| Literature DB >> 27609687 |
Pil Hyung Lee1, Jung-Min Ahn1, Mineok Chang1, Seunghee Baek2, Sung-Han Yoon1, Soo-Jin Kang1, Seung-Whan Lee1, Young-Hak Kim1, Cheol Whan Lee1, Seong-Wook Park1, Duk-Woo Park3, Seung-Jung Park1.
Abstract
Left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is the highest-risk lesion subset of ischemic heart disease, and has traditionally been an indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Recent evidence suggests comparable clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG for LMCA disease, with similar rates of mortality and serious composite outcomes, a higher rate of stroke with CABG, and a higher rate of repeat revascularization with PCI. These results have been translated to the current guideline recommendation that PCI is a reasonable alternative to CABG in patients with low to intermediate anatomic complexity. However, how the characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected LMCA disease have evolved over time has not yet been fully evaluated. We therefore described secular trends in the characteristics and long-term outcomes of unprotected LMCA disease using "real-world" clinical experience from the IRIS-MAIN (Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization) registry together with a broad review of this topic.Entities:
Keywords: clinical decision making; coronary artery bypass; coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization; stents
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27609687 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094