Literature DB >> 27604126

The application of regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in gas phase.

M Antonia Lopez-Anton1, Nuria Fernández-Miranda2, M Rosa Martínez-Tarazona2.   

Abstract

Mercury is a well-known toxic element, and flue gas streams emitted from coal-fired utilities are one of the largest anthropogenic sources of this element. This study briefly reviews the proposed technologies for reducing mercury emissions from coal combustion, focusing on an emerging process which involves the use of regenerable sorbents and especially those loaded with noble metals. Among the mercury species formed during coal combustion, elemental mercury is the most difficult to remove from the flue gases due to its low reactivity and insolubility in water. The widespread interest in using regenerable sorbents with metals is due to their ability to retain elemental mercury. With this technology, not only can efficiencies of 100 % be reached in the retention of elemental mercury but also a way to avoid the generation of new wastes loaded with mercury. This study considers the main aspects that must be taken into account when developing effective regenerable sorbents for mercury capture, with special attention to sorbents containing noble metals. The characteristics of this process are compared with those of other processes in a more advanced state of development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal combustion; Control; Mercury; Regenerable; Sorbent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604126     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7534-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  10 in total

1.  An assessment of costs and benefits associated with mercury emission reductions from major anthropogenic sources.

Authors:  Jozef M Pacyna; Kyrre Sundseth; Elisabeth G Pacyna; Wojciech Jozewicz; John Munthe; Mohammed Belhaj; Stefan Aström
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Turkevich method for gold nanoparticle synthesis revisited.

Authors:  J Kimling; M Maier; B Okenve; V Kotaidis; H Ballot; A Plech
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Influence of temperature and regeneration cycles on Hg capture and efficiency by structured Au/C regenerable sorbents.

Authors:  D Ballestero; C Gómez-Giménez; E García-Díez; R Juan; B Rubio; M T Izquierdo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Differential partitioning and speciation of Hg in wet FGD facilities of two Spanish PCC power plants.

Authors:  R Ochoa-González; P Córdoba; M Díaz-Somoano; O Font; M A López-Antón; C Leiva; M R Martínez-Tarazona; X Querol; C Fernández Pereira; A Tomás; P Gómez; P Mesado
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Tail-end Hg capture on Au/carbon-monolith regenerable sorbents.

Authors:  M Teresa Izquierdo; Diego Ballestero; Roberto Juan; Enrique García-Díez; Begoña Rubio; Carmen Ruiz; M Rosa Pino
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 6.  Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  Manuela Rallo; M Antonia Lopez-Anton; M Luisa Contreras; M Mercedes Maroto-Valer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Novel regenerable sorbent for mercury capture from flue gases of coal-fired power plant.

Authors:  Yan Liu; David J A Kelly; Hongqun Yang; Christopher C H Lin; Steve M Kuznicki; Zhenghe Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Mercury removal from flue gases by novel regenerable magnetic nanocomposite sorbents.

Authors:  Jie Dong; Zhenghe Xu; Steven M Kuznicki
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in simulated coal combustion flue gas.

Authors:  Jorge Rodríguez-Pérez; M Antonia López-Antón; Mercedes Díaz-Somoano; Roberto García; M Rosa Martínez-Tarazona
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  DOE/NETL's phase II mercury control technology field testing program: preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection.

Authors:  Andrew P Jones; Jeffrey W Hoffmann; Dennis N Smith; Thomas J Feeley; James T Murphy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.