Literature DB >> 27604115

[Knowledge and use of different support programs in the context of early prevention in relation to family-related psychosocial burden].

Andreas Eickhorst1, Andrea Schreier2, Christian Brand3, Katrin Lang4, Christoph Liel2, Ilona Renner5, Anna Neumann5, Alexandra Sann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Federal Initiative for Early Prevention (funded by German ministry BMFSFJ), through the development of specific assistance programmes, supports families that suffer from psychosocial burden. As nationally representative data are missing, the National Centre for Early Prevention carried out a national survey on the psychosocial burden experienced by families with children aged 0-3 years. AIMS: Ascertainment of the connections between family-related psychosocial burden and knowledge and use of different assistance programmes. DATA AND METHODS: Via paediatricians, 8063 parents were recruited to complete a questionnaire on objective burden, subjective experience of burden as well as knowledge and use of assistance programmes. Differences in knowledge and use between educational groups were tested by means of chi-squared tests. Very good knowledge of available assistance programmes and the offer and acceptance of aid by family midwives were subjected to regression analyses.
RESULTS: Clear differences in knowledge and use of individual assistance programmes between educational groups were observed. Many programmes are predominantly used by better educated families, although there are exceptions, for example in the case of family midwives. Despite generally small group differences, less-educated families are the proportionally largest user group of family midwives. Furthermore we present average predicted percentages of knowledge and use for specific groups of psychosocially burdened parents as derived from the regression analyses. DISCUSSION: The results are discussed in the context of barriers to access for individual assistance programmes as well as their match with families' needs in the practice of early prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early prevention; Educational groups; Family midwive; Psychosocial burden; Usage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604115     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-016-2422-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  7 in total

1.  Cognitive Profiles of Children with Low Motor Performance: A Contribution to the Validation of the WPPSI-IV.

Authors:  Julia Jascenoka; Franziska Walter
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Occurrence and determinants of parental psychosocial stress and mental health disorders in parents and their children in early childhood: rationale, objectives, and design of the population-based SKKIPPI cohort study.

Authors:  J Fricke; M Bolster; C Ludwig-Körner; L Kuchinke; F Schlensog-Schuster; P Vienhues; T Reinhold; A Berghöfer; S Roll; T Keil
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  How effective is the early support program Babylotse-Plus for psychosocially burdened mothers and their infants? A comparative intervention study.

Authors:  Christine Klapp; Silvia Fisch; Theresa Keller; Ulrike Stasun; Nurina Nazmy; Cynthia Hohmann; Larry Hinkson; Wolfgang Henrich; Karl E Bergmann; Renate L Bergmann; Thomas Keil
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2019-08-22

4.  Social inequalities in health of children and adolescents in Germany. Results of the cross-sectional KiGGS Wave 2 study.

Authors:  Benjamin Kuntz; Petra Rattay; Christina Poethko-Müller; Roma Thamm; Heike Hölling; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  J Health Monit       Date:  2018-09-19

5.  Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial.

Authors:  Gloria Metzner; Sabine Horstmann; Manuela Glattacker; Ilona Renner; Michael Barth; Jürgen M Giesler; Susanne Jünemann; Klaus Kaier; Christian Schlett; Nora Schroeder; Marcus Siebolds; Frank Sinss; Juliane van Staa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study.

Authors:  Susanne Brandstetter; David Rothfuß; Birgit Seelbach-Göbel; Michael Melter; Michael Kabesch; Christian Apfelbacher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Is the Level of Motor Development at School Entry Related to the Use of Municipal Exercise Programs? A Social-Differential Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel M Faßbender; Katharina Kreffter; Simon Götz; Maurus Hagemeister; Stefanie Lisak-Wahl; Thuy Ha Nguyen; Theodor Stemper; Simone Weyers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.