Literature DB >> 27606042

Performance characteristics of retrograde single-balloon endoscopy: A single center experience.

Kaci E Christian1, Karan Kapoor1, Eric M Goldberg1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the technical success, diagnostic yield (DY) and therapeutic potential of retrograde single balloon enteroscopy (rSBE).
METHODS: A retrospective review of 136 rSBE procedures performed at a tertiary academic referral center from January 2006 and September 2013 was completed. Patient characteristics including age, gender and inpatient status were collected. The indication for the procedure was categorized into one of three groups: Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), evaluation for Crohn's disease and abnormal imaging. Procedural characteristics including insertion depth (ID), procedure time, concordance with pre-procedural imaging and complications were also recorded. Lastly, DY, defined as the percentage of cases producing either a definitive diagnosis or findings that could explain clinical symptoms and therapeutic yield (TY), defined as the percentage of cases in which a definitive intervention was performed, were determined. Mucosal tattooing and biopsy alone were not included in the TY.
RESULTS: A total of 136 rSBE procedures were identified. Mean patient age was 57.5 (± 16.2) years, 67 (49.2%) were male, and 110 (80.9%) procedures were performed on an outpatient basis. Indications for rSBE included GIB in 55 (40.4%), evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in 29 (21.3%), and imaging suggestive of pathology other than GIB or IBD in 43 (31.6%). Nine (6.6%) rSBEs were performed for other indications. Mean ID was 68.3 (± 39.3) cm proximal to the ileocecal valve and mean time to completion was 41.7 (± 15.5) min. Overall, 73 (53.7%) cases were diagnostic and 25 (18.4%) cases were therapeutic in which interventions (argon plasma coagulation, stricture dilatation, polypectomy, etc.) were performed. Pre-procedural imaging was performed in 88 (64.7%) patients. Endoscopic concordance of positive imaging findings was seen in 31 (35.2%) cases. Follow up data was available in 93 (68.4%) patients; 2 (2.2%) reported post-procedural abdominal pain within 30 d following rSBE. There were no other reported complications.
CONCLUSION: rSBE exhibits an acceptable diagnostic and TY, rendering it a safe and effective procedure for the evaluation and treatment of small bowel diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; Enteroscopy; Retrograde; Single-balloon

Year:  2016        PMID: 27606042      PMCID: PMC4980639          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  27 in total

1.  Single-balloon versus double-balloon endoscopy for achieving total enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Noriyuki Takano; Atsuo Yamada; Hirotsugu Watabe; Goichi Togo; Yutaka Yamaji; Haruhiko Yoshida; Takao Kawabe; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Complications of single-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective evaluation of 166 procedures.

Authors:  H Aktas; L de Ridder; J Haringsma; E J Kuipers; P B Mensink
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Deep enteroscopy: training, indications, and the endoscopic technique.

Authors:  Jonathan M Buscaglia; Patrick I Okolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Simona Di Caro; Andrea May; Dimitri G N Heine; Lucia Fini; Bruno Landi; Lucio Petruzziello; Christophe Cellier; Chris J Mulder; Guido Costamagna; Christian Ell; Antonio Gasbarrini
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers.

Authors:  Shahab Mehdizadeh; Andrew Ross; Lauren Gerson; Jonathan Leighton; Ann Chen; Drew Schembre; Gary Chen; Carol Semrad; Ahmad Kamal; Edwyn M Harrison; Kenneth Binmoeller; Irving Waxman; Richard Kozarek; Simon K Lo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhuan Liao; Rui Gao; Can Xu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Learning curve, diagnostic yield and safety of single balloon enteroscopy.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Dutta; Kattiparambil Gangadharan Sajith; Anjilivelil J Joseph; Ebby George Simon; Ashok Chacko
Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

8.  Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope.

Authors:  Takuji Kawamura; Kenjiro Yasuda; Kiyohito Tanaka; Koji Uno; Moose Ueda; Kasumi Sanada; Masatsugu Nakajima
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth.

Authors:  Marios Efthymiou; Paul V Desmond; Gregor Brown; Richard La Nauze; Arthur Kaffes; Tee Joo Chua; Andrew C F Taylor
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Role of small-bowel endoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an international OMED-ECCO consensus.

Authors:  A Bourreille; A Ignjatovic; L Aabakken; E V Loftus; R Eliakim; M Pennazio; Y Bouhnik; E Seidman; M Keuchel; J G Albert; S Ardizzone; S Bar-Meir; R Bisschops; E J Despott; P F Fortun; R Heuschkel; J Kammermeier; J A Leighton; G J Mantzaris; D Moussata; S Lo; V Paulsen; J Panés; G Radford-Smith; W Reinisch; E Rondonotti; D S Sanders; J M Swoger; H Yamamoto; S Travis; J-F Colombel; A Van Gossum
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of retrograde through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy.

Authors:  Yi Jia; Majd Michael; Mohammad Bashashati; Sherif Elhanafi; Christopher Dodoo; Alok K Dwivedi; Andres F Carrion; Mohamed O Othman; Marc J Zuckerman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-11-16

Review 2.  Enteroscopy in children and adults with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Nardo; Gianluca Esposito; Chiara Ziparo; Federica Micheli; Luigi Masoni; Maria Pia Villa; Pasquale Parisi; Maria Beatrice Manca; Flavia Baccini; Vito Domenico Corleto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial.

Authors:  Naoki Hosoe; Kazuo Ohtsuka; Yutaka Endo; Makoto Naganuma; Noriyuki Ogata; Yuichiro Kuroki; Seiko Sasanuma; Kaoru Takabayashi; Shin-Ei Kudo; Hiroshi Takahashi; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-10-08

4.  Technical and Clinical Aspects of Diagnostic Single-Balloon Enteroscopy in the First Decade of Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ye Gao; Lei Xin; Yi-Tong Zhang; Xiao-Rong Guo; Qian-Qian Meng; Zhao-Shen Li; Zhuan Liao
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.