Literature DB >> 27602183

Complete genome sequences of the Serratia plymuthica strains 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18, two rhizosphere bacteria with antagonistic activity towards fungal phytopathogens and plant growth promoting abilities.

Eveline Adam1, Henry Müller1, Armin Erlacher1, Gabriele Berg1.   

Abstract

The Serratia plymuthica strains 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 are motile, Gram-negative, non-sporulating bacteria. Strain 3Rp8 was isolated from the rhizosphere of Brassica napus L. and strain 3Re4-18 from the endorhiza of Solanum tuberosum L. Studies have shown in vitro activity against the soil-borne fungi Verticillium dahliae Kleb., Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Here, we announce and describe the complete genome sequence of S. plymuthica 3Rp8 consisting of a single circular chromosome of 5.5 Mb that encodes 4954 protein-coding and 108 RNA-only encoding genes and of S. plymuthica 3Re4-18 consisting of a single circular chromosome of 5.4 Mb that encodes 4845 protein-coding and 109 RNA-only encoding genes. The whole genome sequences and annotations are available in NCBI under the locus numbers CP012096 and CP012097, respectively. The genome analyses revealed genes putatively responsible for the promising plant growth promoting and biocontrol properties including predicting factors such as secretion systems, iron scavenging siderophores, chitinases, secreted proteases, glucanases and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, as well as unique genomic islands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antagonistic rhizosphere bacteria; Biocontrol; Plant growth promotion; Secretion systems; Serratia plymuthica

Year:  2016        PMID: 27602183      PMCID: PMC5012090          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0185-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

species are well known for their potential as biocontrol agents with broad-spectrum antagonistic activities against common phytopathogens and their plant growth-promoting abilities. 3Rp8 was isolated as an indigenous colonizer of oilseed rape ( L.) rhizosphere and is an in vitro antagonist of the soil-borne fungal phytopathogens Kleb., Kühn and [1] which can cause severe yield losses in a large number of different crops. Chitinase and protease activity were demonstrated by plate assays and the production of N-acylhomoserine lactones was detected using bioluminescent sensor plasmid pSB403 [1, 2]. 3Re4-18 was isolated from the endorhiza of a potato plant ( L.) and was identified as the most effective isolate in an in vitro study screening potato-associated bacterial communities for antagonistic functions against plant pathogenic fungi [3]. Both strains were sequenced to augment current studies targeting novel biotechnological applications for seed and root treatment since the strains represent promising candidates for biological control. In this report, we summarize the complete genome sequences and annotations of 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 and describe their genomic properties. Analysis of the genomes of 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 will provide a framework for further studies of their rhizosphere competence, biocontrol properties, and plant growth promoting activity. 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 are deposited in the strain collection of antagonistic microorganisms at Graz University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Austria.

Organism information

Classification and features

3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 are motile, Gram-negative, non-sporulating . Colonies appear yellow-beige opaque, domed and moderately mucoid with smooth margins on Luria-Bertani (LB) solid media and form colonies within 24 h at 20 °C (Fig. 1a-b). Both strains grow in standard complex media such as LB, potato dextrose agar (PDA), Waksman agar (WA) and nutrient agar (NA) [4] as well as in minimal medium such as Standard Succinate Medium (SSM). The standard growth temperature is at 30 °C, but both strains can replicate in liquid LB at 5 °C and at 40 °C as well. Both strains do not show a production of red pigments on the media mentioned above. The rod-shaped cells are approximately 0.5 μm in width and 2.0 μm in length (Fig. 1c-d).
Fig. 1

S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 on solid media and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy micrographs. a-b S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 grown on LB solid media after 24 h at 30 °C. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy micrographs: c and d show the cell morphology of pure cultures of 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 after SYTO 9 green-fluorescent staining. e-f Fluorescence in situ hybridized 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 colonizing the roots of young lettuce seedlings 1 week after inoculation in a gnotobiotic plant growth approach

