Thomas A Rasmussen1, Jenny L Anderson, Fiona Wightman, Sharon R Lewin. 1. aThe Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia bDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark cDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides an overview of anticancer therapies in various stages of clinical development as potential interventions to target HIV persistence. RECENT FINDINGS: Epigenetic drugs developed for cancer have been investigated in vitro, ex vivo and in clinical trials as interventions aimed at reversing HIV latency and depleting the amount of virus that persists on antiretroviral therapy. Treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors induced HIV expression in patients on antiretroviral therapy but did not reduce the frequency of infected cells. Other interventions that may accelerate the decay of latently infected cells, in the presence or absence of latency-reversing therapy, are now being explored. These include apoptosis-promoting agents, nonhistone deacetylase inhibitor compounds to reverse HIV latency and immunotherapy interventions to enhance antiviral immunity such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and Toll-like receptor agonists. SUMMARY: A curative strategy in HIV will likely need to both reduce the amount of virus that persists on antiretroviral therapy and improve anti-HIV immune surveillance. Although we continue to explore advances in the field of oncology including cancer immunotherapy, there are major differences in the risk-benefit assessment between HIV-infected individuals and patients with malignancies. Drug development specifically targeting HIV persistence will be the key to developing effective interventions with an appropriate safety profile.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides an overview of anticancer therapies in various stages of clinical development as potential interventions to target HIV persistence. RECENT FINDINGS: Epigenetic drugs developed for cancer have been investigated in vitro, ex vivo and in clinical trials as interventions aimed at reversing HIV latency and depleting the amount of virus that persists on antiretroviral therapy. Treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors induced HIV expression in patients on antiretroviral therapy but did not reduce the frequency of infected cells. Other interventions that may accelerate the decay of latently infected cells, in the presence or absence of latency-reversing therapy, are now being explored. These include apoptosis-promoting agents, nonhistone deacetylase inhibitor compounds to reverse HIV latency and immunotherapy interventions to enhance antiviral immunity such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and Toll-like receptor agonists. SUMMARY: A curative strategy in HIV will likely need to both reduce the amount of virus that persists on antiretroviral therapy and improve anti-HIV immune surveillance. Although we continue to explore advances in the field of oncology including cancer immunotherapy, there are major differences in the risk-benefit assessment between HIV-infected individuals and patients with malignancies. Drug development specifically targeting HIV persistence will be the key to developing effective interventions with an appropriate safety profile.
Authors: T W Chun; L Stuyver; S B Mizell; L A Ehler; J A Mican; M Baseler; A L Lloyd; M A Nowak; A S Fauci Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Tingting Tan; Yu-Ning Wong; Margaret M von Mehren; Lois Malizzia; Susan K Roethke; Samuel Litwin; Tianyu Li; Gary R Hudes; Naomi B Haas Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-03-27
Authors: Daniela Boehm; Vincenzo Calvanese; Roy D Dar; Sifei Xing; Sebastian Schroeder; Laura Martins; Katherine Aull; Pao-Chen Li; Vicente Planelles; James E Bradner; Ming-Ming Zhou; Robert F Siliciano; Leor Weinberger; Eric Verdin; Melanie Ott Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Andrew W Roberts; Matthew S Davids; John M Pagel; Brad S Kahl; Soham D Puvvada; John F Gerecitano; Thomas J Kipps; Mary Ann Anderson; Jennifer R Brown; Lori Gressick; Shekman Wong; Martin Dunbar; Ming Zhu; Monali B Desai; Elisa Cerri; Sari Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; William G Wierda; John F Seymour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nicolas Chomont; Mohamed El-Far; Petronela Ancuta; Lydie Trautmann; Francesco A Procopio; Bader Yassine-Diab; Geneviève Boucher; Mohamed-Rachid Boulassel; Georges Ghattas; Jason M Brenchley; Timothy W Schacker; Brenna J Hill; Daniel C Douek; Jean-Pierre Routy; Elias K Haddad; Rafick-Pierre Sékaly Journal: Nat Med Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Guoxin Wu; Michael Swanson; Aarthi Talla; Donald Graham; Julie Strizki; Daniel Gorman; Richard Jo Barnard; Wade Blair; Ole S Søgaard; Martin Tolstrup; Lars Østergaard; Thomas A Rasmussen; Rafick-Pierre Sekaly; Nancie M Archin; David M Margolis; Daria J Hazuda; Bonnie J Howell Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-08-17
Authors: Kasha P Singh; Megan Crane; Jennifer Audsley; Anchalee Avihingsanon; Joe Sasadeusz; Sharon R Lewin Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 4.177