Literature DB >> 27605864

Disability, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life in infertile women: a cross-sectional study in Turkey.

Hacer Sezgin1, Cicek Hocaoglu2, Emine Seda Guvendag-Guven3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility is a major life crisis which can lead to the development of psychiatric symptoms and negative effects on the quality of life of affected couples, but the magnitude of the effects may vary depending on cultural expectations. AIM: We compare the level of psychiatric symptoms, disability, and quality of life in fertile and infertile women in urban Turkey.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 100 married women being treated for infertility at the outpatient department of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the Rize Education and Research Hospital and a control group of 100 fertile married women. All study participants were evaluated with a socio-demographic data screening form, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).
RESULTS: The mean anxiety subscale score and depression subscale score of HADS were slightly higher in the infertile group than in controls, but the differences were not statistically significant. The proportion of subjects with clinically significant anxiety (i.e., anxiety subscale score of HADS ≥11) was significantly higher in infertile women than in fertile women (31% v. 17%, χ (2)=5.37, p=0.020), but the proportion with clinically significant depressive symptoms (i.e., depression subscale score of HADS >8) was not significantly different (43% v. 33%, χ (2)=2.12, p=0.145). Self-reported disability over the prior month was significantly worse in the infertile group than in the controls, and 4 of the 8 subscales of the SF-36 - general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health - were significantly worse in the infertile group. Compared to infertile women who were currently working, infertile women who were not currently working reported less severe depression and anxiety and better general health, vitality, and mental health.
CONCLUSIONS: Married women from urban Turkey seeking treatment for infertility do not have significantly more severe depressive symptoms than fertile married controls, but they do report greater physical and psychological disability and a poorer quality of life. The negative effects of infertility were more severe in infertile women who were employed than in those who were not employed. Larger follow-up studies are needed to assess the reasons for the differences between these results and those reported in western countries which usually report a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in infertile patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turkey; cross-sectional study; disability; infertility; psychiatric symptoms; quality of life

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605864      PMCID: PMC5004092          DOI: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry        ISSN: 1002-0829


Introduction

Infertility, defined as the failure to become pregnant despite regular sexual intercourse for one year, affects 10-15% of couples in the reproductive age group (18- 45 years of age).[ It often results in substantial negative social and psychological effects for the affected couple, particularly the woman.[ There are many studies about the etiology and treatment of infertility[ but relatively few about the psychological and social effects of infertility. One study of 112 women being treated for infertility in Taiwan[ reported that 23% met diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder, 17% for major depressive disorder, and 10% for dysthymic disorder; thus over 40% had one of these common mental disorders, a much higher prevalence than the 10% to 12% reported in the general population. Nationally representative studies of community-dwelling women in the United States, [and in Finland[ reported that infertility was associated with high rates of anxiety symptoms. Social factors influence attitudes about infertility and the lived experience of persons who are infertile. Thus, it is reasonable to expect that the prevalence of mental disorders in individuals with infertility will vary cross-culturally. The aim of this study was to compare the severity of anxiety, depression, and diminished quality of life between married women from one urban center in Turkey seeking treatment for infertility with that of fertile married women from the same community who are matched for age.

Methods

Participants

As shown in Figure 1, this study enrolled married women treated in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Rize Training and Research Hospital who had a diagnosis of infertility between March and September 2011. Participants met the following criteria: (a) 18 to 50 years of age; (b) currently married; (c) residents of Rize; (d) able to read at a level that made it possible to complete the questionnaires used in the study; (e) not menopausal; (f) did not have mental retardation, dementia, a psychotic disorder, or a history of substance abuse; (g) had not used psychoactive medication in the prior 3 months; and (h) provided written informed consent to participate in the study. The control group were healthy fertile women who were currently married and residents of Rize; they were identified from among hospital workers and relatives of the enrolled patients, matched for age with the identified patients, and provided written informed consent to participate in the study.
Figure 1

Flowchart of the study

Measurements

All participants were administered a comprehensive demographic data form by the researcher, and self-completed three scales: the Turkish versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), [ the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), [ and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).[

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)[ is a 14-item scale (7 about anxiety and 7 about depression) scored on 4-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 3) that assesses the severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms in the prior week. The total score for each of the two subscales, respectively) ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing more severe depression or anxiety. Based on studies with the Turkish version of the scale, [ individuals with scores of 8 or above on the depression subscale have clinically significant depression and individuals with scores of 11 or more on the anxiety subscale have clinically significant anxiety.