S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 on solid media and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy micrographs. a-b S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 grown on LB solid media after 24 h at 30 °C. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy micrographs: c and d show the cell morphology of pure cultures of 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 after SYTO 9 green-fluorescent staining. e-f Fluorescence in situ hybridized 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 colonizing the roots of young lettuce seedlings 1 week after inoculation in a gnotobiotic plant growth approach 3Rp8 was isolated from the roots of oilseed rape cultivar Express grown for a field trial in Braunschweig (Germany) in 1998 [1, 5]. 3Re4-18 was isolated from the endorhiza of an early senescent L. cultivar Cilena at the experimental station of the Institute for Plant Diseases, Bonn University in Bonn-Poppelsdorf (Germany) in 2001 [3]. Both bacterial strains are efficient colonizer of oilseed rape and cauliflower [4], lettuce and pumpkin roots (unpublished data) and do not cause any obvious negative effects to those hosts. Priming of oilseed rape and cauliflower seeds with the 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 strains had a significant PGP effect on the root weights of the oilseed rape seedlings [4]. Figure 1e-f shows 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 colonizing the roots of young lettuce seedlings 1 week after inoculation in a gnotobiotic plant growth approach. The strains have natural resistance to Cefuroxime, Cefuroxime Axetil and Cefoxitin (minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) > = 64 mg/L) as well as Fosfomycin (MIC > = 256 mg/L). Minimum Information about the Genome Sequences (MIGS) of 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 are summarized in Table 1, and their phylogenetic position is shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) data were calculated with Gegenees [6] version 2.2.1 by using a fragmented all against all comparison. The data are illustrated as heat-plot in Fig. 4.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Serratia plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 according to the MIGS recommendations [20]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [21]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [22]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [23, 24]
Order “Enterobacteriales” TAS [25]
Family Enterobacteriaceae TAS [2628]
Genus Serratia TAS [26, 29, 30]
Species Serratia plymuthica TAS [26, 31]
Strain Serratia plymuthica 3Rp8TAS [1]
Strain Serratia plymuthica 3Re4-18TAS [3]
Gram stainGram-negativeTAS [30]
Cell shapeRod-shapedIDA
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationNon-spore formingIDA
Temperature range5-40 °CIDA
Optimum temperature30 °CIDA
pH range; Optimum5–9; 6IDA
Carbon sourceHeterotrophicIDA, TAS [1, 3, 4]
MIGS-6HabitatRoot-associatedTAS [1, 3]
MIGS-6.3Salinity3Rp8 - 0.5 %-8 % NaCl (w/v)3Re4-18 - 0.5 %-9 % NaCl (w/v)IDA
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementFacultative anaerobeTAS [30, 32]
MIGS-15Biotic relationship3Rp8 - Rhizospheric3Re4-18 - Root endophyticIDA, TAS [1]IDA, TAS [3]
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenicNAS, TAS [30, 33]
MIGS-4Geographic location3Rp8 - North Germany3Re4-18 - West GermanyTAS [1]TAS [3]
MIGS-5Sample collection3Rp8 - 19983Re4-18 - 2001TAS [1]TAS [3]
MIGS-4.1Latitude3Rp8 - ~52.27 N3Re4-18 - ~50.72 NNAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude3Rp8 - ~10.57 E3Re4-18 - ~7.09 ENAS
MIGS-4.4Altitude3Rp8 - ~72 m.a.s.l.3Re4-18 - ~63 m.a.s.l.NAS

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34]

Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree indicating the phylogenetic relationship of sequenced isolates. The phylogenetic relationships inferred from the alignment of 1532 bp of 16S rDNA highlighting the positions of S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 relative to their closest Serratia strains for which 16S rDNA sequences are publicly available. A representative rhizosphere bacterium from the genera Pseudomonas was used as outgroup. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [35]. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [36]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [37]

Fig. 3

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from three housekeeping genes. The phylogenetic relationships inferred from the alignment of 8077 bp of concatenated DNA from three housekeeping genes highlighting the positions of S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 relative to their closest Serratia strains for which complete genomes are publicly available. A representative rhizosphere bacterium from the genera Pseudomonas was used as outgroup. For the construction of the tree, the protein-coding house-keeping genes gyrB (2420 bp), rpoP (4146 bp) and nusA (1511 bp) were concatenated and aligned. Then the evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [35]. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [36]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [37]

Fig. 4

Phylogenomic overview using ANI data calculated from whole genome sequences. The heat-plot was compiled in Gegenees [6] and is based on a fragmented alignment using BLASTN made with settings 200/100 (accurate calculation). The cutoff threshold for non-conserved material was set to 30 %

