| Literature DB >> 27603922 |
Sitha Chan1, Sirima Suvarnakuta Jantama2, Sunthorn Kanchanatawee1, Kaemwich Jantama1.
Abstract
An optimization process with a cheap and abundant substrate is considered one of the factors affecting the price of the production of economical 2,3-Butanediol (2,3-BD). A combination of the conventional method and response surface methodology (RSM) was applied in this study. The optimized levels of pH, aeration rate, agitation speed, and substrate concentration (maltodextrin) were investigated to determine the cost-effectiveness of fermentative 2,3-BD production by metabolically-engineered Klebsiella oxytoca KMS005. Results revealed that pH, aeration rate, agitation speed, and maltodextrin concentration at levels of 6.0, 0.8 vvm, 400 rpm, and 150 g/L respectively were the optimal conditions. RSM also indicated that the agitation speed was the most influential parameter when either agitation and aeration interaction or agitation and substrate concentration interaction played important roles for 2,3-BD production by the strain from maltodextrin. Under interim fed-batch fermentation, 2,3-BD concentration, yield, and productivity were obtained at 88.1±0.2 g/L, 0.412±0.001 g/g, and 1.13±0.01 g/L/h respectively within 78 h.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27603922 PMCID: PMC5014425 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fermentation profiles for 2,3-BD production by K. oxytoca KMS005 at various pH values in AM1 medium containing 100 g/L maltodextrin.
| pH | Residual sugar | Max CDW | 2,3-BD | Gross yield | Productivity | By-products (g/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/g) | (g/L/h) | Suc | Lac | Eth | For | Ace | |
| uncontrolled | 67.1±2.2 | 1.0±0.1 | 11.6±1.5 | 0.12±0.01β | 0.16±0.01 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.5±0.1 |
| 5 | 60.1±4.3 | 2.4±0.1 | 15.1±1.8γ | 0.16±0.01γ | 0.21±0.02 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.4±0.3 |
| 5.5 | 33.0±2.2 | 2.9±0.1 | 23.2±1.6θ | 0.25±0.01θ | 0.32±0.02 | 1.8±0.3 | ND | ND | ND | 1.1±0.1 |
| 6 | 5.3±1.2 | 3.9±0.1 | 31.8±0.3π | 0.34±0.01π | 0.44±0.01 | 2.2±0.1 | ND | 1.9±0.1 | ND | ND |
| 6.5 | 1.0±0.3 | 4.2±0.1 | 31.3±1.2π | 0.33±0.01π | 0.43±0.02 | 3.4±0.1 | ND | 2.2±0.1 | ND | 1.7±0.1 |
| 7 | ND | 3.5±0.4 | 26.2±0.6Ұ | 0.28±0.01Ұ | 0.36±0.04 | 8.6±0.4 | ND | ND | ND | 10.7±0.9 |
a Gross yield was calculated as product concentration divided by initial total sugar concentration equivalent to 93 g/L of sugar content at 72 h incubation. Productivity was calculated at 72 h
b ND = not detected
c All data represent the averages of two fermentations with standard deviations. Values bearing different Greek symbols such as “β”, “γ”, “θ”, “π”, and “Ұ” are significantly different (P < 0.05)
d Suc: Succinate, Lac: Lactate, Eth: Ethanol, For: Formate, and Ace: Acetate
Fermentation profile for 2,3-BD production by K. oxytoca KMS005 at various aeration rates in AM1 medium containing 100 g/L maltodextrin.
| Aeration | Residual sugar | Max CDW | 2,3-BD | Gross yield | Productivity | By-products (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (vvm) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/g) | (g/L/h) | Suc | Eth | Ace |
| No air | 84.0±3.0 | 0.6±0.1 | 1.6±0.1 | 0.03±0.01β | 0.02±0.01 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.9±0.1 | 2.1±0.1 |
| 0.1 | 78.6±1.8 | 2.2±0.2 | 6.2±0.3γ | 0.06±0.01γ | 0.12±0.01 | 0.6±0.1 | ND | 1.0±0.1 |
| 0.8 | 12.7±1.9 | 4.7±0.2 | 27.9±0.1α | 0.30±0.01α | 0.58±0.01 | 3.2±0.1 | 2.2±0.2 | 0.6±0.1 |
| 1 | 4.5±2.5 | 4.4±0.2 | 32.1±1.4¥ | 0.34±0.01Ұ | 0.67±0.03 | 2.2±0.2 | 1.4±0.3 | 1.1±0.9 |
| 1.2 | 7.9±1.6 | 4.7±0.1 | 34.6±2.2¥ | 0.35±0.02Ұ | 0.72±0.05 | 1.5±0.2 | 1.3±0.1 | 0.2±0.1 |
a Gross yield was calculated as product concentration divided by initial total sugar concentration (10% (w/v) at 48 h incubation. Productivity was calculated at 48 h.
