Literature DB >> 27603593

Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for low-grade cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature.

Maria Kyrgiou1,2, Ilkka Kalliala1, Anita Mitra1, Ka Ying Bonnie Ng3, Olivia Raglan1, Christina Fotopoulou1,2, Pierre Martin-Hirsch4,5, Evangelos Paraskevaidis6, Marc Arbyn7.   

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the optimum management strategy for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS/borderline) or low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL/mild dyskaryosis) cytological abnormalities at primary screening in the absence of HPV DNA test. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL and included randomised controlled trials comparing immediate colposcopy to cytological surveillance in women with ASCUS/LSIL. The outcomes of interest were occurrence of different histological grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and default rates during follow-up. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effect model and with inverse variance weighting. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Six RCTs were included. Immediate colposcopy significantly increased detection of unimportant abnormalities as opposed to repeat cytology (koilocytosis: 32 vs. 21%, RR: 1.49, 95% CI = 1.17-1.90); CIN1: 21 vs. 8%, RR: 2.58, 95% CI = 1.69-3.94). Although immediate colposcopy detected CIN2, CIN2+, and CIN3+ earlier than cytology, the differences were no longer observed at 24 months (CIN3+: 10.3 vs.11.9%, RR: 1.02, 95% CI = 0.53-1.97), with significant interstudy heterogeneity (p < 0.001, I2  = 93%). Default risk was significantly higher for repeat cytology (6 months: 6.3 vs. 13.3%, RR: 3.85, 95% CI = 1.27-11.63; 12 months: 6.3 vs. 14.8%, RR: 6.39, 95% CI = 1.24-32.95; 24 months: 0.9 vs. 16.1%, RR: 19.1, 95% CI = 9.02-40.4). Detection of CIN2+ for cytological surveillance over two years is similar to that of immediate colposcopy, although patients may default. Colposcopy may be first choice when good compliance is not assured, but may increase detection of insignificant lesions. This emphasizes the need for a reflex triage test to distinguish women who need diagnostic work-up from those who can return to routine recall.
© 2016 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASCUS; borderline; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; cervix; colposcopy; cytology; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; mild dyskaryosis; randomized controlled trials; smear

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27603593     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  3 in total

Review 1.  Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Ilkka E J Kalliala; Anita Mitra; Christina Fotopoulou; Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Margaret Cruickshank; Marc Arbyn; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-26

2.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage in Korean women: Revisiting the 2012 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology screening guidelines.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Hyun; Kyung-Jin Min; Sun Young Yang; Jae-Kwan Lee; Jin Hwa Hong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-07-14

Review 3.  Role of colposcopy in the management of women with abnormal cytology.

Authors:  Roopa Hariprasad; Srabani Mittal; Partha Basu
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.345

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.