Literature DB >> 27602412

The Hidden Lives of Nurses' Cognitive Artifacts.

Jacquelyn W Blaz1, Alexa K Doig, Kristin G Cloyes, Nancy Staggers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardizing nursing handoffs at shift change is recommended to improve communication, with electronic tools as the primary approach. However, nurses continue to rely on personally created paper-based cognitive artifacts - their "paper brains" - to support handoffs, indicating a deficiency in available electronic versions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to develop a deep understanding of nurses' paper-based cognitive artifacts in the context of a cancer specialty hospital.
METHODS: After completing 73 hours of hospital unit field observations, 13 medical oncology nurses were purposively sampled, shadowed for a single shift and interviewed using a semi-structured technique. An interpretive descriptive study design guided analysis of the data corpus of field notes, transcribed interviews, images of nurses' paper-based cognitive artifacts, and analytic memos.
RESULTS: Findings suggest nurses' paper brains are personal, dynamic, living objects that undergo a life cycle during each shift and evolve over the course of a nurse's career. The life cycle has four phases: Creation, Application, Reproduction, and Destruction. Evolution in a nurse's individually styled, paper brain is triggered by a change in the nurse's environment that reshapes cognitive needs. If a paper brain no longer provides cognitive support in the new environment, it is modified into (adapted) or abandoned (made extinct) for a different format that will provide the necessary support.
CONCLUSIONS: The "hidden lives" - the life cycle and evolution - of paper brains have implications for the design of successful electronic tools to support nursing practice, including handoff. Nurses' paper brains provide cognitive support beyond the context of handoff. Information retrieval during handoff is undoubtedly an important function of nurses' paper brains, but tools designed to standardize handoff communication without accounting for cognitive needs during all phases of the paper brain life cycle or the ability to evolve with changes to those cognitive needs will be underutilized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Workarounds and unanticipated consequences; cognition; electronic health records and systems; inpatient care; nursing notes; provider-provider handoff communication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27602412      PMCID: PMC5052553          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-01-RA-0007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  27 in total

1.  Using continuous process improvement methodology to standardize nursing handoff communication.

Authors:  Kristi Klee; Linda Latta; Sallie Davis-Kirsch; Maria Pecchia
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Barriers and facilitators to nursing handoffs: Recommendations for redesign.

Authors:  Catherine Amber Welsh; Mindy E Flanagan; Patricia Ebright
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Concept analysis of cognitive artifacts.

Authors:  Sharon McLane; James P Turley; Adol Esquivel; Joan Engebretson; Kimberly A Smith; Geri L Wood; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.824

4.  Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  Kim Alvarado; Ruth Lee; Emily Christoffersen; Nancy Fram; Sheryl Boblin; Nancy Poole; Janie Lucas; Shirley Forsyth
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2006

5.  Standardization of change-of-shift report.

Authors:  Pam Athwal; Willa Fields; Esther Wagnell
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.597

6.  Knowing in nursing: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Susan A Bonis
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Knowing the patient: a process model for individualized interventions.

Authors:  L E Radwin
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  How to improve your shift report.

Authors:  C Mosher; R Bontomasi
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.220

9.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  One Size Does Not Fit All: EHR Clinical Summary Design Requirements for Nurses.

Authors:  Sharon McLane; James P Turley
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Nurse workarounds in the electronic health record: An integrative review.

Authors:  Dan Fraczkowski; Jeffrey Matson; Karen Dunn Lopez
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Faster clinical response to the onset of adverse events: A wearable metacognitive attention aid for nurse triage of clinical alarms.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarlane; Alexa K Doig; James A Agutter; Lara M Brewer; Noah D Syroid; Ranjeev Mittu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Organizational diagnostics: a systematic approach to identifying technology and workflow issues in clinical settings.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Laurie Lovett Novak; Courtney Van Houten; JoAnn Brooks; Andrew O Smith; Joyce Webb Harris; Taylor Avery; Christopher Simpson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-04-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.