Classification and general features of Serratia plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 according to the MIGS recommendations [20] aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34] Maximum likelihood 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree indicating the phylogenetic relationship of sequenced isolates. The phylogenetic relationships inferred from the alignment of 1532 bp of 16S rDNA highlighting the positions of S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 relative to their closest Serratia strains for which 16S rDNA sequences are publicly available. A representative rhizosphere bacterium from the genera Pseudomonas was used as outgroup. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [35]. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [36]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [37] Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from three housekeeping genes. The phylogenetic relationships inferred from the alignment of 8077 bp of concatenated DNA from three housekeeping genes highlighting the positions of S. plymuthica 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 relative to their closest Serratia strains for which complete genomes are publicly available. A representative rhizosphere bacterium from the genera Pseudomonas was used as outgroup. For the construction of the tree, the protein-coding house-keeping genes gyrB (2420 bp), rpoP (4146 bp) and nusA (1511 bp) were concatenated and aligned. Then the evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [35]. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [36]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [37] Phylogenomic overview using ANI data calculated from whole genome sequences. The heat-plot was compiled in Gegenees [6] and is based on a fragmented alignment using BLASTN made with settings 200/100 (accurate calculation). The cutoff threshold for non-conserved material was set to 30 %

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The strains 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 were selected for sequencing due to their in vitro activity against and , their production of hydrolytic enzymes and their root-associated lifestyle on plants [1, 3, 4]. The sequence data will help to reveal genetic features responsible for their plant growth promoting effects and their ability to protect seeds against fungal threats during germination. The genome project is deposited in the NCBI BioProject database under ID 289082 with the Biosample UIDs 3841799 and 3841798, respectively. The finished genome sequences are deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP012096 and CP012097, respectively. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS 28Libraries usedPacBio RS libraries with inserts of 8 to 20 kb
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsPacBio RS II
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage3Rp8 - 81 x3Re4-18 - 110 x
MIGS 30AssemblersCelera Assembler + Hierarchical genome assembly process v. 2.2.0
MIGS 32Gene calling methodNCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline, Glimmer gene prediction
Locus Tag3Rp8 - ADP723Re4-18 - ADP73
Genbank ID3Rp8 - CP0120963Re4-18 - CP012097
GenBank Date of ReleaseJune 15, 2016
GOLD ID3Rp8 - Gp01370653Re4-18 - Gp0131532
BIOPROJECTPRJNA289082
MIGS 13Source Material Identifier3Rp8 - SAMN038417993Re4-18 - SAMN03841798
Project relevanceAgricultural, Environmental
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

3Rp8 and 3Re4-18 were grown in 50 ml of nutrient broth II (NB II) (Sifin, Berlin, Germany) medium and incubated for 20 h at 30 °C. 0.5 ml was then centrifuged at 2500 x g for 5 min at 4 °C and genomic DNA was extracted using the MasterPure DNA purification kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA). DNA quality and quantity were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000c, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Total genomic DNA of 3Rp8 (50.7 μg; 0.8 μg μL-1) and of 3Re4-18 (102.8 μg; 1.7 μg μL-1) was sent on dry ice to the sequencing service.

Genome sequencing and assembly

PacBio RS libraries with inserts of 8 to 20 kb were constructed and sequenced at GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany) using single molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing. Assemblies were completed with the Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process v. 2.2.0 (HGAP) algorithm implemented in the PacBio SMRT Analysis software (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The assembly of the 3Rp8 genome was based on 119,662 quality reads with a mean length of 4581 bp resulting in a single circular chromosome consisting of 5,546,041 bp with 81-fold overall coverage. For assembling the genome of 3Re4-18, 127,834 quality reads with a mean length of 5358 bp were used resulting in a single circular chromosome of 5,439,574 bp with 110-fold overall coverage.

Genome annotation

Automatic annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (released 2013). Additional annotation for using the automated assignment of clusters of orthologous groups (COG)-functions to protein-coding genes was completed on the BASys Web server using Glimmer gene prediction [7-9]. Prediction of Pfam domains, signal peptides and transmembrane helices were calculated using BASys Web Server [7-9], SignalP [10, 11] and TMHMM [12, 13], respectively.

