Literature DB >> 27602887

The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description.

Christopher R Madan1,2, Elliot A Ludvig3, Marcia L Spetch1.   

Abstract

People's risk preferences differ for choices based on described probabilities versus those based on information learned through experience. For decisions from description, people are typically more risk averse for gains than for losses. In contrast, for decisions from experience, people are sometimes more risk seeking for gains than losses, especially for choices with the possibility of extreme outcomes (big wins or big losses), which are systematically overweighed in memory. Using a within-subject design, this study evaluated whether this memory bias plays a role in the differences in risky choice between description and experience. As in previous studies, people were more risk seeking for losses than for gains in description but showed the opposite pattern in experience. People also more readily remembered the extreme outcomes and judged them as having occurred more frequently. These memory biases correlated with risk preferences in decisions from experience but not in decisions from description. These results suggest that systematic memory biases may be responsible for some of the differences in risk preference across description and experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Decisions from description; Decisions from experience; Description–experience gap; Memory; Risky choice

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27602887     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1220608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  6 in total

1.  Magnitude and incentives: revisiting the overweighting of extreme events in risky decisions from experience.

Authors:  Emmanouil Konstantinidis; Robert T Taylor; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Valence biases in reinforcement learning shift across adolescence and modulate subsequent memory.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Hannah L Grassie; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Crossing boundaries: Global reorientation following transfer from the inside to the outside of an arena.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Luke J Holden; Stuart G Spicer; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  A Description-Experience Framework of the Psychology of Risk.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Dirk U Wulff
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-07

6.  Real-time extended psychophysiological analysis of financial risk processing.

Authors:  Manish Singh; Qingyang Xu; Sarah J Wang; Tinah Hong; Mohammad M Ghassemi; Andrew W Lo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.