Literature DB >> 27604521

Conservation implications of anthropogenic impacts on visual communication and camouflage.

Kaspar Delhey1, Anne Peters1.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic environmental impacts can disrupt the sensory environment of animals and affect important processes from mate choice to predator avoidance. Currently, these effects are best understood for auditory and chemosensory modalities, and recent reviews highlight their importance for conservation. We examined how anthropogenic changes to the visual environment (ambient light, transmission, and backgrounds) affect visual communication and camouflage and considered the implications of these effects for conservation. Human changes to the visual environment can increase predation risk by affecting camouflage effectiveness, lead to maladaptive patterns of mate choice, and disrupt mutualistic interactions between pollinators and plants. Implications for conservation are particularly evident for disrupted camouflage due to its tight links with survival. The conservation importance of impaired visual communication is less documented. The effects of anthropogenic changes on visual communication and camouflage may be severe when they affect critical processes such as pollination or species recognition. However, when impaired mate choice does not lead to hybridization, the conservation consequences are less clear. We suggest that the demographic effects of human impacts on visual communication and camouflage will be particularly strong when human-induced modifications to the visual environment are evolutionarily novel (i.e., very different from natural variation); affected species and populations have low levels of intraspecific (genotypic and phenotypic) variation and behavioral, sensory, or physiological plasticity; and the processes affected are directly related to survival (camouflage), species recognition, or number of offspring produced, rather than offspring quality or attractiveness. Our findings suggest that anthropogenic effects on the visual environment may be of similar importance relative to conservation as anthropogenic effects on other sensory modalities.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cambio climático; climate change; color; contaminación; cripsis; crypsis; degradación del hábitat; habitat degradation; light; luz; pollution; turbidez del agua; urbanización; urbanization; water turbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604521     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Animal coloration research: why it matters.

Authors:  Tim Caro; Mary Caswell Stoddard; Devi Stuart-Fox
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes.

Authors:  E Dale Broder; Damian O Elias; Rafael L Rodríguez; Gil G Rosenthal; Brett M Seymoure; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Artificial night light alters nocturnal prey interception outcomes for morphologically variable spiders.

Authors:  Suet Wai Yuen; Timothy C Bonebrake
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Enlightening Butterfly Conservation Efforts: The Importance of Natural Lighting for Butterfly Behavioral Ecology and Conservation.

Authors:  Brett M Seymoure
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 5.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.167

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.