Literature DB >> 27602376

Modifications of traditional pressure gloves for improved performance in scar flexion contracture prevention and fingertip circulation inspection.

Hongliang Zhao1, Yan Chen2, Cuiping Zhang3, Xiaobing Fu3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 27602376      PMCID: PMC5012026          DOI: 10.4103/2321-3868.134083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns Trauma        ISSN: 2321-3868


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear editor, Scar hyperplasia and contracture may occur both during the spontaneous healing process of burn injuries and after surgical correction of burn-injury-related hand dysfunction or deformity such as ulnar claw.[1] Pressure gloves, capable of suppressing local scar hypertrophy and preventing scar contracture formation through scar tissue stretching, are commonly used during the rehabilitation phase in burn patients.[2] Nevertheless, traditional or conventional pressure gloves have significant drawbacks. First, traditional gloves are finger closed that cannot adequately keep fingers straight when patients are sleeping or lying in bed. They are also associated with low patient compliance and difficulties being applied to the areas of anatomical flexures because of high-frequency movement. Splints that are designed to stretch tissue scars, prevent scar contractures, and correct the underlying problems may compensate for the inability of traditional pressure gloves to hold fingers in straight positions.[3] However, it is difficult and complicated to fix splints on gloves. To overcome this technical challenge, we attempted to perform a customised modification of the traditional pressure gloves. More specifically, a pocket is generated by sewing a piece of cloth outside the injured finger, allowing for one piece of thermoplastic splints to be inserted in a sandwich manner or two pieces of thermoplastic, one on the top and the other at the bottom of the finger [Figure 1]. This modification enables the use of pressure gloves and splints in combination, which not only has better patient compliance but also allows for adjustments at will to meet the need of movements of the finger with scars.
Figure 1:

Materials used for an improved pressure glove.

Materials used for an improved pressure glove. Another drawback of the conventional finger-closed gloves is the inconvenience in checking up and evaluating the circulation in the distal end of the finger (i.e., the fingertip).[4] To overcome this inconvenience, we made another modification of the traditional pressure gloves by cutting the distal end of each finger open, thereby allowing for easier inspection of the circulation in the fingertip by doctors [Figure 2].
Figure 2:

The pressure glove with an additional pocket inserted by a shaped thermoplastic splint and an open window at the distal end of each finger.

The pressure glove with an additional pocket inserted by a shaped thermoplastic splint and an open window at the distal end of each finger.
Access this article online
Quick Response Code: Website: www.burnstrauma.com
DOI: 10.4103/2321-3868.134083
  4 in total

Review 1.  A review on static splinting therapy to prevent burn scar contracture: do clinical and experimental data warrant its clinical application?

Authors:  H J Schouten; M K Nieuwenhuis; P P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Comparison of positive pressure gloves on hand function in adults with burns.

Authors:  Kimberly A O'Brien; Gwen Weinstock-Zlotnick; Hope Hunter; Roger W Yurt
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 3.  The stiff finger.

Authors:  F Thomas D Kaplan
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 4.  Prevention and curative management of hypertrophic scar formation.

Authors:  Monica C T Bloemen; Willem M van der Veer; Magda M W Ulrich; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Frank B Niessen; Esther Middelkoop
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.744

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Process of Hypertrophic Scar Formation: Expression of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 6.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Yang; Si-Si Yang; Jiang-Lin Tan; Gao-Xing Luo; Wei-Feng He; Jun Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.