Literature DB >> 27603498

The economic burden of common adverse events associated with metastatic colorectal cancer treatment in the United States.

Dominick Latremouille-Viau1, Jane Chang2, Annie Guerin1, Sherry Shi1, Ed Wang2, Justin Yu3, Christopher Ngai2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Adverse events (AEs) associated with treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may compromise the course of treatment, impact quality-of-life, and increase healthcare resource utilization. This study assessed the direct healthcare costs of common AEs among mCRC patients in the US.
METHODS: Adult mCRC patients treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapies were identified from administrative claims databases (2009-2014). Up to the first three mCRC treatment episodes per patient were considered and categorized as with or without the AE system/organ category during the episode. Total healthcare costs (2014 USD) were measured by treatment episode and reported on a monthly basis. Treatment episodes with the AE category were matched by treatment type and line of treatment to those without the AE category. Adjusted total cost differences were estimated by comparing costs during treatment episodes with vs without the AE category using multivariate regression models; p-values were estimated with bootstrap.
RESULTS: A total of 4158 patients with ≥1 mCRC treatment episode were included (mean age = 59 years; 58% male; 60% with liver and 14% with lung metastases; 2,261 [54%] with a second and 1,115 [27%] with a third episode). On average, two treatment episodes were observed per patient with an average length of 166 days per episode. Adjusted monthly total cost difference by AE category included hematologic ($1,480), respiratory ($1,253), endocrine/metabolic ($1,213), central nervous system (CNS; $1,136), and cardiovascular ($1,036; all p < .05). LIMITATIONS: Claims do not include information on the cause of AEs, and potentially less severe AEs may not have been reported by the physician when billing the medical service. This study aimed to assess the association between costs and AEs and not the causation of AEs by treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The most costly AEs among mCRC patients were hematologic, followed by respiratory, endocrine/metabolic, CNS, and cardiovascular.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Costs; Economic burden; Health resource utilization; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Treatment outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27603498     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1225577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular complications of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Kalliopi Keramida; Georgios Charalampopoulos; Dimitrios Filippiadis; Elias Tsougos; Dimitrios Farmakis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

Review 2.  The use of pharmacogenetics to increase the safety of colorectal cancer patients treated with fluoropyrimidines.

Authors:  Elena De Mattia; Rossana Roncato; Chiara Dalle Fratte; Fabrizio Ecca; Giuseppe Toffoli; Erika Cecchin
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2019-03-19

3.  Assessment of costs associated with adverse events in patients with cancer.

Authors:  William Wong; Yeun Mi Yim; Ashley Kim; Martin Cloutier; Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle; Patrick Gagnon-Sanschagrin; Annie Guerin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The Road so Far in Colorectal Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Are We Closer to Individualised Treatment?

Authors:  Ana Rita Simões; Ceres Fernández-Rozadilla; Olalla Maroñas; Ángel Carracedo
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-11-19

Review 5.  DPYD and UGT1A1 Pharmacogenetic Testing in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: An Overview of the Evidence and Considerations for Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Lisa A Varughese; Kelsey S Lau-Min; Christine Cambareri; Nevena Damjanov; Ryan Massa; Nandi Reddy; Randall Oyer; Ursina Teitelbaum; Sony Tuteja
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Consumer credit as a novel marker for economic burden and health after cancer in a diverse population of breast cancer survivors in the USA.

Authors:  Lorraine T Dean; Kathryn H Schmitz; Kevin D Frick; Lauren H Nicholas; Yuehan Zhang; S V Subramanian; Kala Visvanathan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.442

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.