| Literature DB >> 27610102 |
Huibin Qin1, Qinghui Sun2, Xuewei Pan2, Zhijun Qiao3, Hongjiang Yang2.
Abstract
Suanzhou as a traditional Chinese gruel is fermented from proso millet and millet. The biochemical analysis showed Suanzhou had relatively high concentrations of lactic acid, acetic acid, and free amino acids. The metagenomics of Suanzhou were studied, with the analysis of the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene, the genera Lactobacillus and Acetobacter were found dominant with the average abundance of 58.2 and 24.4%, respectively; and with the analysis of the ITS1 region between 18S and 5.8S rRNA genes, 97.3% of the fungal community was found belonging to the genus Pichia and 2.7% belonging to five other genera. Moreover, the isolates recovered from 59 Suanzhou samples with various media were identified with the 16S rRNA or 18S rRNA gene analyses. Lactobacillus fermentum (26.9%), L. pentosus (19.4%), L. casei (17.9%), and L. brevis (16.4%) were the four dominant Lactobacillus species; Acetobacter lovaniensis (38.1%), A. syzygii (16.7%), A. okinawensis (16.7%), and A. indonesiensis (11.9%) were the four dominant Acetobacter species; and Pichia kudriavzevii (55.8%) and Galactomyces geotrichum (23.1%) were the two dominant fungal species. Additionally, L. pentosus p28-c and L. casei h28-c1 were selected for the fermentations mimicking the natural process. Collectively, our data demonstrate that Suanzhou is a nutritional food high in free amino acids and organic acids. Diverse Lactobacillus, Acetobacter, and yeast species are identified as the dominant microorganisms in Suanzhou. The isolated strains can be further characterized and used as starters for the industrial production of Suanzhou safely.Entities:
Keywords: Suanzhou; acetic acid bacteria; free amino acid; lactic acid bacteria; metagenomic analysis; yeast
Year: 2016 PMID: 27610102 PMCID: PMC4997791 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Abundance of the top 12 abundant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among the Suanzhou samples. OTUs with the abundance <0.10% were not included in this diagram. G: OTUs at the genus level. F: OTUs at the family level. O: OTUs at the order level. Others: all OTUs with the abundance ≥0.10% were included. In summary, h10 with 0.10% Streptophyta (order); h12 with 0.10% Psychrobacter and 0.10% Clostridium; h15 with 0.10% Psychrobacter and 0.3% Streptophyta (order); h17 with 0.30% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae, 0.10% Phenylobacterium, and 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family); h21 with 0.20% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.10% Phenylobacterium, 0.10% Bacteroides, and 0.30% Bacteroidales (order); h22 with 0.10% Psychrobacter, and 2.60% Gluconacetobacter; h24 with 1.30% Psychrobacter, 0.20% Micrococcaceae (family); 0.5% Phenylobacterium, 0.40% Methylobacteriaceae (family), 0.10% Bacteroides, 0.10% Bacteroidales (order), 0.10% Brochothrix, 0.10% Caulobacteraceae (family), 0.10% Balneimonas, 0.90% Methylobacterium, 0.10% Halomonas, 0.30% Acinetobacter, 0.10% Enhydrobacter, and 0.10% Stenotrophomonas; h25 with 0.40% Psychrobacter, 0.30% Streptophyta (order), 0.20% Phenylobacterium, 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family); 0.10% Bacteroides, 0.20% Myroides, 0.20% Sphingobacterium, 0.10% Bacteroidales (order), 0.10% Brochothrix, 0.20% Staphylococcus, 0.10% Gemellales (order), 0.10% Kuenenia, 0.20% Enterobacteriaceae (family), 0.10% Klebsiella, 0.20% Acinetobacter, 0.10% Xanthomonadaceae (family); h26 with 0.10% Streptophyta (order); h29 with 0.10% Psychrobacter, and 0.50% Pediococcus; p1 with 0.40% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.40% Streptophyta (order), 0.10% Phenylobacterium, and 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family); p2 with 0.10% Comamonas, 0.20% Enterobacteriaceae (family), 0.10% Klebsiella, 0.10% Moraxellaceae (family), 0.10% Acinetobacter, and 0.10% Xanthomonadaceae (family); p3 with 0.20% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Streptophyta, 0.10% Phenylobacterium, 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family), 0.60% Bacteroides, 0.20% Bacteroidales (order), 0.30% Bacteroidia (class), 0.30% Barnesiellaceae (family), 0.10% Veillonellaceae (family), 0.10% Desulfovibri, and 0.10% Akkermansia; p4 with 0.20% Streptophyta (order); p6 with 0.20% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.10% Streptophyta (order), 0.10% Phenylobacterium, 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family), and 0.10% Bifidobacteriaceae (family); p9 with 0.20% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Phenylobacterium, and 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family); p10 with 0.20% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.10% Phenylobacterium, 0.10% Actinomyces, 1.10% Chryseobacterium, 0.20% Klebsiella, and 0.30% Acinetobacter; p12 with 0.20% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.10% Streptophyta (order), 0.10% Phenylobacterium, 0.20% Methylobacteriaceae (family), 0.10% Bacteroidales (order); p16 with 0.80% Psychrobacter, 0.30% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.30% Streptophyta (order), 0.30% Phenylobacterium, 0.30% Methylobacteriaceae (family), 0.10% Nocardioidaceae (family), 0.10% Myroides, 0.10% Brochothrix, 0.10% Paenibacillus; p18 with 0.30% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Micrococcaceae (family), 0.10% Phenylobacterium, 0.10% Methylobacteriaceae (family), 0.10% Halomonas; and p20 with 0.10% Psychrobacter, 0.10% Streptophyta (order), 0.40% Halomonas, and 0.20% Thermus.
