Literature DB >> 27601588

Intratumor Heterogeneity of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Primary Breast Cancer.

Marie-Kristin von Wahlde1,2, Kirsten M Timms3, Anees Chagpar4, Vikram B Wali4, Tingting Jiang4, Veerle Bossuyt4, Ozlen Saglam4, Julia Reid3, Alexander Gutin3, Chris Neff3, Jerry S Lanchbury3, Christos Hatzis4, Erin Hofstatter4, Lajos Pusztai1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The 3-biomarker homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay measures the number of telomeric allelic imbalances, loss of heterozygosity, and large-scale state transitions in tumor DNA and combines these metrics into a single score that reflects DNA repair deficiency. The goal of this study is to assess the consistency of these HRD measures in different biopsies from distinct areas of the same cancer.Experimental Design: HRD scores, BRCA mutation status, and BRCA1 promoter methylation were assessed in 99 samples from 33 surgically resected, stage I-III breast cancers; each cancer was biopsied in three distinct areas. Homologous recombination repair (HR) deficiency was defined as either high HRD score (≥42) or tumor BRCA mutation.
Results: Eighty-one biopsies from 32 cancers were analyzed. Tumor BRCA status was available for all samples, HRD scores for 70, and BRCA1 methylation values for 76 samples. The BRCA1/2 mutation and promoter methylation status and HR category showed perfect concordance across all biopsies from the same cancer. All tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations or promoter methylation had high HRD scores, as did 17% (4/24) of the BRCA1/2 wild-type and nonmethylated tumors. The HRD scores were also highly consistent between different biopsies from the same tumor with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.977, indicating that only 2.3% of the variance is attributed to within-tumor biopsy-to-biopsy variation.Conclusions: These results indicate that within-tumor spatial heterogeneity for HRD metrics and the technical noise in the assay are small and do not influence HRD scores and HR status. Clin Cancer Res; 23(5); 1193-9. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601588     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  12 in total

1.  A phase II study of talazoparib monotherapy in patients with wild-type BRCA1 and BRCA2 with a mutation in other homologous recombination genes.

Authors:  Joshua J Gruber; Anosheh Afghahi; Kirsten Timms; Alyssa DeWees; Wyatt Gross; Vasily N Aushev; Hsin-Ta Wu; Mustafa Balcioglu; Himanshu Sethi; Danika Scott; Jessica Foran; Alex McMillan; James M Ford; Melinda L Telli
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2022-10-17

2.  Impact of Etoposide on BRCA1 Expression in Various Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Simone Hofmann; Nadia Harbeck; Udo Jeschke; Sophie Sixou
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2017-12

3.  Reliability of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Assessing Intratumor Genetic Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Weiwei Shi; Charlotte K Y Ng; Raymond S Lim; Tingting Jiang; Sushant Kumar; Xiaotong Li; Vikram B Wali; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Mark B Gerstein; Anees B Chagpar; Britta Weigelt; Lajos Pusztai; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Christos Hatzis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Characterisation of homologous recombination deficiency in paired primary and recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jai N Patel; Ioana Braicu; Kirsten M Timms; Cara Solimeno; Placede Tshiaba; Julia Reid; Jerry S Lanchbury; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Mahrukh K Ganapathi; Jalid Sehouli; Ram N Ganapathi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Tumor mutational profile of triple negative breast cancer patients in Thailand revealed distinctive genetic alteration in chromatin remodeling gene.

Authors:  Suvimol Niyomnaitham; Napa Parinyanitikul; Ekkapong Roothumnong; Worapoj Jinda; Norasate Samarnthai; Taywin Atikankul; Bhoom Suktitipat; Wanna Thongnoppakhun; Chanin Limwongse; Manop Pithukpakorn
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  HRness in Breast and Ovarian Cancers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Santana Dos Santos; François Lallemand; Ambre Petitalot; Sandrine M Caputo; Etienne Rouleau
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Using whole-genome sequencing data to derive the homologous recombination deficiency scores.

Authors:  Katia Nones; Peter T Simpson; Xavier M de Luca; Felicity Newell; Stephen H Kazakoff; Gunter Hartel; Amy E McCart Reed; Oliver Holmes; Qinying Xu; Scott Wood; Conrad Leonard; John V Pearson; Sunil R Lakhani; Nicola Waddell
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-08-07

8.  Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in patients with neoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul Gass; Michael P Lux; Claudia Rauh; Alexander Hein; Mayada R Bani; Cornelia Fiessler; Arndt Hartmann; Lothar Häberle; Jutta Pretscher; Ramona Erber; David L Wachter; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Marius Wunderle
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Distinct Somatic Alteration Features Identified by Gene Panel Sequencing in Korean Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with High Ki67 Expression.

Authors:  Woo Young Sun; Jina Lee; Bong Kyun Kim; Jong Ok Kim; Joonhong Park
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01

10.  Differential whole-genome doubling and homologous recombination deficiencies across breast cancer subtypes from the Taiwanese population.

Authors:  Chia-Hsin Wu; Chia-Shan Hsieh; Yo-Cheng Chang; Chi-Cheng Huang; Hsien-Tang Yeh; Ming-Feng Hou; Yuan-Chiang Chung; Shih-Hsin Tu; King-Jen Chang; Amrita Chattopadhyay; Liang-Chuan Lai; Tzu-Pin Lu; Yung-Hua Li; Mong-Hsun Tsai; Eric Y Chuang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.