b ND = not detected.
c All data represent the averages of two fermentations with standard deviations. Values bearing different Greek symbols such as “β”, “γ”, “α”, “¥” and “Ұ” are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig 1Comparison of cell biomass and 2,3-BD production at 300 and 400 rpm.
Aeration, pH, and maltodextrin concentration were fixed at levels of 1.0 vvm, 6.0, and 10% (w/v) respectively.
Fermentation profile for 2,3-BD production by K. oxytoca KMS005 at various agitation speeds in AM1 medium containing 100 g/L maltodextrin.
| Agitation | Residual sugar | Max CDW | 2,3-BD | Gross yield | Productivity | By-products (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (rpm) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/g) | (g/L/h) | Suc | Eth | Ace |
| 200 | 4.5±2.5 | 4.4±0.2 | 32.1±1.4 | 0.34±0.01β | 0.67±0.03 | 2.2±0.2 | 1.4±0.3 | 1.1±0.9 |
| 300 | 1.6±0.1 | 4.8±0.1 | 36.6±0.6π | 0.39±0.01π | 0.76±0.01 | 2.2±0.4 | 0.8±0.1 | 1.2±0.2 |
| 400 | 1.0±0.1 | 4.4±0.1 | 35.4±2.6π | 0.38±0.02π | 0.73±0.05 | 1.4±0.1 | <0.1 | 0.9±0.1 |
| 500 | 31.3±3.1 | 4.4±0.2 | 23.7±0.1¥ | 0.25±0.01¥ | 0.49±0.01 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 2.6±0.6 |
a Gross yield was calculated as product concentration divided by initial total sugar concentration (10% (w/v) at 48 h incubation. Productivity was calculated at 48 h.
b All data represent the averages of two fermentations with standard deviations. Values bearing different Greek symbols such as “β”, “π”, and “¥”are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fermentation profile for 2,3-BD production by K. oxytoca KMS005 at various maltodextrin concentrations in AM1 medium.
| Maltodextrin | Residual sugar | Max CDW | 2,3-BD | Gross yield | Productivity | By-products (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/L) | (g/g) | (g/L/h) | Suc | Eth | Ace |
| 50 | ND | 2.8±0.1 | 15.1±0.3 | 0.32±0.02α | 0.21±0.03 | 1.4±0.5 | 1.0±0.2 | 2.3±0.1 |
| 100 | 1.6±0.1 | 4.8±0.1 | 36.6±0.6β | 0.39±0.01β | 0.73±0.05 | 2.2±0.4 | 0.8±0.1 | 1.2±0.2 |
| 150 | 16.6±4.1 | 4.8±0.3 | 50.4±2.4π | 0.36±0.02π | 1.05±0.05 | 1.0±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.9±0.0 |
| 200 | 30.7±4.5 | 4.9±0.0 | 74.7±0.2¥ | 0.40±0.01β | 1.04±0.16 | 0.9±0.2 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.8±0.1 |
| 250 | 78.3±2.4 | 4.6±0.0 | 73.4±2.4¥ | 0.31±0.01α | 1.02±0.03 | 1.1±0.4 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.7±0.3 |
a Yield was calculated as product concentration divided by initial total sugar concentration at 48 h for substrate concentration of 50, 100 and 150 g/L and at 72 h for 200 and 250 g/L. Productivity was calculated at 48 h for substrate concentration of 50, 100 and 150 g/L and at 72h for 200 and 250 g/L.
b All data represent the averages of two fermentations with standard deviations. Values bearing different Greek symbols such as “α”, “β”, “π”, and “¥” are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Experimental design of RSM strategy using three independent variables.
