| Literature DB >> 27604261 |
Alice Luddi1, Angela Capaldo1, Riccardo Focarelli2, Martina Gori1, Giuseppe Morgante1, Paola Piomboni3, Vincenzo De Leo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The status characterized by the imbalance between pro-oxidants and antioxidants molecules, defined as oxidative stress, has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of subfertility in females. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a complete micronutrients supplementation on oxidative stress levels in follicular microenvironment as well as on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Follicular fluid; In vitro fertilization; Micronutrients; Oocyte quality; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27604261 PMCID: PMC5015196 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0184-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Characteristics of patients who underwent the two IVF cycles, without (untreated) and with (treated) micronutrients supplementation
| Variable | Untreated | Treated |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 18 | — | |
| Age (yrs) | 40.3 ± 1.2 | — | |
| Duration of infertility (months) | 26.1 ± 8.2 | — | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.5 ± 3.0 | — | |
| Duration of stimulation (days) | 11.5 ± 0.9 | 12.1 ± 1.4 | NS |
| E2 peak level | 2,315 ± 490 | 2,270 ± 515 | NS |
Note: Values are mean ± SD. NS not significant
Fig. 1Total antioxidant capacity in follicular fluid and in serum from untreated patient (white bars) or patient treated with micronutrients supplementation (gray bars). The values are the mean of three determinations ± SD. Statistically significant difference in total antioxidant capacity is indicated (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Avidin-blotting after two dimensional electrophoresis of biotin-labeled free-SH residues in serum (a, b) and follicular fluid (c, d) from untreated patient (a, c) or patient treated with micronutrients supplementation (b, d). The values are the mean ± SD. Statistically significant difference in relative intensity is indicated (*P < 0.05)
Oocyte maturity and embryo score in the same patients who didn’t received (Untreated) or received (Treated) micronutrients supplementation form three months
| Characteristic | Untreated | Treated |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of retrieved oocytes | 6.76 ± 4.12 | 6.37 ± 3.31 | NS |
| No. of MII oocytes | 5.14 ± 3.49 | 4.07 ± 3.04 | NS |
| No. of not suitable oocytes (GV-DEG) | 1.88 ± 1.01 | 1.2 ± 0.77 | 0.01 |
| Fertilization rate | 0.69 ± 0,15 | 0.71 ± 0,28 | NS |
| Cleavage rate | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | NS |
| No. of embryos transfered | 2.01 ± 0.55 | 1.96 ± 0.75 | NS |
| Embryo score grade 1 (%) | 0.96 ± 0.5 | 0.91 ± 0.45 | NS |
| Embryo score grade 2 (%) | 0.87 ± 0.75 | 0.84 ± 0.71 | NS |
| Embryo score grade 3 (%) | 0.29 ± 0.64 | 0.30 ± 0.5 | NS |
Note: Values are mean ± SD. The embryos were scored according to the criteria established by Ebner et al. [27]. DEG degenerated occytes, MII metaphase II, NS not significant; GV germinal vesicle