Genome properties

The genome of strain 3Rp8 is composed of one circular chromosome consisting of 5,546,041 bp with an average GC content of 56.07 % (Table 3 and Fig. 5a). Among the 5130 predicted genes, 4954 (96.57 %) were identified as protein coding genes, 68 (1.33 %) were designated as pseudo genes, 22 (0.43 %) as rRNAs, 85 (1.66 %) as tRNAs and one (0.02 %) as ncRNA. 21 (0.41 %) genes were frameshifted.
Table 3

Genome statistics

3Rp83Re4-18
AttributeValue% of Totala Value% of Totala
Genome size (bp)5,546,041100.005,439,574100.00
DNA coding (bp)4,745,09885.564,683,98286.11
DNA G + C (bp)3,109,69656.073,058,99256.24
DNA scaffolds1-1-
Total genes5130100.005005100.00
Protein coding genes495496.57484596.80
RNA genes1082.111092.18
Pseudo genes681.33511.02
Genes in internal clustersNA-NA-
Genes with function prediction427883.39423984.70
Genes assigned to COGs407779.47401780.26
Genes with Pfam domains382974.64378075.52
Genes with signal peptides4999.734899.77
Genes with transmembrane helices123924.15121324.24
CRISPR repeats0000

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of genes in the annotated genome

Fig. 5

Graphical map of the chromosome of 3Rp8 (a) and 3Re4-18 (b). The outer scale is marked every 10 kb. Circles range from 1 (outer circle) to 7 (inner circle). Circle 1 and 2, ORFs encoded by leading and lagging strand respectively, with color code for functions: salmon, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; aquamarine, RNA processing and modification; light blue, transcription; cyan, DNA replication, recombination and repair; tan, chromatin structure and dynamics; turquoise, cell division; dark orange, defense mechanisms; deep pink, post-translational modification, protein turnover and chaperones; dark olive green, cell envelope biogenesis; purple, cell motility and secretion; lavender, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; forest green, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; pink, signal transduction; red, energy production; sienna, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; yellow, amino acid transport; orange, nucleotide transport and metabolism; gold, co-enzyme transport and metabolism; cornflower blue, lipid metabolism; blue, secondary metabolites, transport and catabolism; gray, general function prediction only; yellow green, unknown function; black, function unclassified or unknown. Circle 3 and 4, distributions of tRNA genes and rrn operons respectively. Circle 5, distribution of pseudogenes. Circle 6 and 7, G + C content and GC skew (G-C/G + C) respectively

Genome statistics aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of genes in the annotated genome Graphical map of the chromosome of 3Rp8 (a) and 3Re4-18 (b). The outer scale is marked every 10 kb. Circles range from 1 (outer circle) to 7 (inner circle). Circle 1 and 2, ORFs encoded by leading and lagging strand respectively, with color code for functions: salmon, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; aquamarine, RNA processing and modification; light blue, transcription; cyan, DNA replication, recombination and repair; tan, chromatin structure and dynamics; turquoise, cell division; dark orange, defense mechanisms; deep pink, post-translational modification, protein turnover and chaperones; dark olive green, cell envelope biogenesis; purple, cell motility and secretion; lavender, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; forest green, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; pink, signal transduction; red, energy production; sienna, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; yellow, amino acid transport; orange, nucleotide transport and metabolism; gold, co-enzyme transport and metabolism; cornflower blue, lipid metabolism; blue, secondary metabolites, transport and catabolism; gray, general function prediction only; yellow green, unknown function; black, function unclassified or unknown. Circle 3 and 4, distributions of tRNA genes and rrn operons respectively. Circle 5, distribution of pseudogenes. Circle 6 and 7, G + C content and GC skew (G-C/G + C) respectively The genome of strain 3Re4-18 is composed of one circular chromosome of 5,439,574 bp with an average GC content of 56.24 % (Table 3 and Fig. 5b). Among the 5005 predicted genes, 4845 (96.80 %) were identified as protein coding genes, 51 (1.02 %) were designated as pseudo genes, 22 (0.44 %) as rRNAs, 86 (1.72 %) as tRNAs and one (0.02 %) as ncRNA. 19 (0.38 %) genes were frameshifted. The GC contents of both strains are similar to that of other strains. The classification of CDSs into functional categories according to the COG database [14, 15] is summarized in Table 4 on BASys gene prediction.
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Code3Rp83Re4-18Description
Value%ageValue%age
J1692.901672.97Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.0210.02RNA processing and modification
K4417.574457.92Transcription
L1702.921522.70Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0210.02Chromatin structure and dynamics
D270.46280.50Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
V581.00561.00Defense mechanisms
T1412.421462.60Signal transduction mechanisms
M2564.402564.55Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N991.70901.60Cell motility
U540.93490.87Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1532.631482.63Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2614.482594.61Energy production and conversion
G4127.084067.22Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E4427.594337.70Amino acid transport and metabolism
F891.53901.60Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1442.471452.58Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1502.581382.45Lipid transport and metabolism
P2464.222464.38Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q961.65911.62Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R3836.583856.85General function prediction only
S2844.882855.07Function unknown
-174629.98160528.55Not in COGs

