Literature DB >> 27610120

Systematic Review and Pooled Analyses of Recent Neurointerventional Randomized Controlled Trials: Setting a New Standard of Care for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment after 20 Years.

Mohammed Hussain1, Mohammad Moussavi1, Daniel Korya1, Siddhart Mehta1, Jaskiran Brar1, Harina Chahal1, Ihtesham Qureshi1, Tapan Mehta2, Javaad Ahmad1, Osama O Zaidat3, Jawad F Kirmani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in the treatment of ischemic stroke have focused on revascularization and led to better clinical and functional outcomes. A systematic review and pooled analyses of 6 recent multicentered prospective randomized controlled trials (MPRCT) were performed to compare intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and endovascular therapy (intervention) with IV tPA alone (control) for anterior circulation ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO).
OBJECTIVES: Six MPRCTs (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, EXTEND IA, SWIFT PRIME, REVASCAT and THERAPY) incorporating image-based LVO AIS were selected for assessing the following: (1) prespecified primary clinical outcomes of AIS patients in intervention and control arms: good outcomes were defined by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days; (2) secondary clinical outcomes were: (a) revascularization rates [favorable outcomes defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (mTICI) score of 2b/3]; (b) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates and mortality; (c) derivation of number needed to harm (NNH), number needed to treat (NNT), and relative percent difference (RPD) between intervention and control groups, and (d) random effects model to determine overall significance (forest and funnel plots).
RESULTS: A total of 1,386 patients were included. Good outcomes at 90 days were seen in 46% of patients in the intervention (p < 0.00001) and in 27% of patients in the control groups (p < 0.00002). An mTICI score of 2b/3 was achieved in 70.2% of patients in the intervention arm. The sICH and mortality in the intervention arm compared with the control arm were 4.7 and 14.3% versus 7.9 and 17.8%, respectively. The NNT and NNH in the intervention and control groups were 5.3 and 9.1, respectively. Patients in the intervention arm had a 50.1% (RPD) better chance of achieving a good 90-day outcome as compared to controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy combined with IV tPA (in appropriately selected patients) for LVO-related AIS is superior to IV tPA alone. These results support establishing an endovascular therapy in addition to IV tPA as the standard of care for AIS secondary to LVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embolectomy; Endovascular therapy; Intra-arterial intervention; Ischemic stroke; Neurointervention; Pooled analysis; Randomized controlled trials

Year:  2016        PMID: 27610120      PMCID: PMC4934481          DOI: 10.1159/000442355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neurol        ISSN: 1664-5545


  31 in total

1.  Efficacy of intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute ischemic stroke: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Meng Lee; Keun-Sik Hong; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review.

Authors:  W D Weaver; R J Simes; A Betriu; C L Grines; F Zijlstra; E Garcia; L Grinfeld; R J Gibbons; E E Ribeiro; M A DeWood; F Ribichini
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection.

Authors:  Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Temporal trends in patient characteristics and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis among acute ischemic stroke patients at Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals.

Authors:  Lee H Schwamm; Syed F Ali; Mathew J Reeves; Eric E Smith; Jeffrey L Saver; Steven Messe; Deepak L Bhatt; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  The cortical ischemic core and not the consistently present penumbra is a determinant of clinical outcome in acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Authors:  Tudor G Jovin; Howard Yonas; James M Gebel; Emanuel Kanal; Yue Fang Chang; Stephen Z Grahovac; Steven Goldstein; Lawrence R Wechsler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

Authors:  C L Grines; K F Browne; J Marco; D Rothbaum; G W Stone; J O'Keefe; P Overlie; B Donohue; N Chelliah; G C Timmis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Gadolinium to the rescue for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Shailesh Male; Tapan Mehta; Huseyin Tore; Coridon Quinn; Andrew W Grande; Ramachandra P Tummala; Bharathi D Jagadeesan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Anesthetic Neuroprotection? It's Complicated.

Authors:  David S Warner; Huaxin Sheng
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Stroke in Pregnancy: A Focused Update.

Authors:  Eliza C Miller; Lisa Leffert
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke under conscious sedation: Predictors of poor outcomes.

Authors:  Umeshkumar Athiraman; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Akash Kansagra; Rene Tempelhoff
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-12

5.  Impact of EMS bypass to endovascular capable hospitals: geospatial modeling analysis of the US STRATIS registry.

Authors:  Nils Mueller-Kronast; Michael T Froehler; Reza Jahan; Osama Zaidat; David Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Systemic Glycemic Variation Predicts Mortality of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Prospective Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Jiangshan Deng; Ling Li; Fengya Cao; Feng Wang; Hongmei Wang; Hong Shi; Li Shen; Fei Zhao; Yuwu Zhao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.