da Silva; Jaime Andrés Araneda Parra; Daniela Molero Portillo; Yohanna Carolina Pineda Giménez
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Validation of intracranial hemorrhage in the Norwegian Patient Registry.

Authors:  Lise R Øie; Mattis A Madsbu; Charalampis Giannadakis; Anders Vorhaug; Heidi Jensberg; Øyvind Salvesen; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery Among Octogenarians: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Study From 2004 to 2013.

Authors:  Stephanie T Kha; Haariss Ilyas; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Edward C Benzel; Michael P Steinmetz; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-03-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.