The percentage is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome based on BASys gene prediction [7–9]

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The percentage is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome based on BASys gene prediction [7-9]

Insights from the genome sequence

Both strains share a collection of genes that may be important contributors to biological control with other strains already published, like genes annotated as secretion systems, iron scavenging siderophores (locus tags ADP72_19185, ADP73_16995), chitinases (e.g. locus tags ADP72_04805, ADP73_00825), secreted proteases (e.g. locus tags ADP72_11930, ADP73_24375), glucanases (e.g. locus tags ADP72_10355, ADP73_00890) and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (e.g. locus tags ADP72_05100, ADP73_05800). Additionally, genes predicting plant growth promotion, like spermidine synthases (e.g. locus tags ADP72_15170, ADP73_11985), indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylases (locus tags ADP72_18190, ADP73_17980) or diacetyl-reductase (locus tags ADP72_19475, ADP73_16745) were detected. Unique genomic islands were identified in both strains with IslandViewer 3 software [16-18]. In 3Rp8 coding regions containing high similarities on DNA-level with a region in TT01 [19] as well as a region annotated as type IV/VI secretion system were found. In 3Re4-18 unique coding regions for proteins related to type VI secretion systems as well as other islands with putatively phage origin were detected.

Conclusions

Here, we announce the complete genome sequences of 3Rp8 and 3Re4-18, two enterobacteria that were originally isolated in Germany from oilseed rape rhizosphere and from endorhiza of potato, respectively. Both strains were selected for sequencing based on their ability to control soil-borne plant-pathogenic fungi. Such properties likely have origins in a repertoire of genes probably involved in fungal cell wall degradation expressed by chitinases, proteases or non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. They also share a collection of genes known to be responsible for specific PGP features and both carry unique genomic islands with interesting genes for agricultural applications. Further functional studies and comparative genomics with related isolates will greatly enhance the understanding of biocontrol and PGP features.
  22 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools.

Authors:  Olof Emanuelsson; Søren Brunak; Gunnar von Heijne; Henrik Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed.

Authors:  K Smalla; G Wieland; A Buchner; A Zock; J Parzy; S Kaiser; N Roskot; H Heuer; G Berg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models.

Authors:  S L Salzberg; A L Delcher; S Kasif; O White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  K Tamura; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  IslandViewer update: Improved genomic island discovery and visualization.

Authors:  Bhavjinder K Dhillon; Terry A Chiu; Matthew R Laird; Morgan G I Langille; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  IslandViewer: an integrated interface for computational identification and visualization of genomic islands.

Authors:  Morgan G I Langille; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  BASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation.

Authors:  Gary H Van Domselaar; Paul Stothard; Savita Shrivastava; Joseph A Cruz; AnChi Guo; Xiaoli Dong; Paul Lu; Duane Szafron; Russ Greiner; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  IslandViewer 3: more flexible, interactive genomic island discovery, visualization and analysis.

Authors:  Bhavjinder K Dhillon; Matthew R Laird; Julie A Shay; Geoffrey L Winsor; Raymond Lo; Fazmin Nizam; Sheldon K Pereira; Nicholas Waglechner; Andrew G McArthur; Morgan G I Langille; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Endophytic Bacterium Serratia plymuthica From Chinese Leek Suppressed Apple Ring Rot on Postharvest Apple Fruit.

Authors:  Meng Sun; Junping Liu; Jinghui Li; Yonghong Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.