Literature DB >> 27610920

Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone.

Mathieu Van der Aerschot1, De Wet Swanepoel1,2,3,4, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail1, Herman Carel Myburgh5, Robert Henry Eikelboom1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the Sennheiser HD 202 II supra-aural headphones as an alternative headphone to enable more affordable hearing screening.
DESIGN: Study 1 measured the equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) of the Sennheiser HD 202 II. Study 2 evaluated the attenuation of the headphones. Study 3 determined headphone characteristics by analyzing the total harmonic distortion (THD), frequency response and force of the headband. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-five participants were included in study 1 and 15 in study 2 with ages ranging between 18 and 25. No participants were involved in study 3.
RESULTS: The Sennheiser HD 202 II ETSPLs (250-16000 Hz) showed no significant effects on ETSPL for ear laterality, gender or age. Attenuation was not significantly different (p > 0.01) to TDH 39 except at 8000 Hz (p < 0.01). Maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANL) were specified accordingly. The force of the headband was 3.1N. THD measurements showed that between 500 and 8000 Hz intensities of 90 dB HL and higher can be reached without THD >3%.
CONCLUSION: Sennheiser HD 202 II supra-aural headphones can be used as an affordable headphone for screening audiometry provided reported MPANLs, maximum intensities and ETSPL values are employed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ETSPL; Supra-aural headphone; attenuation; calibration; frequency response; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27610920     DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1214756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  Software Application toward Accessible Hearing Care Assessment: Gap in Noise Test.

Authors:  Khalid Alhussaini; Shaza Saleh; Adham Aleid; Saad Alkhalaf; Reem Badghaish; Amir Altinawi; Abdullatif Alwasel
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.822

Review 2.  Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review.

Authors:  Tess Bright; Danuk Pallawela
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2016-12-23

3.  Field-testing of a rapid survey method to assess the prevalence and causes of hearing loss in Gao'an, Jiangxi province, China.

Authors:  Tess Bright; Xin Shan; Jinling Xu; Jianguo Liang; Baixiang Xiao; Robbert Ensink; Islay Mactaggart; Sarah Polack; Jennifer L Y Yip
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-03-06

4.  Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.

Authors:  Zhenyu Guo; Guangzheng Yu; Huali Zhou; Xianren Wang; Yigang Lu; Qinglin Meng
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Headphone Evaluation for App-Based Automated Mobile Hearing Screening.

Authors:  Adam W Pickens; Lakshmi Dakuri Robertson; Matthew Lee Smith; Qi Zheng; Sejun Song
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.