The Brief Disability Questionnaire

The Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ) is composed of 11 items about physical and social deficits in the prior month that were originally part of the MOS Short Form General Health Survey.[ Items are scored on 3-point Likert scales (0 to 2), so the range in scores is from 0 to 22 with higher scores representing greater deficits: scores of 0 to 4 are classified as 'no deficit', 5 to 7 as 'mild deficit', 8 to 12 as 'moderate deficit', and 13 or higher as 'severe deficit'. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of BDQ have been assessed.[

The Short Form Health Survey

The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)[ is a self-completion scale developed by the Rand Corporation to assess quality of life. The 36 items are subdivided into 8 subscales that assess physical functioning, physical role performance, pain, general health, vitality (energy), social functioning, emotional role-performance, and mental health. The crude subscale scores are converted to 0-to-100 point scales with higher scores representing better health status. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale has been assessed previously.[

Statistical Analysis

Data were assessed using the SPSS v16.0 statistical package. Demographic variables and the outcomes of the three clinical self-report scales used in the study in the infertile and fertile groups were compared using Chi-square tests for dichotomous variables, Mann-Whitney U tests for ranked variables, and t-tests for continuous variables from normal populations. Within the infertile group, the relationship of the demographic characteristics of the individuals with the outcomes of the three scales were assessed using correlation coefficients (for continuous variables), Chi-square tests, and the Mann-Whitney U test. The conduct of this study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee in the Faculty of Medicine at Recep Tayyip Erdogan University.

Results

In total, 100 infertile women and 100 healthy volunteers completed the study. Table 1 compares the demographic characteristics of the two groups. There were no significant differences in the level of education or family income between the infertile and fertile women, in the proportion who were currently employed, or in the proportions who reported a personal or family history of psychiatric treatment. The range in age of individuals in the infertile group was 21 to 47 and that of individuals in the control group was 22 to 52. The mean (sd) age of individuals in the infertile group was 29.7 (5.6) years and that in the fertile control group was 30.7 (5.5) years (t=1.27, p=0.204). There was, however, a significant difference in the duration of marriage between groups: the infertile group had been married for an average of 9.3 (6.3) years while the healthy control group had only been married for an average of 6.4 (3.4) years (t=4.05, p<0.001). Among the 8 women in the infertile group with a history of psychiatric illness, 5 had had major depression, 2 panic disorder, and 1 somatization disorder; the 11 women in the healthy control group with a history of a psychiatric disorder included 6 who had had major depression, 3 with generalized anxiety disorder, 2 with adjustment disorder, and 1 with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Table 1

Comparison of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of infertile female patients and healthy, fertile controls

characteristic infertile patients (n=100) n(%) healthy controls (n=100) n(%) statistic (p-value)
Educational status
illiterate 1 (1%) 4 (4%)Za=0.48 (0.631)
primary school 38 (38%) 36 (36%)
middle school 16 (16%) 15 (15%)
high school 27 (27%) 32 (32%)
university 18 (18%) 13 (13%)
Family income (Turkish lira, TL)b
<1000 TL 30 (33.3%) 42 (42.4%)Za=1.77 (0.077)
1001-2000 TL 28 (31.1%) 35 (35.4%)
2001-3000 TL 21 (23.3%) 15 (15.2%)
≥3001 TL 11 (12.2%) 7 (7.1%)
Currently employed 74 (74%) 83 (83%) χ2=5.16 (0.473)
History of psychiatric illness 8 (8%) 15 (15%) χ2=2.13 (0.144)
Family history of psychiatric illness 12 (12%) 11 (11%) χ2=0.04 (0.835)

