J M Fiszdon1, K H Choi2, M D Bell1, J Choi3, S M Silverstein4. 1. VA Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale University School of Medicine,Psychology Service (116B),950 Campbell Avenue,West Haven, CT,USA. 2. Department of Psychology,Korea University,Seoul,Republic of Korea. 3. The Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital,200 Retreat Avenue,Hartford, CT,USA. 4. Rutgers University - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Department of Psychiatry and University Behavioral Health Care,151 Centennial Avenue,Piscataway, NJ,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The popularity of cognitive remediation (CR) interventions for individuals with psychosis is in part based on the well-established link between cognition and functioning and the assumption that by targeting cognition, function can improve. While numerous trials have reported CR's efficacy, it is still not considered an evidence-based treatment. Importantly, little is known about the mechanisms through which it may affect functioning. METHOD: In this study, we evaluated CR's proximal and distal effects, and examined potential mechanisms. A total of 75 individuals with psychotic disorders were randomized to a combination of strategy-based and drill-and-practice CR or wait-list control, with assessments of training task performance, neurocognition, functional capacity, symptoms and functioning conducted at baseline, end of the 2-month intervention, and 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with treatment as usual, CR was associated with large post-training improvements on training tasks targeting attention, visuospatial memory, and verbal learning and memory, with persisting group differences at the 2-month follow-up. These generalized to mostly large improvements on neuropsychological measures targeting visuospatial memory, verbal learning and memory, delayed verbal memory and verbal working memory. While there were no CR-associated improvements on measures of functional capacity, symptoms, or a self-report measure of independent living skills, there was an effect on an interviewer-rated measure of functioning (Quality of Life Scale), which appeared primarily driven by the Intrapsychic Foundations subscale. Finally, for those randomized to CR, there were significant, medium-sized correlations between training task improvement, neuropsychological improvement and functioning measures. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests a complex, multifactorial relationship between CR, and cognitive and functional change.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The popularity of cognitive remediation (CR) interventions for individuals with psychosis is in part based on the well-established link between cognition and functioning and the assumption that by targeting cognition, function can improve. While numerous trials have reported CR's efficacy, it is still not considered an evidence-based treatment. Importantly, little is known about the mechanisms through which it may affect functioning. METHOD: In this study, we evaluated CR's proximal and distal effects, and examined potential mechanisms. A total of 75 individuals with psychotic disorders were randomized to a combination of strategy-based and drill-and-practice CR or wait-list control, with assessments of training task performance, neurocognition, functional capacity, symptoms and functioning conducted at baseline, end of the 2-month intervention, and 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with treatment as usual, CR was associated with large post-training improvements on training tasks targeting attention, visuospatial memory, and verbal learning and memory, with persisting group differences at the 2-month follow-up. These generalized to mostly large improvements on neuropsychological measures targeting visuospatial memory, verbal learning and memory, delayed verbal memory and verbal working memory. While there were no CR-associated improvements on measures of functional capacity, symptoms, or a self-report measure of independent living skills, there was an effect on an interviewer-rated measure of functioning (Quality of Life Scale), which appeared primarily driven by the Intrapsychic Foundations subscale. Finally, for those randomized to CR, there were significant, medium-sized correlations between training task improvement, neuropsychological improvement and functioning measures. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests a complex, multifactorial relationship between CR, and cognitive and functional change.
Authors: Britta Hahn; Megan E Shrieves; Marie B Yuille; Robert W Buchanan; Ashleigh K Wells Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Natalie de la Garrigue; Juliana Glasser; Pejman Sehatpour; Dan V Iosifescu; Elisa Dias; Marlene Carlson; Constance Shope; Tarek Sobeih; Tse-Hwei Choo; Melanie M Wall; Lawrence S Kegeles; James Gangwisch; Megan Mayer; Stephanie Brazis; Heloise M De Baun; Stephanie Wolfer; Dalton Bermudez; Molly Arnold; Danielle Rette; Amir M Meftah; Melissa Conant; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Joshua T Kantrowitz Journal: J Psychiatr Brain Sci Date: 2020-08-06
Authors: Jin Yang Li; Huiqin Wu; Shiting Yuan; Chun Wang; Qian Wang; Yuan Zhong; Ning Zhang; Kathi Heffner; Peter T Fox Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Emily P Hedges; Hannah Dickson; Stefania Tognin; Gemma Modinos; Mathilde Antoniades; Mark van der Gaag; Lieuwe de Haan; Patrick McGorry; Christos Pantelis; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Rodrigo Bressan; Neus Barrantes-Vidal; Marie-Odile Krebs; Merete Nordentoft; Stephan Ruhrmann; Gabriele Sachs; Bart P Rutten; Jim van Os; Lucia R Valmaggia; Philip McGuire; Matthew J Kempton Journal: Schizophr Res Cogn Date: 2021-10-28
Authors: Antonio Rampino; Rosa M Falcone; Arianna Giannuzzi; Rita Masellis; Linda A Antonucci; Silvia Torretta Journal: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Date: 2021-05-24