Andreas Eickhorst1, Andrea Schreier2, Christian Brand3, Katrin Lang4, Christoph Liel2, Ilona Renner5, Anna Neumann5, Alexandra Sann2. 1. Fachgruppe Nationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Deutsches Jugendinstitut e. V., Nockherstr. 2, 81541, München, Deutschland. eickhorst@dji.de. 2. Fachgruppe Nationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Deutsches Jugendinstitut e. V., Nockherstr. 2, 81541, München, Deutschland. 3. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. Erziehungs- und Familienberatungsstelle Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Deutschland. 5. Nationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen in der Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Köln, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Federal Initiative for Early Prevention (funded by German ministry BMFSFJ), through the development of specific assistance programmes, supports families that suffer from psychosocial burden. As nationally representative data are missing, the National Centre for Early Prevention carried out a national survey on the psychosocial burden experienced by families with children aged 0-3 years. AIMS: Ascertainment of the connections between family-related psychosocial burden and knowledge and use of different assistance programmes. DATA AND METHODS: Via paediatricians, 8063 parents were recruited to complete a questionnaire on objective burden, subjective experience of burden as well as knowledge and use of assistance programmes. Differences in knowledge and use between educational groups were tested by means of chi-squared tests. Very good knowledge of available assistance programmes and the offer and acceptance of aid by family midwives were subjected to regression analyses. RESULTS: Clear differences in knowledge and use of individual assistance programmes between educational groups were observed. Many programmes are predominantly used by better educated families, although there are exceptions, for example in the case of family midwives. Despite generally small group differences, less-educated families are the proportionally largest user group of family midwives. Furthermore we present average predicted percentages of knowledge and use for specific groups of psychosocially burdened parents as derived from the regression analyses. DISCUSSION: The results are discussed in the context of barriers to access for individual assistance programmes as well as their match with families' needs in the practice of early prevention.
BACKGROUND: The Federal Initiative for Early Prevention (funded by German ministry BMFSFJ), through the development of specific assistance programmes, supports families that suffer from psychosocial burden. As nationally representative data are missing, the National Centre for Early Prevention carried out a national survey on the psychosocial burden experienced by families with children aged 0-3 years. AIMS: Ascertainment of the connections between family-related psychosocial burden and knowledge and use of different assistance programmes. DATA AND METHODS: Via paediatricians, 8063 parents were recruited to complete a questionnaire on objective burden, subjective experience of burden as well as knowledge and use of assistance programmes. Differences in knowledge and use between educational groups were tested by means of chi-squared tests. Very good knowledge of available assistance programmes and the offer and acceptance of aid by family midwives were subjected to regression analyses. RESULTS: Clear differences in knowledge and use of individual assistance programmes between educational groups were observed. Many programmes are predominantly used by better educated families, although there are exceptions, for example in the case of family midwives. Despite generally small group differences, less-educated families are the proportionally largest user group of family midwives. Furthermore we present average predicted percentages of knowledge and use for specific groups of psychosocially burdened parents as derived from the regression analyses. DISCUSSION: The results are discussed in the context of barriers to access for individual assistance programmes as well as their match with families' needs in the practice of early prevention.
Entities:
Keywords:
Early prevention; Educational groups; Family midwive; Psychosocial burden; Usage
Authors: J Fricke; M Bolster; C Ludwig-Körner; L Kuchinke; F Schlensog-Schuster; P Vienhues; T Reinhold; A Berghöfer; S Roll; T Keil Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Christine Klapp; Silvia Fisch; Theresa Keller; Ulrike Stasun; Nurina Nazmy; Cynthia Hohmann; Larry Hinkson; Wolfgang Henrich; Karl E Bergmann; Renate L Bergmann; Thomas Keil Journal: Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol Date: 2019-08-22
Authors: Gloria Metzner; Sabine Horstmann; Manuela Glattacker; Ilona Renner; Michael Barth; Jürgen M Giesler; Susanne Jünemann; Klaus Kaier; Christian Schlett; Nora Schroeder; Marcus Siebolds; Frank Sinss; Juliane van Staa Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Susanne Brandstetter; David Rothfuß; Birgit Seelbach-Göbel; Michael Melter; Michael Kabesch; Christian Apfelbacher Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Daniel M Faßbender; Katharina Kreffter; Simon Götz; Maurus Hagemeister; Stefanie Lisak-Wahl; Thuy Ha Nguyen; Theodor Stemper; Simone Weyers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 3.390