Literature DB >> 27605155

Massively parallel sequencing of customised forensically informative SNP panels on the MiSeq.

Bhavik Mehta1, Runa Daniel2, Chris Phillips3, Stephen Doyle4, Gareth Elvidge5, Dennis McNevin6.   

Abstract

Forensic DNA-based intelligence, or forensic DNA phenotyping, utilises SNPs to infer the biogeographical ancestry and externally visible characteristics of the donor of evidential material. SNaPshot® is a commonly employed forensic SNP genotyping technique, which is limited to multiplexes of 30-40 SNPs in a single reaction and prone to PCR contamination. Massively parallel sequencing has the ability to genotype hundreds of SNPs in multiple samples simultaneously by employing an oligonucleotide sample barcoding strategy. This study of the Illumina MiSeq massively parallel sequencing platform analysed 136 unique SNPs in 48 samples from SNaPshot PCR amplicons generated by five established forensic DNA phenotyping assays comprising the SNPforID 52-plex, SNPforID 34-plex, Eurasiaplex, Pacifiplex and IrisPlex. Approximately 3 GB of sequence data were generated from two MiSeq flow cells and profiles were obtained from just 0.25 ng of DNA. Compared with SNaPshot, an average 98% genotyping concordance was achieved. Our customised approach was successful in attaining SNP profiles from extremely degraded, inhibited, and compromised casework samples. Heterozygote imbalance and sequence coverage in negative controls highlight the need to establish baseline sequence coverage thresholds and refine allele frequency thresholds. This study demonstrates the potential of the MiSeq for forensic SNP analysis.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic DNA genotyping; Illumina MiSeq; Next generation sequencing (NGS); SNPs; SNaPshot

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605155     DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  6 in total

1.  The QIAGEN 140-locus single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for forensic identification using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): an evaluation and a direct-to-PCR trial.

Authors:  I Avent; A G Kinnane; N Jones; I Petermann; R Daniel; M E Gahan; D McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Comparison between magnetic bead and qPCR library normalisation methods for forensic MPS genotyping.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Samantha Venables; Paul Roffey
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  Forensically relevant SNaPshot® assays for human DNA SNP analysis: a review.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Runa Daniel; Chris Phillips; Dennis McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Evaluation of the VISAGE Basic Tool for Appearance and Ancestry Prediction Using PowerSeq Chemistry on the MiSeq FGx System.

Authors:  Leire Palencia-Madrid; Catarina Xavier; María de la Puente; Carsten Hohoff; Christopher Phillips; Manfred Kayser; Walther Parson
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 5.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Massively parallel sequencing of Cannabis sativa chloroplast hotspots for forensic typing.

Authors:  Madeline G Roman; Ryan Gutierrez; Rachel Houston
Journal:  J Cannabis Res       Date:  2022-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.