| Literature DB >> 27604417 |
Rupert Weaver1,2, Linda Reiling1, Gaoqian Feng1, Damien R Drew1, Ivo Mueller3,4,5, Peter M Siba6, Takafumi Tsuboi7, Jack S Richards1,2,8, Freya J I Fowkes1,9,10, James G Beeson1,2,8.
Abstract
Understanding the targets and mechanisms of human immunity to malaria is important for advancing the development of highly efficacious vaccines and serological tools for malaria surveillance. The PfRH5 and PfRipr proteins form a complex on the surface of P. falciparum merozoites that is essential for invasion of erythrocytes and are vaccine candidates. We determined IgG subclass responses to these proteins among malaria-exposed individuals in Papua New Guinea and their association with protection from malaria in a longitudinal cohort of children. Cytophilic subclasses, IgG1 and IgG3, were predominant with limited IgG2 and IgG4, and IgG subclass-specific responses were higher in older children and those with active infection. High IgG3 to PfRH5 and PfRipr were significantly and strongly associated with reduced risk of malaria after adjusting for potential confounding factors, whereas associations for IgG1 responses were generally weaker and not statistically significant. Results further indicated that malaria exposure leads to the co-acquisition of IgG1 and IgG3 to PfRH5 and PfRipr, as well as to other PfRH invasion ligands, PfRH2 and PfRH4. These findings suggest that IgG3 responses to PfRH5 and PfRipr may play a significant role in mediating naturally-acquired immunity and support their potential as vaccine candidates and their use as antibody biomarkers of immunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27604417 PMCID: PMC5015043 DOI: 10.1038/srep33094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Reactivity of IgG subclasses to PfRH5 and PfRipr in PNG adults.
Optical density (OD) values obtained for a selection of sera from malaria exposed PNG adults (n = 24) for (A) PfRH5 and (B) PfRipr specific IgG subclass reactivity. Bars represent median value. Error bars represent interquartile range.
Figure 2Seroprevalence of total IgG and subclass response to PfRH5 and PfRipr by age.
IgG seroprevalence to PfRH5 and PfRipr recombinant proteins measured by ELISA. Results are shown as percentage seropositive.. Error bars indicate standard error of proportion (SE). Results are shown by Age (<9 or >9 years of age). Top row: PfRH5. Bottom row: PfRipr. Results are shown for (A)/(D) Total IgG, (B)/(E). IgG1 and (C)/(F) IgG3 left to right. P values indicate chi square test.
Figure 3Seroprevalence of total IgG and subclass response to PfRH5 and PfRipr by concurrent parasitemia measured by PCR.
Results are shown as percentage seropositive, as determined by ELISA. Error bars indicate standard error of proportion (SE). Results are shown by parasitemic status at enrolment (PCR(−) or PCR(+)). Top row: PfRH5 Bottom row: PfRipr. Results are shown for (A)/(D) Total IgG, (B)/(E) IgG1 and (C)/(F) IgG3 left to right. P values indicate chi square test.
Spearman’s ρ between IgG, IgG1 and IgG3 to PfRH family proteins: PfRH5; PfRipr; PfRH2; PfRH4.
| PfRh5 | PfRipr | PfRh2 | PfRh4 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | IgG | IgG1 | IgG3 | ||
| PfRh5 | IgG | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
| IgG1 | 0.58 | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | |
| IgG3 | 0.76 | 0.49 | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | |
| PfRipr | IgG | 0.82 | 0.56 | 0.76 | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
| IgG1 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.69 | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | |
| IgG3 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.53 | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | |
| PfRh2 | IgG | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.31 | … | … | … | … | … | … |
| IgG1 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.88 | … | … | … | … | … | |
| IgG3 | 0.51 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.46 | … | … | … | … | |
| PfRh4 | IgG | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.3 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.41 | … | … | … |
| IgG1 | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.93 | … | … | |
| IgG3 | 0.44 | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.39 | 0.39 | … |
Spearman ρ are shown for total IgG and subclasses IgG1 and 3 to PfRH5; PfRipr; PfRH4; PfRH2 in 206 Papua New Guinean children. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001. PfRH2 construct was PfRH2.2030. PfRH4 construct was PfRH4.9.
Figure 4Risk of symptomatic P. falciparum episode during follow-up relative to IgG1 and IgG3 to PfRH5.
Kaplan-Meier curves show the proportion of children that remained free of malaria episodes over time for IgG subclass responses against PfRH5 and PfRipr (A) IgG1 to PfRH5; (B) IgG3 to PfRH5; (C) IgG1 to PfRipr; (D) IgG3 to PfRH5. Antibody responses were divided into 3 equal response groups: high (green line), medium (red line), and low (blue line) antibody reactivity. Unadjusted data are shown. Wilcoxon log rank tests were carried out: (A) p = 0.004; (B) p < 0.001; (C) p < 0.001; (D) p < 0.001 Symptomatic P. falciparum infection was defined as fever (>37 °C) plus a parasite load of 5000 parasites/μl.
Association between antibodies and risk of clinical malaria.
| Antigen | Antibody | Comparison | HR (95% CI) | p Value | aHR(95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PfRh5 | IgG (Total) | MvL | 0.46 (0.2–1.06) | 0.07 | 0.53 (0.23–1.25) | 0.15 |
| IgG (Total) | HvL | 0.27 (0.1–0.72) | 0.01 | 0.35 (0.12–0.96) | 0.04 | |
| IgG1 | MvL | 0.81 (0.37–1.79) | 0.61 | 0.98 (0.44–2.183) | 0.97 | |
| IgG1 | HvL | 0.36 (0.13–.99) | 0.05 | 0.46 (0.16–1.29) | 0.14 | |
| IgG3 | MvL | 0.49 (0.28–0.84) | 0.01 | 0.54 (0.31–0.95) | 0.03 | |
| IgG3 | HvL | 0.26 (0.14–0.50) | 0.01 | 0.35 (0.17–0.71) | 0.03 | |
| PfRipr | IgG (Total) | MvL | 0.41 (0.18–0.94) | 0.04 | 0.51 (0.22–1.21) | 0.13 |
| IgG (Total) | HvL | 0.2 (0.07–0.6) | 0.004 | 0.24 (0.08–0.73) | 0.01 | |
| IgG1 | MvL | 0.53 (0.23–1.22) | 0.14 | 0.6 (0.26–1.38) | 0.23 | |
| IgG1 | HvL | 0.38 (0.15–0.99) | 0.05 | 0.48 (0.19–1.26) | 0.14 | |
| IgG3 | MvL | 0.66 (0.38–1.13) | 0.13 | 0.79 (0.45–1.38) | 0.41 | |
| IgG3 | HvL | 0.29 (0.15–0.55) | <0.001 | 0.36 (0.18–0.72) | 0.004 |
Study participants were stratified into 3 equal groups according to low, medium or high levels of PfRH5-specific or PfRipr-specific antibodies antibodies. Hazard ratios were calculated comparing high versus low levels of antibodies (HvL) and medium versus low levels (MvL) of antibodies for the risk of symptomatic malaria over 6 months of follow-up; analysis was based on first episode only. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted hazard ratios hazard ratios (aHR; adjusted for age and location of residence) with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] were calculated. During the follow-up period, 80 children experienced at least one episode of clinical malaria.