Literature DB >> 27609183

Continuation and maintenance treatments for depression in older people.

Philip Wilkinson1, Zehanah Izmeth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depressive illness is common in old age. Prevalence in the community of case level depression is around 15% and milder forms of depression are more common. It causes significant distress and disability. The number of people over the age of 60 years is expected to double by 2050 and so interventions for this often long-term and recurrent condition are increasingly important. The causes of late-life depression differ from depression in younger adults and so it is appropriate to study it separately.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2012.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in preventing the relapse and recurrence of depression in older people. SEARCH
METHODS: We performed a search of the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group's specialised register (the CCMDCTR) to 13 July 2015. The CCMDCTR includes relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the following bibliographic databases: The Cochrane Library (all years), MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), and PsycINFO (1967 to date). We also conducted a cited reference search on 13 July 2015 of the Web of Science for citations of primary reports of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Both review authors independently selected studies. We included RCTs involving people aged 60 years and over successfully treated for an episode of depression and randomised to receive continuation and maintenance treatment with antidepressants, psychological therapies, or a combination. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. The primary outcome for benefit was recurrence rate of depression (reaching a cut-off on any depression rating scale) at 12 months and the primary outcome for harm was drop-outs at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included relapse/recurrence rates at other time points, global impression of change, social functioning, and deaths. We performed meta-analysis using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
RESULTS: This update identified no further trials. Seven studies from the previous review met the inclusion criteria (803 participants). Six compared antidepressant medication with placebo; two involved psychological therapies. There was marked heterogeneity between the studies.Comparing antidepressants with placebo on the primary outcome for benefit, there was a statistically significant difference favouring antidepressants in reducing recurrence compared with placebo at 12 months with a GRADE rating of low for quality of evidence (three RCTs, n = 247, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.82; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 5). Comparing antidepressants with placebo on the primary outcome for harms, there was no difference in drop-out rates at 12 months' follow-up, with a GRADE rating of low.There was no significant difference between psychological treatment and antidepressant in recurrence rates at 12 months (one RCT, n = 53) or between combination treatment and antidepressant alone at 12 months. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: This updated Cochrane review supports the findings of the original 2012 review. The long-term benefits and harm of continuing antidepressant medication in the prevention of recurrence of depression in older people are not clear and no firm treatment recommendations can be made on the basis of this review. Continuing antidepressant medication for 12 months appears to be helpful with no increased harms; however, this was based on only three small studies, relatively few participants, use of a range of antidepressant classes, and clinically heterogeneous populations. Comparisons at other time points did not reach statistical significance.Data on psychological therapies and combined treatments were too limited to draw any conclusions on benefits and harms.The quality of the evidence used in reaching these conclusions was low and the review does not, therefore, offer clear guidance to clinicians and patients on best practice and matching interventions to particular patient characteristics.Of note, we identified no new studies that evaluated pharmacological or psychological interventions in the continuation and maintenance treatment of depression in older people. We are aware of studies conducted since the previous review that included both older people and adults under the age of 65 years, but these fall outside of the remit of this review. We believe that there remains a need for studies solely recruiting older people, particularly the 'older old' with comorbid medical problems. However, these studies are likely to be challenging to conduct and may not, so far, have been prioritised by funders.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27609183      PMCID: PMC6457610          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006727.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  17 in total

Review 1.  Helpful approaches to older people experiencing mental health problems: a critical review of models of mental health care.

Authors:  Páll Biering
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2018-11-03

2.  Comparative effectiveness of continuation and maintenance treatments for persistent depressive disorder in adults.

Authors:  Katja Machmutow; Ramona Meister; Alessa Jansen; Levente Kriston; Birgit Watzke; Martin Christian Härter; Sarah Liebherz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Chance of response to an antidepressant: what should we say to the patient?

Authors:  Tilman Steinert
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 4.  Antidepressant pharmacotherapy in old-age depression-a review and clinical approach.

Authors:  Nathalie Pruckner; Vjera Holthoff-Detto
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  [Psychotherapy of depressive disorders : Procedures, evidence and perspectives].

Authors:  R Meister; A Jansen; M Berger; H Baumeister; T Bschor; T Harfst; M Hautzinger; L Kriston; C Kühner; H Schauenburg; S G Schorr; F Schneider; M Härter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults.

Authors:  Ellen Van Leeuwen; Mieke L van Driel; Mark A Horowitz; Tony Kendrick; Maria Donald; An Im De Sutter; Lindsay Robertson; Thierry Christiaens
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  Stuck between Bench and Bedside: Why Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Is Not Accessible to Depressed Patients in Europe.

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Soili M Lehto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Nurse-led medicines' monitoring in care homes study protocol: a process evaluation of the impact and sustainability of the adverse drug reaction (ADRe) profile for mental health medicines.

Authors:  Sue Jordan; Timothy Banner; Marie Gabe-Walters; Jane M Mikhail; Jeff Round; Sherrill Snelgrove; Mel Storey; Douglas Wilson; David Hughes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The development and tailoring of a peer support program for patients with diabetes mellitus and depression in a primary health care setting in Central Uganda.

Authors:  Dickens Akena; Elialilia S Okello; Jane Simoni; Glenn Wagner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A collaborative care psychosocial intervention to improve late life depression in socioeconomically deprived areas of Guarulhos, Brazil: the PROACTIVE cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Marcia Scazufca; Carina Akemi Nakamura; Tim J Peters; Maiara Garcia Henrique; Antônio Seabra; Ehidee Gomez La Rotta; Renato M Franzin; Daniele Ferreira Martins; Pepijn Van de Ven; William Hollingworth; Ricardo Araya
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.