Figure 2Abundance of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) on the basis of IST1 region analysis. All OTUs were at the genus level. The sequences with no blast hits (29.43% of the total clean reads) weren't included in this pie-chart.
Figure 3Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in the Suanzhou samples.
Figure 4The cladogram tree of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The partial 16S rRNA gene sequences (921–925 bp) were analyzed using the Neighbor-Joining method. L, Lactobacillus.
Phylogenetic affiliations of the isolates.
| h27 | |||
| p2 | |||
| p18 | |||
| p21 | |||
| h13 | |||
| p15 | |||
| h4 | |||
| h8 | |||
| h24 | |||
| p9 | |||
| p16 | |||
| p28 | |||
| h12 | |||
| h10 | |||
| p24 | |||
| p23 | |||
| h14 | |||
| h2 | |||
| p10 | |||
| p6 | |||
| p27 | |||
| p1 | |||
| p17 | |||
| p4 | |||
| p14 | |||
| p11 | |||
| h11 | |||
| h23 | |||
| h26 | |||
| h30 | |||
| p30 | |||
| p3 | |||
| p19 | |||
| p29 | |||
| p8 | |||
| h9 | |||
| h17 | |||
| h15 | |||
| h28 | |||
| h6 | |||
| h19 | |||
| h25 | |||
| h7 | |||
| h16 | |||
| h3 | |||
| p26 | |||
| h5 | |||
| h29 | |||
| h21 | |||
| p13 | |||
| p20 | |||
| h20 | |||
| h1 | |||
| h22 | |||
| p22 | |||
| p5 | |||
| p7 | |||
| h18 | |||
| p12 |
All isolates display 98–100% identity to the closest sequences. The isolates were arranged according to alphabetical order of LAB species names. L, Lactobacillus; A, Acetobacter; G, Galactomyces; P, Pichia; S, Saccharomyces; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; AAB, acetic acid bacteria. Gluconobacter oxydans was isolated in the sample h18. Pseudomonas psychrophila and Sphingobacterium mizutaii were isolated in the sample h28. Microbacterium schleiferi was isolated in the sample p14.
Figure 5Enumeration of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) in the Suanzhou samples.
Figure 6The cladogram tree of the acetic acid bacteria (AAB). The partial 16S rRNA gene sequences (1005–1026 bp) were analyzed using the Neighbor-Joining method. A, Acetobacter.
Figure 7Enumeration of yeasts in the Suanzhou samples.
Figure 8The cladogram tree of the yeasts. The partial 18S rRNA gene sequences (928–944 bp) were analyzed using the Neighbor-Joining method. P, Pichia. S, Saccharomyces. G, Galactomyces.
Figure 9Preparation of Suanzhou with in-lab fermentations. Strain L. casei h28-c1 and L. pentosus p28-c were used as starters. Bacterial cell density (lg cfu/ml), pH, lactic acid, total free amino acid, essential amino acid, and alanine content were evaluated, respectively.
Figure 10Venn diagram analysis of the logic relationships of the OTUs identified in the different samples. The left panel represented the OTUs from the samples fermented with different cereal grains, A: millet and a small amount of rice; B: millet; C: white proso millet; and D: red proso millet. The right panel represented the OTUs from the samples from two different counties: group A and B from Pianguan county, and group C and D from Hequ county.
Figure 11Implications of the antagonistic or synergistic interactions between the microbial populations. Green lines represented the antagonistic relationship between the two microbial populations. Red lines represented the synergistic relationship between the two microbial populations.