Literature DB >> 27611678

Hypercompetition in biomedical research evaluation and its impact on young scientist careers.

Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin1.   

Abstract

Recent years have seen tremendous changes in the modes of publication and dissemination of biomedical information, with the introduction of countless new publishers and publishing models, as well as alternative modes of research evaluation. In parallel, we are witnessing an unsustainable explosion in the amount of information generated by each individual scientist, at the same time as many countries' shrinking research budgets are greatly increasing the competition for research funding. In such a hypercompetitive environment, how does one measure excellence? This contribution will provide an overview of some of the ongoing changes in authorship practices in the biomedical sciences, and also the consequences of hypercompetition to the careers of young scientists, from the perspective of a tenured young faculty member in the biomedical sciences. It will also provide some suggestions as to alternate dissemination and evaluation practices that could reverse current trends. [Int Microbiol 18(4):253-261 (2015)]. Copyright© by the Spanish Society for Microbiology and Institute for Catalan Studies.

Keywords:  biomedical publications; excellence evaluation; information overload; research competition; young scientists careers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27611678     DOI: 10.2436/20.1501.01.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Microbiol        ISSN: 1139-6709            Impact factor:   2.479


  1 in total

1.  Postdocs' advice on pursuing a research career in academia: A qualitative analysis of free-text survey responses.

Authors:  Suwaiba Afonja; Damonie G Salmon; Shadelia I Quailey; W Marcus Lambert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.