| Literature DB >> 27608976 |
Xiaoyun Liu1, Xiaojie Sun2, Yang Zhao3, Qingyue Meng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) in rural China has been expanding in both population coverage and benefit package. China has also established an essential medicine policy in recent years to further reduce patients' medical expenditures and financial burden. This study aims to evaluate the impact of these policies on reducing medical expenditures and financial burden of patients diagnosed with hypertension and diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: China; Financial protection; Medical expenditure; New Cooperative Medical Scheme; Non-communicable chronic disease
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27608976 PMCID: PMC5017002 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1735-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
General information about the NCMS development in the three counties
| Pingyin | Liangshan | Junan | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| NCMS Enrollment (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| NCMS premium (Yuan) | 250 | 250 | 250 | 300 | 150 | 300 |
| Official copayment rate for outpatient service | 70 % | 70 % | 70 % (with a ceiling of 100 Yuan) | 70 % (with a ceiling of 100 Yuan) | 70 % (with a ceiling of 120 Yuan) | 70 % (with a ceiling of 170 Yuan) |
| Official copayment rate for inpatient service at township health center | 30 % | 15 % | 35 % | 30 % | 35 % | 15 % |
General information on hypertensive and diabetic patients in three rural counties in Shandong Province
| Hypertension | Diabetes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Sample size ( | 432 | 414 | 388 | 401 |
| Age (mean, SD) | 64.7 (10.1) | 64.3 (10.4) | 61.2 (9.4) | 62.3 (9.9) |
| Sex (% of male) | 36.6 | 34.1 | 24.5 | 26.9 |
| Marriage (% of married) | 80.1 | 82.9 | 86.3 | 82.0 |
| Education (%) | ||||
| Illiterate | 64.8 | 65.2 | 63.7 | 65.8 |
| Primary school | 19.7 | 18.1 | 18.6 | 20.7 |
| High school | 15.5 | 16.7 | 17.5 | 13.2 |
| College and above | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Annual household expenditure Yuan (Median, P25 P75) | 7000 (4000–10950) | 7200 (3500–12000) | 9000 (5500–14550) | 8800 (5100–13600) |
| NCMS coverage (%) | 96.5 | 98.1 | 97.4 | 97.5 |
P > 0.05 for all comparisons between 2011 and 2012
Outpatient service utilization and expenditure for hypertensive and diabetic patients in 2011 and 2012
| Hypertension | Diabetes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| No. of OP visits in the last month (Mean) | 1.8 | 2.2** | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| Monthly outpatient expenditure (Yuan) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 56.6 (226.8) | 140.6 (481.8)** | 123.5 (147.8) | 252.9 (618.7)** |
| Median (P25 P75) | 20 (10–50) | 40 (15–110)** | 73.5 (30–157.5) | 100 (30–260)* |
| % of copayment | 83.2 | 70.2** | 85.7 % | 78.2 %** |
| CHE incidence (%) | 11.8 | 23.0** | 22.1 | 37.5** |
*: 0.01 < P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01
Regression analysis of monthly outpatient expenditure for hypertensive and diabetic patients in 2011 and 2012
| Hypertension | Diabetes | |
|---|---|---|
| β (95 % CI) | β (95 % CI) | |
| Constant | 111.1 (−138.9, 361.1) | 12.4 (−307.8, 332.6) |
| Sex | ||
| Male (Reference) | 0 | 0 |
| Female | −1.4 (−60.0, 57.2) | 40.2 (−37.9, 118.3) |
| Age | −1.0 (−3.6, 1.7) | −0.9 (−4.3, 2.6) |
| Education level | ||
| Non-illiterate (Reference) | 0 | 0 |
| Illiterate | 55.0 (−7.4, 117.5) | 58.8 (−17.6, 135.2) |
| No. of outpatient visits | 24.1 (10.9, 37.3)** | 64.3 (44.9, 83.8)** |
| NCMS premium | −0.3 (−1.0, 0.3) | −0.2 (−1.0, 0.6) |
| Year | ||
| 2011 (Reference) | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 98.5 (25.6, 171.3)** | 135.1 (44.0, 226.2)** |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.026** | 0.071** |
*: 0.01 < P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01
Inpatient expenditures and NCMS reimbursement for hypertensive and diabetic patients in 2011 and 2012
| Hypertension | Diabetes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| % of patients using inpatient services | 16.0 | 16.7 | 19.3 | 21.7 |
| Inpatient expenditures | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 4516.6 (4771.5) | 6734.2 (10734.8) | 5023.5 (4559.1) | 4549.3 (3386.0) |
| Median (P25 P75) | 4000 (1680–6000) | 4000 (2000–6734) | 4000 (2000–6000) | 4000 (3000–6000) |
| % of copayment for inpatient services | 62.8 | 57.8 | 66.0 | 50.4** |
| CHE incidence (%) | 42.0 | 43.5 | 36.0 | 32.2 |
*: 0.01 < P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01
Regression analysis of annual inpatient expenditures for hypertensive and diabetic patients in 2011 and 2012
| Hypertension | Diabetes | |
|---|---|---|
| β (95 % CI) | β (95 % CI) | |
| Constant | 8508.9 (−5438.1, 22455.8) | 5043.1 (−1708.6, 11794.9) |
| Sex | ||
| Male (Reference) | 0 | 0 |
| Female | −3396.7 (−6779.5, −13.8)* | 216.3 (−1299.4, 1732.0) |
| Age | −47.4 (−197.1, 102.3) | −10.8 (−79.2, 57.7) |
| Education level | ||
| Non-illiterate (Reference) | 0 | 0 |
| Illiterate | −1664.7 (−5359.6, 2030.2) | −1208.6 (−2633.1, 215.8) |
| NCMS premium | 27.0 (−11.1, 65.0) | 5.2 (−12.5, 22.9) |
| Year | ||
| 2011 (Reference) | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 245.1 (−3619.6, 4109.7) | −889.4 (−2739.2, 960.4) |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.057* | 0.006 |
*: 0.01 < P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01