aZ-value for Mann-Whitney U test

bIn September 2011, 1.78 Turkish lira were equivalent to 1 $US; 10 patients in the infertile group and 1 in the control group did not provide income data

aZ-value for Mann-Whitney U test bIn September 2011, 1.78 Turkish lira were equivalent to 1 $US; 10 patients in the infertile group and 1 in the control group did not provide income data Comparison of the anxiety and depression subscale scores of the HADS, BDQ total scores, and SF-36 subscale scores between the two groups is shown in Table 2. The mean level of self-reported anxiety and depressive symptoms over the prior week was not significantly different between the two groups. However, the proportion of subjects who had clinically significant anxiety (i.e., HADS anxiety subscale score >11) was significantly higher in the infertile group than in the control group (31% v. 17%, χ2=5.37, p=0.020) and the proportion who had clinically significant depression (i.e., HADS depression subscale score >8) was also higher (but not significantly higher) in the infertile group than in the control group (43% v. 33%, χ2=2.12, p=0.145).
Table 2

Mean (sd) scores from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) of 100 infertile female patients and 100 fertile controls from Turkey

infertile patients fertile controls t-test p-value
HADS anxiety subscale8.2 (4.3) 7.3 (4.1) 1.51 0.131
HADS depression subscale6.6 (4.1) 6.3 (3.4) 0.56 0.574
BDQ9.1 (2.8) 5.4 (3.2) 8.70 <0.001
SF-36 subscales
physical functioning78.3 (19.9) 80.3 (15.6) 0.79 0.430
physical role performance58.5 (40.0) 49.7 (38.3) 1.59 0.114
pain63.9 (20.4) 60.2 (17.6) 1.37 0.171
general health47.4 (22.3) 60.5 (18.2) 4.55 <0.001
vitality (energy) 41.3 (22.9) 52.4 (17.8) 3.82 <0.001
social functioning56.5 (23.2) 67.8 (21.3) 3.59 <0.001
emotional role performance50.6 (38.3) 52.6 (39.6) 0.36 0.717
mental health55.2 (23.2) 61.4 (20.4) 2.01 0.046
The severity of self-reported disability was significantly greater among infertile patients than among the fertile controls. The proportion of respondents in the infertile group classified as 'no disability', 'mild' disability', 'moderate disability' and 'severe disability' were 5%, 15%, 63%, and 17%, respectively; the corresponding proportions in the fertile control group were 39%, 39%, 20% and 2%, respectively. (Z-value for the Mann-Whitney rank test=7.82, p<0.001). Comparison of the scores of the various measures assessed by the SF-36 show that 4 of the 8 subscales - general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health - were significantly worse in the infertile group. Table 3 shows the association between different demographic characteristics of the infertile patients and the severity of their depressive and anxiety symptoms, their self-reported level of disability, and their scores on the four SF-36 subscales in which the infertile patients were functioning at significantly lower levels than controls. There were several significant findings. AGE: somewhat unexpectedly, within this group of infertile women, self-reported disability decreased with age. EDUCATION: higher education was significantly associated with decreased self-reported depression and anxiety, and poorer self-reported social functioning. INCOME: higher family income was associated with less severe self-reported depression and anxiety, and better self-reported general health. DURATION OF MARRIAGE: infertile women married for less than 5 years reported significantly greater disability over the prior month than infertile women married for 5 years or more. CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: compared to employed infertile women, unemployed infertile women had less severe depressive and anxiety symptoms and reported better general health, vitality, and mental health. Neither a HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS nor a FAMILY HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS were significantly related to any of the outcome variables.
Table 3

Association of demographic variables and scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HAD-D, HAD-A), the Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and three subscale scores of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in 100 infertile female outpatients in Turkey