| Parameters and their levels | 2,3-BD Gross Yield | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aeration | Agitation | Maltodextrin | Predicted | Observed | Biomass | |
| Runs | (vvm) | (rpm) | (g/L) | (g/g) | (g/g) | (g/L) |
| 1 | 0.8 | 350 | 150 | 0.427±0.025 | 0.438±0.020 | 4.4±0.2 |
| 2 | 1 | 250 | 250 | 0.149±0.025 | 0.203±0.020 | 3.2±0.3 |
| 3 | 1.2 | 350 | 150 | 0.393±0.025 | 0.430±0.010 | 4.6±0.1 |
| 4 | 1 | 350 | 200 | 0.354±0.025 | 0.355±0.016 | 4.2±0.3 |
| 5 | 1.2 | 350 | 250 | 0.337±0.025 | 0.348±0.014 | 4.5±0.1 |
| 6 | 1 | 250 | 150 | 0.345±0.025 | 0.364±0.006 | 4.1±0.1 |
| 7 | 1 | 450 | 250 | 0.347±0.025 | 0.341±0.002 | 4.6±0.1 |
| 8 | 1.2 | 450 | 200 | 0.279±0.025 | 0.263±0.004 | 4.8±0.3 |
| 9 | 0.8 | 350 | 250 | 0.296±0.025 | 0.277±0.008 | 3.9±0.3 |
| 10 | 0.8 | 250 | 200 | 0.180±0.025 | 0.216±0.001 | 3.4±0.2 |
| 11 | 1 | 450 | 150 | 0.337±0.025 | 0.306±0.005 | 4.9±0.1 |
| 12 | 1.2 | 250 | 200 | 0.307±0.025 | 0.302±0.011 | 3.8±0.3 |
| 13 | 0.8 | 450 | 200 | 0.399±0.025 | 0.431±0.001 | 4.9±0.2 |
a Gross yield was calculated at 72 h.
Fig 23D structures of optimum points of aeration, agitation, and substrate concentration: (a) the plot between aeration and agitation, (b) the plot between agitation and substrate concentration, (c) the plot between aeration and substrate concentration.
Fig 3Batch fermentation profile for 2,3-BD production from maltodextrin performed under optimized agitation speed, aeration rate, and maltodextrin concentration.
Fig 4Gross yield comparisons obtained during fermentation.
Fig 5Fed-batch fermentation profile for 2,3-BD production from maltodextrin by KMS005 under optimum conditions.
Comparison of 2,3-BD production by Klebsiella species from glucose-based medium and microorganisms.
| Organism | Substrate/Medium/Condition | 2,3-BD | Yield | Productivity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/L) | (g/g) | (g/L/h) | |||
| 150 g/L maltodextrin (140 g/L of glucose), supplemented with AM1 mineral salt medium, pH6.0, 0.8 vvm, Fed batch, 78 h incubation, 37°C, 400 rpm. | 88.1 | 0.412 | 1.13 a | This study | |
| 80–100 g/L glucose, supplemented with define medium, 5 g/L yeast extract 10 g/L casamino acid, 25 μg/ mL chloramphenicol, pH6.0, 1.0 vvm, Fed batch, 97 h incubation time, 30°C, 400 rpm. | 142.5 | 0.42 | 1.47 a | [ | |
| 44 g/L glucose, supplemented with YP medium, pH 4.3, aeration 10% dissolved oxygen, batch, 18 h incubation, 38°C, 200 rpm. | 14.4 | 0.32 | 0.78 | [ | |
| 90 g/L glucose, supplemented with a medium containing 5 g/L yeast extract, trace elements, pH 6.5, 1.0 vvm, batch, 30 h incubation, 37°C without shaking. | 30 | 0.33 | 1.15 | [ | |
| Corncob hemicellulose hydrolysate (39.5 g/L xylose, 9.9 g/L glucose, 1.5 g/L arabinose, and 1.8 g/L acetate), supplemented with a medium containing 1.5 g/L yeast extract, pH 6, 0.3 vvm, batch, 48 h incubation, 37°C, 300 rpm. | 23.5 | 0.46 | 0.49 | [ | |
| 200 g/L glucose, supplemented with a medium containing EDTA 0.05 M, pH 6.5, 1.0 vvm, fed-batch, 60 h incubation, 37°C, 200 rpm. | 130 | 0.48 | 1.63 a | [ | |
| 220 g/L glucose, supplemented with a medium, pH 6.0, aeration 1.0 vvm, batch, 81 h incubation, 37°C, 200 rpm. | 86.2 | 0.39 | 1.06 | [ | |
| Total glucose utilized 168 g/L, supplemented with medium, pH 7.0, 1.5 vvm, fed-batch, 48 h incubation time, 37°C, 500 rpm. | 150 | 0.43 | 4.21a | [ |
a Productivity calculated under fed-batch.