Literature DB >> 27609084

The efficacy of Schwann cell transplantation on motor function recovery after spinal cord injuries in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mostafa Hosseini1, Mahmoud Yousefifard2, Masoud Baikpour3, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar4, Farinaz Nasirinezhad5, Somaye Younesian6, Saeed Safari7, Parisa Ghelichkhani8, Ali Moghadas Jafari9.   

Abstract

AIM: This article aimed to assess the efficacy of Schwann cell transplantation on motor function recovery in animal model of spinal cord injuries via meta-analysis.
METHODS: An extended search was carried out in the electronic databases of Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE (via OvidSP), CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Web of Science (BIOSIS), and ProQuest. Finally, 41 eligible studies conducted on 1046 animals including 517 control animals and 529 transplanted animals were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported.
RESULTS: The findings showed that treatment with Schwann cells leads to a modest motor function recovery after spinal cord injury (SMD=0.85; 95% CI: 0.63-1.07; p<0.001). Transplantation of these cells in acute phase of the injury (immediately after the injury) (OR=4.30; 95% CI: 1.53-12.05; p=0.007), application of mesenchymal/skin-derived precursors (OR=2.34; 95% CI: 1.28-4.29; p=0.008), and cells with human sources are associated with an increase in efficacy of Schwann cells (OR=10.96; 95% CI: 1.49-80.77; p=0.02). Finally, it seems that the efficacy of Schwann cells in mice is significantly lower than rats (OR=0.03; 95% CI: 0.003-0.41; p=0.009).
CONCLUSION: Transplantation of Schwann cells can moderately improve motor function recovery. It seems that inter-species differences might exist regarding the efficacy of this cells. Therefore, this should be taken into account when using Schwann cells in clinical trials regarding spinal cord injuries. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Motor function recovery; Regeneration; Schwann cells; Spinal cord injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27609084     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat        ISSN: 0891-0618            Impact factor:   3.052


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Trials in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Jayne Donovan; Steven Kirshblum
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Combined application of neural stem/progenitor cells and scaffolds on locomotion recovery following spinal cord injury in rodents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Yousefifard; Shaghayegh Askarian-Amiri; Solmaz Nasseri Maleki; Seyedeh Niloufar Rafiei Alavi; Arian Madani Neishaboori; Leila Haghani; Alexander R Vaccaro; James S Harrop; Yi Lu; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Prevalence of anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arash Sarveazad; Mansour Bahardoust; Jebreil Shamseddin; Mahmoud Yousefifard
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Accuracy of cystatin C in prediction of acute kidney injury in children; serum or urine levels: which one works better? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Neamatollah Ataei; Masoud Baikpour; Fatemeh Ataei; Behnaz Bazargani; Arash Abbasi; Parisa Ghelichkhani; Faezeh Javidilarijani; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Schwann Cell Transplantation Subdues the Pro-Inflammatory Innate Immune Cell Response after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Damien D Pearse; Johana Bastidas; Sarah S Izabel; Mousumi Ghosh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Value of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes Decision Rule in the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ramezani; Sajjad Ahmadi; Gholamreza Faridaalee; Alireza Baratloo; Mahmoud Yousefifard
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2018-12-15

Review 7.  Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in Prediction of Computed Tomography Findings in Traumatic Brain Injury; a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ramezani; Amir Bahrami-Amiri; Asrin Babahajian; Kavous Shahsavari Nia; Mahmoud Yousefifard
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2018-12-15

Review 8.  Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of S-100β Is A Biomarker for Spinal Cord Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gholamreza Faridaalee; Fatemeh Keyghobadi Khajeh
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 9.  Polymeric Fibers as Scaffolds for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yuanpei Cheng; Yanbo Zhang; Han Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-09

10.  Meta-analysis of neuron specific enolase in predicting pediatric brain injury outcomes.

Authors:  Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Alireza Oraii; Arash Sarveazad; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.068

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.