HADS depression subscale HADS anxiety subscale BDQ SF-36 general health subscale SF-36 vitality subscale SF-36 social function subscale SF-36 mental health subscale
age, Pearson r (p-value) 0.09 (0.343) 0.004 (0.969) -0.25 (0.013) 0.07 (0.465) 0.10 (0.307) 0.07 (0.744) 0.08 (0.387)
level of education, Spearman r (p-value) -0.24 (0.005) -0.27 (0.012) 0.15 (0.130) 0.10 (0.293) 0.08 (0.387) -0.96 (0.001) 0.07 (0.473)
monthly income, Spearman r (p-value) -0.22 (0.025) -0.21 (0.031) 0.07 (0.485) 0.20 (0.046) 0.12 (0.243) 0.09 (0.361) 0.14 (0.161)
YEARS OF MARRIAGE, mean (sd)
<5 years (n=58) 6.0 (4.2) 7.9 (4.3) 9.7 (2.8) 48.1 (22.7) 50.9 (23.7) 55.1 (25.1) 56.1 (24.3)
5+ years (n=42) 7.5 (3.9) 8.6 (4.3) 8.4 (2.7) 46.5 (22.0) 51.9 (21.9) 58.3 (20.5) 54.0 (21.9)
t-test (p-value) 1.72 (0.088) 0.82 (0.410) 2.22 (0.029) 0.36 (0.718) 0.20 (0.838) 0.66 (0.505) 0.43 (0.667)
EMPLOYMENT STATUS, mean (sd)
currently employed (n=74) 7.5 (4.0) 9.0 (4.1) 9.0 (2.6) 43.3 (20.7) 47.2 (22.0) 53.8 (22.0) 50.0 (22.8)
not currently employed (n=26) 4.1 (3.2) 5.8 (4.0) 9.6 (3.4) 59.3 (22.8) 63.0 (21.6) 63.9 (25.3) 70.1 (17.6)
t-test (p-value) 3.90 (<0.001) 3.47 (0.001) 1.03 (0. 304) 3.28 (0.001) 3.17 (0.002) 1.92 (0.058) 4.07 (<0.001)
HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS, mean (sd)
yes (n=8) 7.0 (5.8) 9.8 (5.3) 10.8 (2.8) 49.6 (24.4) 45.6 (27.1) 43.7 (21.1) 48.0 (30.3)
no (n=92) 6.6 (4.0) 8.0 (4.2) 9.0 (2.8) 47.2 (22.3) 51.8 (22.6) 57.6 (23.2) 55.9 (22.6)
t-test (p-value) 0.23 (0.816) 1.12 (0.263) 1.34 (0.181) 0.28 (0.779) 0.73 (0.464) 1.62 (0.106) 0.92 (0.359)
FAMILY HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS, mean (sd)
yes (n=12) 6.2 (3.7) 9.0 (4.6) 8.7 (2.8) 54.3 (22.1) 48.3 (19.9) 61.4 (22.2) 53.0 (19.0)
no (n=88) 6.7 (4.2) 8.1 (4.3) 9.2 (2.9) 46.5 (22.3) 51.7 (23.3) 55.8 (23.4) 55.5 (23.8)
t-test (p-value) 0.37 (0.710) 0.66 (0.509) 0.56 (0.575) 1.13 (0.260) 0.48 (0.629) 0.78 (0.434) 0.36 (0.720)

