| Literature DB >> 27610030 |
Lidan Nong1, Jue Ma1, Guangyan Zhang1, Chunyu Deng2, Songsong Mao1, Haifeng Li1, Jianxiu Cui1.
Abstract
Despite the complex vascular effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX), its actions on human pulmonary resistance arteries remain unknown. The present study tested the hypothesis that DEX inhibits vascular tension in human pulmonary arteries through the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) mediated production of nitric oxide (NO). Pulmonary artery segments were obtained from 62 patients who underwent lung resection. The direct effects of DEX on human pulmonary artery tension and changes in vascular tension were determined by isometric force measurements recorded on a myograph. Arterial contractions caused by increasing concentrations of serotonin with DEX in the presence or absence of L-NAME (endothelial nitric oxide synthase inhibitor), yohimbine (α2-adrenoceptor antagonist) and indomethacin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor) as antagonists were also measured. DEX had no effect on endothelium-intact pulmonary arteries, whereas at concentrations of 10(-8)~10(-6) mol/L, it elicited contractions in endothelium-denuded pulmonary arteries. DEX (0.3, 1, or 3×10(-9) mmol/L) inhibited serotonin-induced contraction in arteries with intact endothelium in a dose-dependent manner. L-NAME and yohimbine abolished DEX-induced inhibition, whereas indomethacin had no effect. No inhibitory effect was observed in endothelium-denuded pulmonary arteries. DEX-induced inhibition of vasoconstriction in human pulmonary arteries is mediated by NO production induced by the activation of endothelial α2-adrenoceptor and nitric oxide synthase.Entities:
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; Human pulmonary arteries; Nitric oxide; Serotonin; Vasoconstriction
Year: 2016 PMID: 27610030 PMCID: PMC5014990 DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.2016.20.5.441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Physiol Pharmacol ISSN: 1226-4512 Impact factor: 2.016
Fig. 1DEX concerntration-dependently induced contraction in endothelium-denuded arteries.
*p<0.05 vs. control.
pD2 and Emax (%) of dexmedetomidine-induced inhibition on contractions
Significant difference between control and treatment groups is indicated by *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. control, #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 vs. DEX.
Fig. 2Serotonin induced contraction in the absence and presence of DEX.
DEX (0.3~3 nmol.L–1) concerntration-dependently attenuated serotonin-induced contractions. *p<0.05 vs. control.
Fig. 3Inhibitory effect of DEX (3×10–9 mol/L) on serotonin–induced contractions was abolished in the endothelium-denuded arteries.
No significant difference was observed between control and DEX pretreated artery rings in endothelium denuded group. *p<0.05 vs. control in endothelium intact group. #p<0.05 vs. Dex with endothelium.
Fig. 4Inhibitory effect of DEX (3×10–9 mol/L) on serotonin–induced contractions was abolished in the presence of L-NAME (10–4 mol/L).
The comparison was made in pulmonary artery rings with intact endothelium in the absence and presence of L-NAME. *p<0.05 vs. control. #p<0.05 vs. DEX without L-NAME.
Fig. 5Inhibitory effect of DEX (3×10–9 mol/L) to serotonin–induced contractions was abolished in the presence of Yohimbine (5×10–8 mol/L).
*p<0.05 vs. control. #p<0.05 vs. Dex without Yohimbine.
Fig. 6Inhibitory effect of dexmedetomidine (3×10–9 mol/L) to serotonin–induced contractions was not affected in the presence of indomethacin (5×10–6 mol/L).
*p<0.05 vs. control. #p<0.05 vs. Dex with indomathcin.