Literature DB >> 27601592

High-Risk Premenopausal Luminal A Breast Cancer Patients Derive no Benefit from Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide-based Chemotherapy: Results from the DBCG77B Clinical Trial.

Torsten O Nielsen1, Maj-Brit Jensen2, Samantha Burugu3, Dongxia Gao3, Charlotte L Tykjaer Jørgensen2, Eva Balslev2, Bent Ejlertsen2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Luminal A breast cancers have better prognosis than other molecular subtypes. Luminal A cancers may also be insensitive to adjuvant chemotherapy, although there is little high-level evidence to confirm this concept. The primary hypothesis in this formal prospective-retrospective analysis was to assess interaction between subtype (Luminal A vs. other) and treatment (chemotherapy vs. not) for the primary endpoint (10-year invasive disease-free survival) of a breast cancer trial randomizing women to adjuvant chemotherapy, analyzed in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models using the Wald interaction test.Experimental Design: The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 77B clinical trial randomized 1,072 premenopausal women to no systematic treatment (control), levamisole, cyclophosphamide, or cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil arms. All arms included radiotherapy but no endocrine therapy. Researchers with no access to clinical data performed intrinsic subtype analysis on tissue microarrays using published immunohistochemical methods based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, and basal markers.
Results: Patients (n = 709) had tissue available; chemotherapy benefit in these patients was similar to the original trial (HR, 0.56). Immunohistochemistry classified 165 as Luminal A, 319 Luminal B, 58 HER2-enriched, and 82 core basal (among 91 triple-negative). Patients with Luminal A breast tumors did not benefit from chemotherapy [HR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53-2.14; P = 0.86], whereas patients with non-luminal A subtypes did (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.66; P < 0.001; Pinteraction = 0.048).Conclusions: In a prospective-retrospective analysis of a randomized trial, patients with Luminal A breast cancers did not benefit from adjuvant cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(4); 946-53. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601592     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  17 in total

1.  AMPK Activation by Metformin Promotes Survival of Dormant ER+ Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Riley A Hampsch; Jason D Wells; Nicole A Traphagen; Charlotte F McCleery; Jennifer L Fields; Kevin Shee; Lloye M Dillon; Darcy B Pooler; Lionel D Lewis; Eugene Demidenko; Yina H Huang; Jonathan D Marotti; Abigail E Goen; William B Kinlaw; Todd W Miller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  PAM50 Provides Prognostic Information When Applied to the Lymph Node Metastases of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nicholas P Tobin; Arian Lundberg; Linda S Lindström; J Chuck Harrell; Theodoros Foukakis; Lena Carlsson; Zakaria Einbeigi; Barbro K Linderholm; Niklas Loman; Martin Malmberg; Mårten Fernö; Kamila Czene; Charles M Perou; Jonas Bergh; Thomas Hatschek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Luminal A Breast Cancer and Molecular Assays: A Review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Gao; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-02-22

4.  Prediction of treatment responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Yunxia Huang; Jian Le; Aiyu Miao; Wenxiang Zhi; Fen Wang; Yaling Chen; Shichong Zhou; Cai Chang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-04

5.  Do Patients with Luminal A Breast Cancer Profit from Adjuvant Systemic Therapy? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Joachim Diessner; Manfred Wischnewsky; Maria Blettner; Sebastian Häusler; Wolfgang Janni; Rolf Kreienberg; Roland Stein; Tanja Stüber; Lukas Schwentner; Catharina Bartmann; Achim Wöckel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prospective, multicenter French study evaluating the clinical impact of the Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype-Prosigna® Test in the management of early-stage breast cancers.

Authors:  Delphine Hequet; Céline Callens; David Gentien; Benoit Albaud; Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier; Coraline Dubot; Paul Cottu; Cyrille Huchon; Sonia Zilberman; Helene Berseneff; Cyril Foa; Rémy Salmon; Aurélie Roulot; Florence Lerebours; Anne Salomon; Nadeem Ghali; Pascale Morel; Qianyi Li; Anne Cayre; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; John Hornberger; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Roman Rouzier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  DNA methylation signature (SAM40) identifies subgroups of the Luminal A breast cancer samples with distinct survival.

Authors:  Thomas Fleischer; Jovana Klajic; Miriam Ragle Aure; Riku Louhimo; Arne V Pladsen; Lars Ottestad; Nizar Touleimat; Marko Laakso; Ann Rita Halvorsen; Grethe I Grenaker Alnæs; Margit L H Riis; Åslaug Helland; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Per Eystein Lønning; Bjørn Naume; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Jörg Tost; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03

8.  The Prosigna gene expression assay and responsiveness to adjuvant cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in premenopausal high-risk patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Maj-Britt Jensen; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Torsten O Nielsen; Jens Ole Eriksen; Pernille Wehn; Tressa Hood; Namratha Ram; Wesley Buckingham; Sean Ferree; Bent Ejlertsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Clinicopathological characteristics, adjuvant chemotherapy decision and disease outcome in patients with breast cancer with a 21-gene recurrence score of 26-30.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Jiayi Wu; Ou Huang; Jianrong He; Li Zhu; Weiguo Chen; Yafen Li; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Avoiding over- and undertreatment in patients with resected node-positive breast cancer with the use of gene expression signatures: are we there yet?

Authors:  A Matikas; T Foukakis; S Swain; J Bergh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.