Discussion

Main findings

Both self-report depressive symptoms and self-report anxiety symptoms on the HADS were more severe in infertile women than in fertile women, but the difference was not statistically significant for depressive symptoms and only statistically significant for anxiety symptoms when results were dichotomized into those with and without 'clinically significant anxiety'. Infertile women reported greater disability on the BDQ and poorer functioning on 4 of the 8 components of quality of life assessed by the SF-36. We also found that compared to infertile women who were not employed, those that were employed reported more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety, greater disability, and poorer quality of life. In Turkey, infertile women who are not able to bear children are marginalized in the society and often harshly criticized by their husbands and inlaws. This environment would reasonably be expected to negatively affect the emotional status of infertile women, and, thus, lead to an increased prevalence of common mental disorders, such as depression or anxiety. Most international studies[ support this hypothesized causal link between a chronic psychosocial stressor and emotional dysregulation: they report a significantly higher severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms and a significantly higher prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among infertile women than among fertile women. There are, however, exceptions: similar to the results of the current study, two previous studies from Turkey[ reported no significant difference in the level of depression and anxiety between infertile and fertile women. Previous reports have also had different findings about the association of age and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms in infertile women; some studies confirm our finding of no relationship, [ while other studies[ report that depressive and anxiety symptoms increase with age. The reason for these differences are unknown, but the possible explanations include (a) high levels of depression and anxiety in all married Turkish women regardless of fertility status; (b) cross-cultural differences in the mechanism via which social stressors lead to emotional disturbances; and (c) methodological limitations of the study, Several studies have reported on the quality of life among infertile women.[ Similar to our findings, most of the case control studies report substantially decreased quality of life among infertile women in several of the quality of life subscales.[ However, unlike other studies, we did not find that decreased quality of life among infertile women was closely associated with increased symptoms of depression.[ Thus the quality of life changes in our infertile patients in Turkey were not directly related to changes in the severity of their psychological symptoms. Our results related to self-reported disability in the month prior to the interview were quite robust. Both the mean score to the BDQ and the ranked classification of the results of the BDQ found that the infertile patient group reported significantly greater impairment than that reported by women of the same age and marital status who were not infertile. In the absence of differences in the level of depressive and anxiety symptoms between the groups, this suggests that social discrimination of women in Turkey who cannot fulfil this expected role directly affects their functioning. To our knowledge, no previous study has reported the level of disability among infertile subjects. The reasons for the more prominent depressive and anxiety symptoms and greater impairment in the quality of life among employed women who are infertile compared to that in unemployed women who are infertile are unknown. Presumably this is related to the greater exposure employed women who are infertile have to social disapproval than unemployed women (who primarily work in the home as housewives), but further qualitative studies will be needed to clarify this issue.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. (a) The cross-sectional nature of the study made it impossible to identify causal relationships between infertility and the various psychological, functional, and quality of life measures assessed. (b) All measures employed were self-rated, so different types of reporting biases may have affected the results. (c) There was no formal diagnosis made of the patients or controls so the proportion that had psychological disorders that were severe enough to merit psychiatric intervention was unknown. (d) The sample was selected from married women with infertility being treated at an urban outpatient department, so the results may not be generalizable to all infertile women. (e) Sexual dysfunction, a common problem in infertile couples, was not considered among the eight aspects of quality of life assessed by the SF-36. (f) Several factors that may affect the psychosocial effects of infertility (e.g., duration of infertility, use of different fertility treatments, etc.) were not considered. Finally, (g) the sample of infertile patients was not large enough to employ multivariate linear regression analyses (or other multivariate techniques) to assess the relative importance of potential demographic and clinical treatment determinants of depression, anxiety, perceived disability, or quality of life.

Importance

This study found that the self-reported level of disability and levels of several measures of the quality of life of infertile married women in Turkey, particularly those who are currently employed, are significantly lower than those of fertile married women. However, the self-reported level of depressive and anxiety symptoms was not different between infertile and fertile women. This disconnect between psychological symptoms, functioning, and quality of life suggests that western assumptions about the causal relation of major psychosocial stressors (such as infertility) to common mental disorders may need to be adjusted when considering non-western cultures, where the meaning and psychological valence of specific types of stressors can be quite different. Only a minority of infertile participants had clinically significant depression (43%) or clinically significant anxiety (33%), so psychosocial interventions for infertile women should focus on social support and place somewhat less emphasis on psychiatric treatment. However, this is a small crosssectional study in one urban clinic in Turkey, so larger studies that enroll a broader spectrum of infertile patients and that follow them over time are needed to confirm the relevance of these findings.
  31 in total

1.  Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends.

