| Literature DB >> 27609091 |
Nivedita K Naresh1, Joshua T Butcher2,3, Robert J Lye2, Xiao Chen1, Brant E Isakson2,3, Li-Ming Gan4,5, Christopher M Kramer6,7, Brian H Annex1,2,6, Frederick H Epstein8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impaired myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) is prevalent in obesity and diabetes, even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), and is prognostic of adverse events. We sought to establish the time course of reduced MPR and to investigate associated vascular and tissue properties in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD), as they are an emerging model of human obesity, diabetes, and reduced MPR without obstructive CAD.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Mouse; Myocardial perfusion reserve; Obesity; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27609091 PMCID: PMC5016874 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0273-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1a Body weight measurements in mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) and low-fat diet (control) at the start of diet and 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control). b Fasting blood glucose measurements in control and HFD mice at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control). c Glucose tolerance curves in the control and HFD mice at 12 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs control at the same time-point). d The area under the curve (AUC) of the glucose tolerance test at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control)
Fig. 2a Example first-pass perfusion images obtained from a mouse at rest. These images show the arrival of contrast agent in the right ventricle (i), left ventricle (ii and iii) and the myocardium (iv). b Rest perfusion measurements in the control and HFD mice at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks post-diet. c Stress perfusion measurements in the control and HFD mice at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control). d Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) measurements in the control and HFD mice (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control)
Fig. 3a Example black-blood cine images in the control and HFD mice at end-diastole and end-systole at 18 weeks post-diet. b LV mass measurements in the control and HFD mice at 6–24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control, $p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 6 weeks, #p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 12 weeks, &p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 18 weeks). c LV end-diastolic wall thickness (LVEDWT) measurements in the control and HFD mice at 6–24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control, $p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 6 weeks, #p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 12 weeks). d LV end-systolic wall thickness (LVESWT) measurements in the control and HFD mice at 6–24 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. age-matched control, $p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 6 weeks, #p < 0.05 vs. HFD at 12 weeks)
CMR parameters of cardiac function
| Time (Weeks after start of diet) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 weeks | 12 weeks | 18 weeks | 24 weeks | |||||
| Control | HFD | Control | HFD | Control | HFD | Control | HFD | |
| LVEDV (μL) | 43 ± 7 | 42 ± 7 | 48 ± 9 | 47 ± 10 | 44 ± 7 | 40 ± 7 | 40 ± 6 | 43 ± 5 |
| LVESV (μL) | 17 ± 4 | 14 ± 4 | 17 ± 6 | 17 ± 6 | 16 ± 6 | 12 ± 5 | 13 ± 4 | 11 ± 5 |
| LVEF (%) | 61 ± 8 | 66 ± 8 | 64 ± 12 | 65 ± 8 | 64 ± 9 | 69 ± 12 | 67 ± 8 | 74 ± 11 |
| Heart Rate (bpm) | 530 ± 63 | 538 ± 88 | 478 ± 39 | 485 ± 69 | 450 ± 84 | 512 ± 62 | 507 ± 47 | 549 ± 59 |
| Change in Heart Rate under Stress (%) | 23 ± 16 | 28 ± 12 | 27 ± 5 | 16 ± 13 | 15 ± 19 | 21 ± 13 | 21 ± 28 | −2 ± 15* |
| Ecc | −0.14 ± 0.02 | −0.13 ± 0.02 | −0.13 ± 0.02 | −0.12 ± 0.01 | −0.12 ± 0.03 | −0.11 ± 0.02 | −0.12 ± 0.01 | −0.14 ± 0.02 |
| Ecc-subepi | −0.09 ± 0.01 | −0.09 ± 0.02 | −0.09 ± 0.01 | −0.08 ± 0.01 | −0.08 ± 0.02 | −0.07 ± 0.02 | −0.08 ± 0.01 | −0.09 ± 0.01 |
| Ecc-subendo | −0.19 ± 0.02 | −0.17 ± 0.03 | −0.18 ± 0.03 | −0.16 ± 0.02 | −0.17 ± 0.04 | −0.16 ± 0.03 | −0.17 ± 0.02 | −0.20 ± 0.03 |
| CURE | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.03 |
*p < 0.05 vs. Control at same time point
Fig. 4a Cumulative arteriolar dose-response curves to adenosine in control and HFD mice at 26 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs control at same concentration). b Cumulative dose-response curves to acetylcholine in control and HFD mice at 26 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. control at same concentration). c Passive tone in the control and HFD mice at 26 weeks post-diet (*p < 0.05 vs. control at same pressure)
Fig. 5a Representative CD31-stained sections of the heart from a control and (b) a HFD mouse. c Capillary density in control and HFD mice. d Representative Masson’s Trichrome stained sections of the heart from a control and (e) a HFD mouse. f Myocardial interstitial fibrosis in control and HFD mice (*p < 0.05 vs. control). g Representative Masson’s Trichrome-stained coronary vessels from sections of the heart from a control mouse and (h) a HFD mouse. i Perivascular fibrosis in control and HFD mice. Scale bars = 50 μm