Naomi R George1, Jennifer Kryworuchko2, Katherine M Hunold3, Kei Ouchi4, Amy Berman5, Rebecca Wright6, Corita R Grudzen6, Olga Kovalerchik7, Eric M LeFebvre8, Rachel A Lindor9, Tammie E Quest10, Terri A Schmidt11, Tamara Sussman12, Amy Vandenbroucke13, Angelo E Volandes14, Timothy F Platts-Mills15. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI. 2. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 3. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 5. Hartford Program Officer/Patient Representative, New York, NY. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine, Geriatric Fellow, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 10. Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 11. Departments of Emergency Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 12. School of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 13. National POLST Paradigm, Portland, OR. 14. Section of General Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 15. Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the optimal use of shared decision making (SDM) to guide palliative and end-of-life decisions in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to convene a working group to develop a set of research questions that, when answered, will substantially advance the ability of clinicians to use SDM to guide palliative and end-of-life care decisions in the ED. METHODS: Participants were identified based on expertise in emergency, palliative, or geriatrics care; policy or patient-advocacy; and spanned physician, nursing, social work, legal, and patient perspectives. Input from the group was elicited using a time-staggered Delphi process including three teleconferences, an open platform for asynchronous input, and an in-person meeting to obtain a final round of input from all members and to identify and resolve or describe areas of disagreement. CONCLUSION: Key research questions identified by the group related to which ED patients are likely to benefit from palliative care (PC), what interventions can most effectively promote PC in the ED, what outcomes are most appropriate to assess the impact of these interventions, what is the potential for initiating advance care planning in the ED to help patients define long-term goals of care, and what policies influence palliative and end-of-life care decision making in the ED. Answers to these questions have the potential to substantially improve the quality of care for ED patients with advanced illness.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the optimal use of shared decision making (SDM) to guide palliative and end-of-life decisions in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to convene a working group to develop a set of research questions that, when answered, will substantially advance the ability of clinicians to use SDM to guide palliative and end-of-life care decisions in the ED. METHODS:Participants were identified based on expertise in emergency, palliative, or geriatrics care; policy or patient-advocacy; and spanned physician, nursing, social work, legal, and patient perspectives. Input from the group was elicited using a time-staggered Delphi process including three teleconferences, an open platform for asynchronous input, and an in-person meeting to obtain a final round of input from all members and to identify and resolve or describe areas of disagreement. CONCLUSION: Key research questions identified by the group related to which ED patients are likely to benefit from palliative care (PC), what interventions can most effectively promote PC in the ED, what outcomes are most appropriate to assess the impact of these interventions, what is the potential for initiating advance care planning in the ED to help patients define long-term goals of care, and what policies influence palliative and end-of-life care decision making in the ED. Answers to these questions have the potential to substantially improve the quality of care for ED patients with advanced illness.
Authors: Kei Ouchi; Naomi George; Jeremiah D Schuur; Emily L Aaronson; Charlotta Lindvall; Edward Bernstein; Rebecca L Sudore; Mara A Schonberg; Susan D Block; James A Tulsky Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kelly C Vranas; Amber L Lin; Dana Zive; Susan W Tolle; Scott D Halpern; Christopher G Slatore; Craig Newgard; Robert Y Lee; Erin K Kross; Donald R Sullivan Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kei Ouchi; Guruprasad D Jambaulikar; Samuel Hohmann; Naomi R George; Emily L Aaronson; Rebecca Sudore; Mara A Schonberg; James A Tulsky; Jeremiah D Schuur; Daniel J Pallin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amy C Robertson; Leslie C Fowler; Jon Niconchuk; Michael Kreger; Elizabeth Rickerson; Nicholas Sadovnikoff; David L Hepner; Angela M Bader; Matthew D Mcevoy; Richard D Urman Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2019-01-01
Authors: Bonnie J Siry; Evan Polzer; Faris Omeragic; Christopher E Knoepke; Daniel D Matlock; Marian E Betz Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 7.587
Authors: Justin K Brooten; Alyssa S Buckenheimer; Joy K Hallmark; Carl R Grey; David M Cline; Candace J Breznau; Tyler S McQueen; Zvi J Harris; David Welsh; Jeff D Williamson; Jennifer L Gabbard Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-07-08