Authors:  W D Mosher; W F Pratt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Suffering of childless women in Bangladesh: the intersection of social identities of gender and class.

Authors:  Papreen Nahar; Annemiek Richters
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  Psychosocial adjustment to unsuccessful IVF and GIFT treatment.

Authors:  S M Weaver; E Clifford; D M Hay; J Robinson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997-05

4.  Grief, depression, and coping in women undergoing infertility treatment.

Authors:  M P Lukse; N A Vacc
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The psychological component of infertility.

Authors:  P P Mahlstedt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Infertility, mental disorders and well-being--a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Reija Klemetti; Jani Raitanen; Sinikka Sihvo; Samuli Saarni; Päivikki Koponen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Psychological improvement in infertile women after behavioral treatment: a replication.

Authors:  A D Domar; P C Zuttermeister; M Seibel; H Benson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Is fertility-problem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples.

Authors:  F M Andrews; A Abbey; L J Halman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Health-related quality of life in relation to gender and age in couples planning IVF treatment.

Authors:  M Fekkes; S E Buitendijk; G H W Verrips; D D M Braat; A M A Brewaeys; J G Dolfing; M Kortman; R A Leerentveld; N S Macklon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  15 in total

1.  Analysis of Related Factors of Coping Styles in Infertile Patients in Central China.

Authors:  Jing Mao; Huiping Guo; Juan Wang; Ying Li; Meng Xu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Assessment of family function impact on depression severity among infertile women attending a teaching hospital in South-South Nigeria.

Authors:  Alex A Adelosoye; Olumuyiwa J Fasipe; Elihu I Medunoye; Onyekachukwu C Adelosoye; Elisha O Sunday
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-06-03

3.  The Relation Between Religious Coping, Adjustment to Fertility, Being Affected by Infertility, and Satisfaction with Life in Turkish Women with Infertility.

Authors:  Gulbahtiyar Demirel; Feride Taskin Yilmaz; Ayse Gonca Yenicesu
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-07-03

4.  Quality of life and general health of infertile women.

Authors:  Azam Namdar; Mohammad Mehdi Naghizadeh; Marziyeh Zamani; Farideh Yaghmaei; Mohammad Hadi Sameni
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Comment on "Disability, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Infertile Women: A Cross-Sectional Study In Turkey".

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Antonio Simone Laganà
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-25

6.  The impact of melatonin on the sleep patterns of women undergoing IVF: a double blind RCT.

Authors:  Shavi Fernando; Sarah Nichole Biggs; Rosemary Sylvia Claire Horne; Beverley Vollenhoven; Nicholas Lolatgis; Nicole Hope; Melissa Wong; Mark Lawrence; Anthony Lawrence; Chris Russell; Kenneth Leong; Philip Thomas; Luk Rombauts; Euan Morrison Wallace
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-01-06

7.  Smartphone-supported Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI) for couples undergoing fertility treatment: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Maren Schick; Sabine Roesner; Ariane Germeyer; Markus Moessner; Stephanie Bauer; Beate Ditzen; Tewes Wischmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  The comparison of depression and anxiety between fertile and infertile couples: A meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Hossein Fallahzadeh; Hasan Zareei Mahmood Abadi; Mahdieh Momayyezi; Hakimeh Malaki Moghadam; Naeimeh Keyghobadi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-05-05

9.  Depression, sexual dysfunction and sexual quality of life in women with infertility.

Authors:  Zahra Shahraki; Fatemeh Davari Tanha; Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Association of depression and resilience with fertility quality of life among patients presenting to the infertility centre for treatment in Karachi, Pakistan.

Authors:  Shireen Shehzad Bhamani; Nida Zahid; Wajeeha Zahid; Salima Farooq; Saima Sachwani; Marilyn Chapman; Nargis Asad
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.